A prerequisite to understand cell functioning on the system level is the knowledge of three-dimensional protein structures that mediate biochemical inter actions. The explosion in the number of available gene sequences set the stage for the next step in genome scale projects, to obtain three dimensional structures for each protein. To achieve this ambitious goal, the costly and slow structure determi nation experiments are boosted with theoretical approaches. The current state and recent advances in structure modelling approaches are reviewed here, with special emphasis on comparative structure modelling techniques
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abagyan R, Totrov M (1994) Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and elec trostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. J Mol Biol 235:983–1002
Alber F, Dokudovskaya S, Veenhoff LM, et al. (2007a) Determining the architectures of macro molecular assemblies. Nature 450:683–694
Alber F, Dokudovskaya S, Veenhoff LM, et al. (2007b) The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 450:695–701
Alber F, Forster F, Korkin D, et al. (2008) Integrating diverse data for structure determination of macromolecular assemblies. Annu Rev Biochem 77:443–477
Al Lazikani B, Sheinerman FB, Honig B (2001) Combining multiple structure and sequence alignments to improve sequence detection and alignment: application to the SH2 domains of Janus kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:14796
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402
Andreeva A, Howorth D, Chandonia JM, et al. (2008) Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D419–425
Apostolico A, Giancarlo R (1998) Sequence alignment in molecular biology. J Comput Biol 5:173–196
Apweiler R, Bairoch A, Wu CH (2004) Protein sequence databases. Curr Opin Chem Biol 8:76–80
Aszodi A, Taylor WR (1994) Secondary structure formation in model polypeptide chains. Protein Eng 7:633–644
Aszodi A, Taylor WR (1996) Homology modelling by distance geometry. Fold Des 1:325–334
Baker D, Sali A (2001) Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294:93–96
Barrientos LG, Campos-Olivas R, Louis JM, et al. (2001) 1H, 13C, 15N resonance assignments and fold verification of a circular permuted variant of the potent HIV-inactivating protein cyanovirin-N. J Biomol NMR 19:289–290
Battey JN, Kopp J, Bordoli L, et al. (2007) Automated server predictions in CASP7. Proteins 69(Suppl 8):68–82
Becker OM, Dhanoa DS, Marantz Y, et al. (2006) An integrated in silico 3D model-driven discov ery of a novel, potent, and selective amidosulfonamide 5-HT1A agonist (PRX-00023) for the treatment of anxiety and depression. J Med Chem 49:3116–3135
Berman H, Henrick K, Nakamura H, et al. (2007) The worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB): ensuring a single, uniform archive of PDB data. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D301–303
Blake JD, Cohen FE (2001) Pairwise sequence alignment below the twilight zone. J Mol Biol 307:721–735
Blundell TL, Sibanda BL, Sternberg MJ, et al. (1987) Knowledge-based prediction of protein structures and the design of novel molecules. Nature 326:347–352
Boissel JP, Lee WR, Presnell SR, et al. (1993) Erythropoietin structure-function relationships. Mutant proteins that test a model of tertiary structure. J Biol Chem 268:15983–15993
Bonneau R, Baker D (2001) Ab initio protein structure prediction: progress and prospects. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 30:173–189
Bowie JU, Luthy R, Eisenberg D (1991) A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three- dimensional structure. Science 253:164–170
Braun W, Go N (1985) Calculation of protein conformations by proton-proton distance con straints. A new efficient algorithm. J Mol Biol 186:611–626
Brenner SE, Chothia C, Hubbard TJ (1998) Assessing sequence comparison methods with reliable structurally identified distant evolutionary relationships. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:6073–6078
Brooks CL, III, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, et al. (1983) CHARMM:A program for macromo lecular energy minimization and dynamics calculations. J Comp Chem 4:187–217
Browne WJ, North ACT, Phillips DC, et al. (1969) A possible three-dimensional structure of bovine lactalbumin based on that of hen's egg-white lysosyme. J Mol Biol 42:65–86
Bruccoleri RE, Karplus M (1987) Prediction of the folding of short polypeptide segments by uni form conformational sampling. Biopolymers 26:137–168
Bruccoleri RE, Karplus M (1990) Conformational sampling using high-temperature molecular dynamics. Biopolymers 29:1847–1862
