Skip to main content

Understanding and Addressing Achievement Gaps During the First Four Years of School in the United States

  • Chapter
International Studies in Educational Inequality, Theory and Policy

Abstract

One of the most urgent educational challenges in the United States is eliminating the large achievement differences among racial and ethnic groups (Jencks & Phillips 1998; Lee 2002; Rothstein 2004; Thernstrom & Thernstrom 2003). Although this challenge has existed throughout the history of the country, it has taken on increased urgency in the current era of educational accountability. This urgency is perhaps best reflected in the landmark federal legislation, the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, which requires annual testing of students and holds schools and districts accountable for demonstrating annual progress in improving the achievement of all students. In fact, one goal of NCLB includes, “closing the achievement gap between high- and low-performing children, especially the achievement gaps between minority and non-minority students, and between disadvantaged children and their more advantaged peers” (U.S. Dept. of Education 2003: Title 1, Sec. 1001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armor, D. (2003). Maximizing intelligence. Somerset, NJ: Transaction publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, P.T. and Webb, R.B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. S. (1995). Long-term effects of early childhood programs on cognitive and school outcomes. The Future of Children, 5, 25-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, J. R., Rueben, K.S. and Danenberg, A. (2000). Equal resources, equal outcomes? The distribution of school resources and student achievement in California. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1967). Toward open schools. Public Interest, 9, 20-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Equality and achievement in education. San Francisco: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, F., Weinfeld, F., & York, R. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J. & Duncan, T. (1995). Does Head Start make a difference? American Economic Review, 85, 341-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B. and Thoreson, A. (2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 57-77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J.B., Randolph, A., & Spillane, J.P. (2004). Teachers’ expectations and sense of responsibility for student learning: The importance of race, class, and organizational habitus. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35, 75-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, S. M., Ritter, P.L., Leiderman, P.H., Roberts, D.F. and Fraleigh, M.J. (1987). The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Development, 58,1244-1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, D.B., von Hippel, P.T., & Broh, B.A. (2004). Are schools the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year. American Sociological Review, 69, 613-635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., & Olson, L. S. (1997). Children, schools, and inequality. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwisle, D. R. and Alexander, K.L. (1995). A parent’s economic shadow: Family structure versus family resources as influences on early school achievement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57,399-409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, G. (2003). Racial disparities and discrimination in education: What do we know, how do we know it, and what do we need to know? Teachers College Record, 105, 1119-1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. F. (1998a). Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the black-white test score gap. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The black-white test score gap (pp.273-317). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. F. (1998b). Can schools narrow the black-white test score gap? In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The black-white test score gap (pp.318-374). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, Jr. R. & Levitt, S. (2004). Understanding the black-white test score gap in the first two years of school. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 447-468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallimore, R. and Goldenberg, C. (2001). Analyzing cultural models and settings to connect achievement and school improvement research. Educational Psychologist, 36, 45-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gándara, P., Rumberger, R., Maxwell-Jolly, J. and Callahan, R. (2003). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11.Retrieved September 6, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n36/

  • Guo, G. and Harris, K. (2000). The mechanisms mediating the effects of poverty on children’s intellectual development. Demography, 37, 431-447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 141-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L.V., Laine, R.D. & Greenwald, R. (1994). Does money matter? A Meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 5-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. & Phillips, M. (Eds.) (1998). The black-white test score gap. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C., Smith, M., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B. & Michelson, S. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effects of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, G. and Tienda, M. (1995). Optimism and achievement: The educational performance of immigrant youth. Social Science Quarterly, 76,1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2002). Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity? Educational Researcher, 31,3-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. and Bryk, A. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 172-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V.E., Burkam, D.T., Ready, D.D., Honigman, J., & Meisels, S.J. (2006). Full-day versus half-day kindergarten: In which program do students learn more? American Journal of Education, 112, 163-208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V., Dedrick, R. and Smith, J. (1991). The effect of social organization of schools on teachers’ efficacy and satisfaction. Sociology of Education, 64,190-208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V., Smith, J. and Croninger, R. (1997). How high school organization influences the equitable distribution of learning in mathematics and science. Sociology of Education, 70, 128-150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. and Smith, J. (1999). Social support and achievement for young adolescents in Chicago: The role of school academic press. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 907-945.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeal, R.B. (1999). Parental involvement as social capital: Differential effectiveness on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out. Social Forces, 78, 117-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, D.C.: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F., Rutter, R. and Smith, M. (1989). Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, community, and expectations. Sociology of Education, 62, 221-238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogbu, J. U. (1992). Understanding cultural diversity and learning. Educational Researcher, 21, 5-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orfield, G. & Lee, C. (2006). Racial transformation and the changing nature of segregation. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, E. & Palardy, G. J. (2004). Impact of parental involvement and authoritativeness on academic achievement: A cross ethnic comparison. In S.J. Paik & H. Walberg (Eds.), Advancing educational productivity: Policy implications from national databases (pp.95-122). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. (1997). What makes schools effective? A comparison of the relationships of communitarian climate and academic climate to mathematics achievement and attendance during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 633-662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods.2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F. (2003). Sources of educational inequality: The growth of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic test score gaps in kindergarten and first grade. University Park, PA: Population Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscigno, V. J. (2000). Family/school inequality and African-American/Hispanic achievement. Social Problems, 47, 266-290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the black-white achievement gap. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B., Raudenbush, S. and Kang, S. (1991). Organizational design in high schools: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Education, 99, 238-266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumberger R.W. & Palardy, G.J. (2004). Multilevel models for school effectiveness research. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences(pp.235-258). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumberger R.W. & Palardy, G.J. (2005). Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teachers College Record, 107,1999-2045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, J. & Thum, Y.M. (2004). Paying for high- and low-quality teaching. Economics of Education Review, 23, 411-430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, T. D., Tan, A. G., & Hoffman, C. M. (2006). Digest of Education Statistics, 2005. (NCES 2006-030) U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L, Dornbusch, S. and Brown, B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement. American Psychologist, 47, 723-729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez-Orozco, M. and Suarez-Orozco, C. (1995). The cultural patterning of achievement motivation: A comparison of Mexican, Mexican immigrant, Mexican American, and non-Latino White American students. In R. Rumbaut and W. Cornelius (Eds.) California’s Immigrant Children: Theory, Research, and Implications for Educational Policy (pp. 161-190). San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sui-Chu, E.H. and Willms, J. (1996). Effects of parental involvement on eighth grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69, 126-141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thernstrom, S. & Thernstrom, A. (2003). No excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2002). A league table of educational disadvantage in rich nations. Innocenti Report CardNo.4. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2005). Child poverty in rich countries. Innocenti Report CardNo. 6. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2003). No Child Left Behind. Retrieved June 23, 2003, from: http://www.nochildleftbehind.gov/next/overview/index.html.

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). America’s Kindergartners, NCES 2000-070. By K. Denton & E. Germino-Hausken. Washington, D.C.: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Digest of Education Statistics, 2002. Washington, D.C.: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). User’s manual for the ECLS-K third grade public-use data files and electronic codebook. Washington, D.C.: Author.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rumberger, R.W., Arellano, B. (2007). Understanding and Addressing Achievement Gaps During the First Four Years of School in the United States. In: Teese, R., Lamb, S., Duru-Bellat, M., Helme, S. (eds) International Studies in Educational Inequality, Theory and Policy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5916-2_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics