Less than 10 years ago the scientific community believed that quality of life (QOL) was part of the art of medicine rather than the science of medicine. In the past few years index methods have been developed and have proven to be sensitive and specific to assess patients' health status not only on a physical, but also on a psychological and social base. We increasingly witness that QOL is implemented in the scientific evaluation of medicine. However, major problems with QOL assessments so far, include the contributing factor patients- opinion, which is very subjective and, therefore, scientifically difficult to handle, and, second, the low sensitivity of QOL-questionnaires to reflect true changes in QOL. The Dutch Mononitrate Quality Of Life (DUMQOL) Study Group has recently addressed both problems. In their hands, the patients' opinion was a consistent and statistically independent determinant of QOL in patients with angina pectoris. The problem of low sensitivity of QOL-assessments could be improved by replacing the absolute score-scales with relative ones, using for that purpose odds ratios of scores. The current chapter reviews the main results of this so far only partly published research 1,2 from the Netherlands.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Frieswijk N, Buunk BP, Janssen RM, Niemeyer MG, Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH. Social comparison and quality of life: evaluation in patients with angina pectoris. Cardiogram 2000; 16: 26–31.
Zwinderman AH, Niemeyer MG, Kleinjans HA, Cleophas TJ. Application of item response modeling for quality of life assessments in patients with stable angina pectoris. In: Clinical Pharmacology, EDS Kuhlman J, Mrozikiewicz A, Zuckschwerd Verlag, New York, 1999, pp 48–56.
Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE. The MOS short form general health survey. Med Care 1988; 26: 724–35.
Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, Westlake L, Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. Br Med J 1992; 305: 160–4.
Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. J Am Med Assoc 1994; 272: 619–26.
Marquis P, Fagol C, Joire JE. Quality of life assessment in patients with angina pectoris. Eur Heart J 1995; 16: 1554–59.
Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 835–40.
Thompson DR, Meadows KA, Lewin RJ. Measuring quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 693–5.
Niemeyer MG, Kleinjans HA, De Ree R, Zwinderman AH, Cleophas TJ, Van der Wall EE. Comparison of multiple dose and once-daily nitrate therapy in 1350 patients with stable angina pectoris. Angiology 1997; 48: 855–63.
Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.
Albert SM, Frank L, Mrri R, Hylandt, Apolone G, Leplége A. Defining and measuring quality of life in medicine. J Am Med Assoc 1998; 279: 429–31.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2009). Quality-of-Life Assessments in Clinical Trials. In: Cleophas, T.J., Zwinderman, A.H., Cleophas, T.F., Cleophas, E.P. (eds) Statistics Applied to Clinical Trials. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9523-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9523-8_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9522-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9523-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)