Bujnicki JM, Elofsson A, Fischer D, et al. (2001) LiveBench-1: continuous benchmarking of pro tein structure prediction servers. Protein Sci 10:352–362
Burley SK, Almo SC, Bonanno JB, et al. (1999) Structural genomics: beyond the human genome project. Nat Genet 23:151–157
Burley SK, Joachimiak A, Montelione GT, et al. (2008) Contributions to the NIH-NIGMS protein structure initiative from the PSI production centers. Structure 16:5–11
Bystroff C, Baker D (1998) Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence structure motifs. J Mol Biol 281:565–577
Chakravarty S, Sanchez R (2004) Systematic analysis of added-value in simple comparative mod els of protein structure. Structure 12:1461–1470
Chakravarty S, Wang L, Sanchez R (2005) Accuracy of structure-derived properties in simple comparative models of protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 33:244–259
Chance MR, Bresnick AR, Burley SK, et al. (2002) Structural genomics: a pipeline for providing structures for the biologist. Protein Sci 11:723–738
Chinea G, Padron G, Hooft RW, et al. (1995) The use of position-specific rotamers in model build ing by homology. Proteins 23:415–421
Chivian D, Baker D (2006) Homology modeling using parametric alignment ensemble generation with consensus and energy-based model selection. Nucleic Acids Res 34:e112
Chothia C, Lesk AM (1986) The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J 5:823–826
Chothia C, Lesk AM (1987) Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobu lins. J Mol Biol 196:901–917
Chothia C, Lesk AM, Tramontano A, et al. (1989) Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervaria ble regions. Nature 342:877–883
Chothia C, Gough J, Vogel C, et al. (2003) Evolution of the protein repertoire. Science 300:1701–1703
Claessens M, Van Cutsem E, Lasters I, et al. (1989) Modelling the polypeptide backbone with ‘spare parts’ from known protein structures. Protein Eng 2:335–345
Clore GM, Brunger AT, Karplus M, et al. (1986) Application of molecular dynamics with inter proton distance restraints to three-dimensional protein structure determination. A model study of crambin. J Mol Biol 191:523–551
Clore GM, Robien MA, Gronenborn AM (1993) Exploring the limits of precision and accuracy of protein structures determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Mol Biol 231:82–102
Cohen FE, Kuntz ID: Tertiary structure prediction, in Prediction of protein structure and the principles of protein conformations. Edited by Fasman GD. New York, Plenum, 1989, pp. 647–705
Collura V, Higo J, Garnier J (1993) Modeling of protein loops by simulated annealing. Protein Sci 2:1502–1510
Contreras-Moreira B, Fitzjohn PW, Offman M, et al. (2003) Novel use of a genetic algorithm for protein structure prediction: searching template and sequence alignment space. Proteins 53(Suppl 6):424–429
Dalton JA, Jackson RM (2007) An evaluation of automated homology modelling methods at low target template sequence similarity. Bioinformatics 23:1901–1908
Das B, Meirovitch H (2003) Solvation parameters for predicting the structure of surface loops in proteins: transferability and entropic effects. Proteins 51:470–483
Das R, Qian B, Raman S, et al. (2007) Structure prediction for CASP7 targets using extensive all atom refinement with Rosetta@home. Proteins 69(Suppl 8):118–128
de Bakker PI, DePristo MA, Burke DF, et al. (2003) Ab initio construction of polypeptide frag ments: accuracy of loop decoy discrimination by an all-atom statistical potential and the AMBER force field with the Generalized Born solvation model. Proteins 51:21–40
Deane CM, Blundell TL (2001) CODA: a combined algorithm for predicting the structurally vari able regions of protein models. Protein Sci 10:599–612
DePristo MA, de Bakker PI, Lovell SC, et al. (2003) Ab initio construction of polypeptide frag ments: efficient generation of accurate, representative ensembles. Proteins 51:41–55
Dill KA, Chan HS (1997) From Levinthal to pathways to funnels. Nat Struct Biol 4:10–19
Do CB, Mahabhashyam MS, Brudno M, et al. (2005) ProbCons: Probabilistic consistency-based multiple sequence alignment. Genome Res 15:330–340
Du P, Andrec M, Levy RM (2003) Have we seen all structures corresponding to short protein fragments in the Protein Data Bank? An update. Protein Eng 16:407–414
Edgar RC, Batzoglou S (2006) Multiple sequence alignment. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16:368–373
Edgar RC, Sjolander K (2003) SATCHMO: sequence alignment and tree construction using hid den Markov models. Bioinformatics 19:1404–1411
Edgar RC, Sjolander K (2004) COACH: profile-profile alignment of protein families using hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 20:1309–1318
Eisenberg D, Luthy R, Bowie JU (1997) VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three dimensional profiles. Method Enzymol 277:396–404
Eramian D, Shen M Y, Devos D, et al. (2006) A composite score for predicting errors in protein structure models. Protein Sci 15:1653–1666
Espadaler J, Fernandez-Fuentes N, Hermoso A, et al. (2004) ArchDB: automated protein loop classification as a tool for structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D185–188
Evers A, Gohlke H, Klebe G (2003) Ligand-supported homology modelling of protein binding sites using knowledge-based potentials. J Mol Biol 334:327–345
Eyrich VA, Marti-Renom MA, Przybylski D, et al. (2001) EVA: continuous automatic evaluation of protein structure prediction servers. Bioinformatics 17:1242–1243
Faber HR, Matthews BW (1990) A mutant T4 lysozyme displays five different crystal conforma tions. Nature 348:263–266
Fasnacht M, Zhu J, Honig B (2007) Local quality assessment in homology models using statistical potentials and support vector machines. Protein Sci 16:1557–1568
Felsenstein J (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17:368–376
Fernandez-Fuentes N, Fiser A (2006) Saturating representation of loop conformational fragments in structure databanks. BMC Struct Biol 6:15
Fernandez-Fuentes N, Oliva B, Fiser A (2006a) A supersecondary structure library and search algorithm for modeling loops in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 34:2085–2097
Fernandez-Fuentes N, Zhai J, Fiser A (2006b) ArchPRED: a template based loop structure predic tion server. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W173–176
Fernandez-Fuentes N, Madrid-Aliste CJ, Rai BK, et al. (2007a) M4T: a comparative protein struc ture modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W363–368
Fernandez-Fuentes N, Rai BK, Madrid-Aliste CJ, et al. (2007b) Comparative protein structure modeling by combining multiple templates and optimizing sequence-to-structure alignments. Bioinformatics 23:2558–2565
Fidelis K, Stern PS, Bacon D, et al. (1994) Comparison of systematic search and database methods for constructing segments of protein structure. Protein Eng 7:953–960
Fine RM, Wang H, Shenkin PS, et al. (1986) Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conforma tions. II: minimization and molecular dynamics studies of MCPC603 from many randomly generated loop conformations. Proteins 1:342–362
Finkelstein AV, Reva BA (1991) A search for the most stable folds of protein chains. Nature 351:497–499
Fiser A (2004) Protein structure modeling in the proteomics era. Expert Rev Proteomics 1:97–110
Fiser A, Sali A (2003a) Modeller: generation and refinement of homology-based protein structure models. Method Enzymol 374:461–491
Fiser A, Sali A (2003b) ModLoop: automated modeling of loops in protein structures. Bioinformatics 19:2500–2501
Fiser A, Do RK, Sali A (2000) Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci 9:1753–1773
Fiser A, Feig M, Brooks CL, III, et al. (2002) Evolution and physics in comparative protein struc ture modeling. Acc Chem Res 35:413–421
Fiser A, Filipe SR, Tomasz A (2003) Cell wall branches, penicillin resistance and the secrets of the MurM protein. Trends Microbiol 11:547–553
Fogolari F, Tosatto SC (2005) Application of MM/PBSA colony free energy to loop decoy dis crimination: toward correlation between energy and root mean square deviation. Protein Sci 14:889–901
Forrest LR, Woolf TB (2003) Discrimination of native loop conformations in membrane proteins: decoy library design and evaluation of effective energy scoring functions. Proteins 52:492–509
Ginalski K (2006) Comparative modeling for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16:172–177
Ginalski K, Elofsson A, Fischer D, et al. (2003) 3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 19:1015–1018
Grabarek Z (2006) Structural basis for diversity of the EF-hand calcium-binding proteins. J Mol Biol 359:509–525
Greene LH, Lewis TE, Addou S, et al. (2007) The CATH domain structure database: new proto cols and classification levels give a more comprehensive resource for exploring evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D291–297
Greer J (1981) Comparative model-building of the mammalian serine proteases. J Mol Biol 153:1027–1042
Greer J (1990) Comparative modeling methods: application to the family of the mammalian serine proteases. Proteins 7:317–334
Guenther B, Onrust R, Sali A, et al. (1997) Crystal structure of the alpha-subunit of the clamp loader complex of E. coli DNA polymerase III. Cell 91:335–345
Han R, Leo-Macias A, Zerbino D, et al. (2008) An efficient conformational sampling method for homology modeling. Proteins 71:175–188
Havel TF, Snow ME (1991) A new method for building protein conformations from sequence alignments with homologues of known structure. J Mol Biol 217:1–7
Henikoff JG, Pietrokovski S, McCallum CM, et al. (2000) Blocks-based methods for detecting protein homology. Electrophoresis 21:1700–1706
Henikoff S, Henikoff JG (1992) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:10915–10919
Holm L, Sander C (1991) Database algorithm for generating protein backbone and side-chain co ordinates from a C alpha trace application to model building and detection of co-ordinate errors. J Mol Biol 218:183–194
Hooft RW, Vriend G, Sander C, et al. (1996) Errors in protein structures. Nature 381:272
Jacobson MP, Pincus DL, Rapp CS, et al. (2004) A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction. Proteins 55:351–367
Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Zhang B, et al. (1998) Fold prediction by a hierarchy of sequence, threading, and modeling methods. Protein Sci 7:1431–1440
Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Godzik A (2000) Improving the quality of twilight-zone align ments. Protein Sci 9:1487–1496
Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Li Z, et al. (2005) FFAS03: a server for profile-profile sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W284–288
Jauch R, Yeo HC, Kolatkar PR, et al. (2007) Assessment of CASP7 structure predictions for tem plate free targets. Proteins 69(Suppl 8):57–67
Jennings AJ, Edge CM, Sternberg MJ (2001) An approach to improving multiple alignments of protein sequences using predicted secondary structure. Protein Eng 14:227–231
John B, Sali A (2003) Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3982–3992
John B, Sali A (2004) Detection of homologous proteins by an intermediate sequence search. Protein Sci 13:54–62
Johnson LN, Lowe ED, Noble ME, et al. (1998) The Eleventh Datta Lecture. The structural basis for substrate recognition and control by protein kinases. FEBS Lett 430:1–11
Jones DT (1999) GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol 287:797–815
Jones TA, Thirup S (1986) Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallog raphy. EMBO J 5:819–822
Karchin R, Cline M, Mandel-Gutfreund Y, et al. (2003) Hidden Markov models that use pre dicted local structure for fold recognition: alphabets of backbone geometry. Proteins 51:504–514
Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R (1998) Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 14:846–856
Karplus K, Katzman S, Shackleford G, et al. (2005) SAM-T04: what is new in protein-structure prediction for CASP6. Proteins 61(Suppl 7):135–142
Kihara D, Skolnick J (2003) The PDB is a covering set of small protein structures. J Mol Biol 334:793–802
Kiselar JG, Janmey PA, Almo SC, et al. (2003) Structural analysis of gelsolin using synchrotron protein footprinting. Mol Cell Proteomics 2:1120–1132
Koehl P, Delarue M (1995) A self consistent mean field approach to simultaneous gap closure and side-chain positioning in homology modelling. Nat Struct Biol 2:163–170
Kolinski A, Bujnicki JM (2005) Generalized protein structure prediction based on combination of fold-recognition with de novo folding and evaluation of models. Proteins 61(Suppl 7):84–90
Kolinski A, Betancourt MR, Kihara D, et al. (2001) Generalized comparative modeling (GENECOMP): a combination of sequence comparison, threading, and lattice modeling for protein structure prediction and refinement. Proteins 44:133–149
Kopp J, Schwede T (2006) The SWISS-MODEL Repository: new features and functionalities. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D315–318
Kopp J, Bordoli L, Battey JN, et al. (2007) Assessment of CASP7 predictions for template-based modeling targets. Proteins 69(Suppl 8):38–56
Krogh A, Brown M, Mian IS, et al. (1994) Hidden Markov models in computational biology. Applications to protein modeling. J Mol Biol 235:1501–1531
Laskowski RA, Moss DS, Thornton JM (1993) Main-chain bond lengths and bond angles in pro tein structures. J Mol Biol 231:1049–1067
Lesk AM (1995) NAD-binding domains of dehydrogenases. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5:775–783
Lesk AM, Chothia C (1980) How different amino acid sequences determine similar protein struc tures: the structure and evolutionary dynamics of the globins. J Mol Biol 136:225–270
Levitt M (1992) Accurate modeling of protein conformation by automatic segment matching. J Mol Biol 226:507–533
Luthy R, McLachlan AD, Eisenberg D (1991) Secondary structure-based profiles: use of structure-conserving scoring tables in searching protein sequence databases for structural similarities. Proteins 10:229–239
Manjasetty BA, Shi W, Zhan C, et al. (2007) A high-throughput approach to protein structure analysis. Genet Eng (NY) 28:105–128
Marti-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, et al. (2000) Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 29:291–325
Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Fiser A, et al. (2002) Reliability of assessment of protein structure prediction methods. Structure(Camb) 10:435–440
Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Sali A (2004) Alignment of protein sequences by their profiles. Protein Sci 13:1071–1087
Melo F, Feytmans E (1997) Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at atomic level. J Mol Biol 267:207–222
Mezei M (1998) Chameleon sequences in the PDB. Protein Eng 11:411–414
Michalsky E, Goede A, Preissner R (2003) Loops In Proteins (LIP)-a comprehensive loop data base for homology modelling. Protein Eng 16:979–985
Moretti S, Armougom F, Wallace IM, et al. (2007) The M-Coffee web server: a meta-method for computing multiple sequence alignments by combining alternative alignment methods. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W645–648
Moult J (2005) A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure pre diction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15:285–289
Moult J, James MN (1986) An algorithm for determining the conformation of polypeptide seg ments in proteins by systematic search. Proteins 1:146–163
Notredame C (2007) Recent evolutions of multiple sequence alignment algorithms. PLoS Comput Biol 3:e123
Ohlendorf DH (1994) Accuracy of refined protein structures. Comparison of four independently refined models of human interleukin 1 beta. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr D50:808–812
Oliva B, Bates PA, Querol E, et al. (1997) An automated classification of the structure of protein loops. J Mol Biol 266:814–830
Orr GA, Rao S, Swindell CS, et al. (1998) Photoaffinity labeling approach to map the Taxol-bind-ing site on the microtubule. Method Enzymol 298:238–252
Pearson WR (2000) Flexible sequence similarity searching with the FASTA3 program package. Method Mol Biol 132:185–219
Pei J, Grishin NV (2007) PROMALS: towards accurate multiple sequence alignments of distantly related proteins. Bioinformatics 23:802–808
Pei J, Kim BH, Grishin NV (2008) PROMALS3D: a tool for multiple protein sequence and struc ture alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 36:2295–2300
Peng HP, Yang AS (2007) Modeling protein loops with knowledge-based prediction of sequence-structure alignment. Bioinformatics 23:2836–2842
Petrey D, Honig B (2005) Protein structure prediction: inroads to biology. Mol Cell 20:811–819
Petrey D, Xiang Z, Tang CL, et al. (2003) Using multiple structure alignments, fast model build ing, and energetic analysis in fold recognition and homology modeling. Proteins 53(Suppl 6):430–435
Pieper U, Eswar N, Davis FP, et al. (2006) MODBASE: a database of annotated comparative pro tein structure models and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D291–295
Pillardy J, Czaplewski C, Liwo A, et al. (2001) Recent improvements in prediction of protein structure by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:2329–23233
Qian B, Ortiz AR, Baker D (2004) Improvement of comparative model accuracy by free-energy optimization along principal components of natural structural variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15346–15351
Rai BK, Fiser A (2006) Multiple mapping method: a novel approach to the sequence-to-structure alignment problem in comparative protein structure modeling. Proteins 63:644–661
Rai BK, Madrid-Aliste CJ, Fajardo JE, et al. (2006) MMM: a sequence-to-structure alignment protocol. Bioinformatics 22:2691–2692
Reddy BV, Li WW, Shindyalov IN, et al. (2001) Conserved key amino acid positions (CKAAPs) derived from the analysis of common substructures in proteins. Proteins 42:148–163
Ring CS, Cohen FE (1993) Modeling protein structures: construction and their applications. FASEB J 7:783–890
Ring CS, Sun E, McKerrow JH, et al. (1993) Structure-based inhibitor design by using protein models for the development of antiparasitic agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:3583–3587
Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Chivian D, et al. (2004) Modeling structurally variable regions in homolo gous proteins with rosetta. Proteins 55:656–677
Rost B (1997) Protein structures sustain evolutionary drift. Fold Des 2:S19–S24
Rost B (1999) Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng 12:85–94
Rudolph MG, Stanfield RL, Wilson IA (2006) How TCRs bind MHCs, peptides, and coreceptors. Annu Rev Immunol 24:419–466
Rusch DB, Halpern AL, Sutton G, et al. (2007) The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling expedi tion: northwest Atlantic through eastern tropical Pacific. PLoS Biol 5:e77
Rychlewski L, Jaroszewski L, Li W, et al. (2000) Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci 9:232–241
Rykunov D, Fiser A (2007) Effects of amino acid composition, finite size of proteins, and sparse statistics on distance-dependent statistical pair potentials. Proteins 67:559–568
Sali A, Blundell TL (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 234:779–815
Sali A, Matsumoto R, McNeil HP, et al. (1993) Three-dimensional models of four mouse mast cell chymases. Identification of proteoglycan binding regions and protease-specific antigenic epitopes. J Biol Chem 268:9023–9034
Sali A, Shakhnovich E, Karplus M (1994) How does a protein fold?. Nature 369:248–251
Samudrala R, Moult J (1998) A graph-theoretic algorithm for comparative modeling of protein structure. J Mol Biol 279:287–302
Sanchez R, Sali A (1997) Evaluation of comparative protein structure modeling by MODELLER-3. Proteins(Suppl 1):50–58
Sanchez R, Sali A (1998) Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:13597–13602
Sangar V, Blankenberg DJ, Altman N, et al. (2007) Quantitative sequence-function relationships in proteins based on gene ontology. BMC Bioinformatics 8:294
Saraste M, Sibbald PR, Wittinghofer A (1990) The P-loop-a common motif in ATP- and GTP-binding proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 15:430–434
Sauder JM, Arthur JW, Dunbrack RL, Jr. (2000) Large-scale comparison of protein sequence alignment algorithms with structure alignments. Proteins 40:6–22
Schaffer AA, Aravind L, Madden TL, et al. (2001) Improving the accuracy of PSI-BLAST protein database searches with composition-based statistics and other refinements. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2994–3005
Schwarzenbacher R, Godzik A, Jaroszewski L (2008) The JCSG MR pipeline: optimized align ments, multiple models and parallel searches. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 64:133–140
Sheng Y, Sali A, Herzog H, et al. (1996) Site-directed mutagenesis of recombinant human beta 2-glycoprotein I identifies a cluster of lysine residues that are critical for phospholipid binding and anti-cardiolipin antibody activity. J Immunol 157:3744–3751
Shenkin PS, Yarmush DL, Fine RM, et al. (1987) Predicting antibody hypervariable loop confor mation. I. Ensembles of random conformations for ringlike structures. Biopolymers 26:2053–2085
Shi J, Blundell TL, Mizuguchi K (2001) FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J Mol Biol 310:243–257
Sibanda BL, Blundell TL, Thornton JM (1989) Conformation of beta-hairpins in protein struc tures. A systematic classification with applications to modelling by homology, electron density fitting and protein engineering. J Mol Biol 206:759–777
Sippl MJ (1990) Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 213:859–883
Sippl MJ (1993) Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 17:355–362
Sippl MJ (1995) Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5:229–235
Soto CS, Fasnacht M, Zhu J, et al. (2008) Loop modeling: Sampling, filtering, and scoring. Proteins 70:834–843
Srinivasan N, Blundell TL (1993) An evaluation of the performance of an automated procedure for comparative modelling of protein tertiary structure. Protein Eng 6:501–512
Summa CM, Levitt M (2007) Near-native structure refinement using in vacuo energy minimiza tion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3177–3182
Sutcliffe MJ, Haneef I, Carney D, et al. (1987) Knowledge based modelling of homologous pro teins, Part I: three-dimensional frameworks derived from the simultaneous superposition of multiple structures. Protein Eng 1:377–384
Sutcliffe MJ, Dobson CM, Oswald RE (1992) Solution structure of neuronal bungarotoxin deter mined by two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy: calculation of tertiary structure using system atic homologous model building, dynamical simulated annealing, and restrained molecular dynamics. Biochemistry 31:2962–2970
Tainer JA, Thayer MM, Cunningham RP (1995) DNA repair proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5:20–26
Taylor WR, Hatrick K (1994) Compensating changes in protein multiple sequence alignments. Protein Eng 7:341–348
Terashi G, Takeda-Shitaka M, Kanou K, et al. (2007) Fams-ace: a combined method to select the best model after remodeling all server models. Proteins 69(Suppl 8):98–107
Todd AE, Orengo CA, Thornton JM (2001) Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J Mol Biol 307:1113–1143
Todd AE, Orengo CA, Thornton JM (2002) Plasticity of enzyme active sites. Trends Biochem Sci 27:419–426
Topf M, Lasker K, Webb B, et al. (2008) Protein structure fitting and refinement guided by cryo-EM density. Structure 16:295–307
Topham CM, McLeod A, Eisenmenger F, et al. (1993) Fragment ranking in modelling of protein structure. Conformationally constrained environmental amino acid substitution tables. J Mol Biol 229:194–220
Unger R, Harel D, Wherland S, et al. (1989) A 3D building blocks approach to analyzing and pre dicting structure of proteins. Proteins 5:355–373
Vakser IA (1995) Protein docking for low-resolution structures. Protein Eng 8:371–377
van Gelder CW, Leusen FJ, Leunissen JA, et al. (1994) A molecular dynamics approach for the generation of complete protein structures from limited coordinate data. Proteins 18:174–185
van Vlijmen HW, Karplus M (1997) PDB-based protein loop prediction: parameters for selection and methods for optimization. J Mol Biol 267:975–1001
Venclovas C, Margelevicius M (2005) Comparative modeling in CASP6 using consensus approach to template selection, sequence-structure alignment, and structure assessment. Proteins 61:99–105
Venter JC, Remington K, Heidelberg JF, et al. (2004) Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 304:66–74
Vernal J, Fiser A, Sali A, et al. (2002) Probing the specificity of a trypanosomal aromatic alpha hydroxy acid dehydrogenase by site-directed mutagenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 293:633–639
Vitkup D, Melamud E, Moult J, et al. (2001) Completeness in structural genomics. Nat Struct Biol 8:559–566
Wallner B, Elofsson A (2005a) Pcons5: combining consensus, structural evaluation and fold rec ognition scores. Bioinformatics 21:4248–4254
Wallner B, Elofsson A (2005b) All are not equal: a benchmark of different homology modeling programs. Protein Sci 14:1315–1327
Wallner B, Elofsson A (2007) Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP7 using Pcons and ProQ. Proteins 69(Suppl 8):184–193
Wallner B, Larsson P, Elofsson A (2007) Pcons.net: protein structure prediction meta server. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W369–374
Wlodawer A, Miller M, Jaskolski M, et al. (1989) Conserved folding in retroviral proteases: crys tal structure of a synthetic HIV-1 protease. Science 245:616–621
Wu CH, Apweiler R, Bairoch A, et al. (2006) The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt): an expanding universe of protein information. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D187–191
Wu G, Fiser A, ter Kuile B, et al. (1999) Convergent evolution of Trichomonas vaginalis lactate dehydrogenase from malate dehydrogenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:6285–6290
Wu G, McArthur AG, Fiser A, et al. (2000) Core histones of the amitochondriate protist, Giardia lamblia. Mol Biol Evol 17:1156–1163
Xiang Z, Soto CS, Honig B (2002) Evaluating conformational free energies: The colony energy and its application to the problem of loop prediction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:7432–7437
Xiao H, Verdier-Pinard P, Fernandez-Fuentes N, et al. (2006) Insights into the mechanism of microtubule stabilization by Taxol. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:10166–10173
Xu J, Jiao F, Yu L (2007) Protein structure prediction using threading. Methods Mol Biol 413:91–122
Xu LZ, Sanchez R, Sali A, et al. (1996) Ligand specificity of brain lipid-binding protein. J Biol Chem 271:24711–24719
Yooseph S, Sutton G, Rusch DB, et al. (2007) The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling expedition: expanding the universe of protein families. PLoS Biol 5:e16
Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y (2004) Accurate and efficient loop selections by the DFIRE-based all-atom statistical potential. Protein Sci 13:391–399
Zhang Y (2007) Template-based modeling and free modeling by I-TASSER in CASP7. Proteins 69(Suppl 8):108–117
Zheng Q, Rosenfeld R, Vajda S, et al. (1993) Determining protein loop conformation using scal ing-relaxation techniques. Protein Sci 2:1242–1248
Zhou H, Pandit SB, Lee SY, et al. (2007) Analysis of TASSER-based CASP7 protein structure prediction results. Proteins 69(Suppl 8):90–97
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fiser, A. (2009). Comparative Protein Structure Modelling. In: Rigden, D.J. (eds) From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9058-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9058-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9057-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9058-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)