Skip to main content

Duties, Determinate and Indeterminate

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Global Justice
  • 77 Accesses

Determinateness (or indeterminateness) is tied to the constitutive elements of duties, namely, their content and scope. In addition to exploring determinateness as a matter of content and scope, it is important to understand how determinateness differs from conclusivity, as well as the importance of the role the determinateness of duties plays in our understanding of the nature and content of global justice.

Content and Scope

The content of a duty is the substance of the obligation the duty bearer owes to the duty’s beneficiary. For example, in a promissory duty, the content of the duty is the fulfillment of the promise. The scope of a duty is comprised of the agents whose normative relationship is defined by the duty – the duty bearer and the agent to whom the duty is owed. Under a promise, the scope of the promissory duty includes the promissor and the promisee. A determinate duty is one in which the content and scope of the duty is known with enough specificity that one is able to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 679.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Buchanan A (1996) Perfecting imperfect duties: collective action to create moral obligations. Bus Ethics Q 6(1):27–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan A (1987) Justice and charity. Ethics 97:558–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin J (1982) The limits of moral obligation. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamm F (2004) The new problem of distance in morality. In: Chatterjee DK (ed) The ethics of assistance: morality and the distant needy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 59–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (2005) The problem of global justice. Philos Public Aff 33(2):113–147

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill O (1989) The great maxims of justice and charity. Constructions of reasons: explorations of Kant’s political philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 219–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge T (2002) World poverty and human rights. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Kassner, J.J. (2011). Duties, Determinate and Indeterminate. In: Chatterjee, D.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Justice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_258

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_258

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9159-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9160-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics