In pharmaceutical research and development, multiple factors like age, gender, comorbidity, concomitant medication, genetic and environmental factors co-determine the efficacy of the new treatment. In statistical terms we say they interact with the treatment efficacy. It is impossible to estimate all of these factors. Instead, randomized controlled trials are used to ensure that no major imbalances exist regarding these factors, and an overall assessment is made. The limitation of this approach becomes obvious once the new medicine is applied in practice where benefits of new medicines are far less consistent than they are in the trials.1 Despite this limitation, interaction effects, are not routinely assessed in clinical trials, probably because the statistical methods for identifying and integrating them into the data have low power. Moreover, if we introduce a large number of interaction terms in a regression analysis, the power to demonstrate a statistical significance for the primary endpoint will be reduced. Nonetheless, the assessment of a small number of interaction terms in clinical research can be an important part of the evaluation of new drugs, particularly, if it can be argued that the interaction terms make clinically sense. The current chapter gives some important factors that may interact with the treatment efficacy, and proposes some guidelines for implementing an interaction assessment in the analysis of clinical trials, in order to better predict the efficacy / safety of new medicines in future clinical treatment of individual patients.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Riegelman RK. Studying a study and testing a test. Lippincott Williams&Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2005.
De Craen AJM, Westendorp RGJ. The use of age as a variable in clinical research. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005; 149: 2958–63.
Hays WL. Random effects and mixed models. Chapter 13. In: Statistics, 4th edition, Holt, Rhinehart and Winnston Inc, Chicago, 1998, pp 479–543.
Jukema AJ, Zwinderman AH, et al for the REGRESS Study Group. Effects of lipid lowering by pravastatin on progression and regression of coronary artery disease in symptomatic men with normal to moderately elevated serum cholesterol levels. The Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS). Circulation 1995; 91: 2528–40.
Svetkey LP, Simons- Morton D, Vollmer WM, et al. Effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure: subgroup analysis of the Dietary Approaches to Stop -Hypertension (DASH) randomized clinical trial. Arch Int Med 1999; 159: 258 –93.
Shlipak MG, Simon JA, Vittinghoff E, et al. Estrogen and progestin, lipoprotein (a), and the risk of recurrent coronary heart disease events after menopause. JAMA 2000; 283: 1845–52.
Barrett-Connor E. Looking for the pony in the Heart and Estrogen / progestin Replacement Study (HERS) data. Circulation 2002; 105: 902–3.
Chalmers I, Altman DG. Systematic reviews. Edited by Br Med J Books, Bristol Uk, 1996.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2009). Interaction. In: Cleophas, T.J., Zwinderman, A.H., Cleophas, T.F., Cleophas, E.P. (eds) Statistics Applied to Clinical Trials. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9523-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9523-8_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9522-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9523-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)