Skip to main content

Coping With Alternate Formulations Of Questions And Answers

  • Chapter
Advances in Open Domain Question Answering

We present in this chapter the QALC system which has participated in the four TREC QA evaluations. We focus here on the problem of linguistic variation in order to be able to relate questions and answers. We present first, variation at the term level which consists in retrieving questions terms in document sentences even if morphologic, syntactic or semantic variations alter them. Our second subject matter concerns variation at the sentence level that we handle as different partial reformulations of questions. Questions are associated with extraction patterns based on the question syntactic type and the object that is under query. We present the whole system thus allowing situating how QALC deals with variation, and different evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

10. References

  • Abney, S. (1996), Partial Parsing via Finite-State Cascades. Natural Language Engineering,2 (4), 337-344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aït-Mokhtar, S. & Chanod, J-P. (1997). Incremental finite-state parsing. Proceedings of Applied Natural Language, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aït-Mokhtar, S., Chanod, J-P. & Roux, C. (2002). Robustness beyond Shallowness: Incremental Deep Parsing. Natural Language Engineering, special issue on Robust Methods in Analysis of Natural Language Data, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpha, S., Dixon, P., Liao, C. & Yang, C. (2001). Oracle at TREC 10: Filtering and Question-Answering. In: Proceedings of Text retrieval conference, TREC 10. Gaithersburg, MD. NIST Eds, pp. 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelt, D., Hobbs, J., Bear, J., Israel, D., Kameyama, M., Kehler, A. et al. (1995 ) SRI International FASTUS system: MUC-6 test results and analysis. Proceedings of the 6 th Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6), Morgan Kaufman, pp. 237-248.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARPA. (1992). Advanced Research Projects Agency. Proceedings of the Fourth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-4). San Francisco, California, Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARPA. (1996). Advanced Research Projects Agency. Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6). San Francisco, California, Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzilay, R. & McKeown, K. R. (2001). Extracting Paraphrases from a Parallel Corpus. Proceedings of ACL-EACL’01, Toulouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berri, J., Mollá Aliod, D. & Hess M. (1998). Extraction automatique de réponses: implémentations du système ExtrAns. Proceedings of the fifth conference TALN 1998 (Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles), Paris, pp. 12-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwick, R.C. (1991). Principles of principle-based parsing. In Berwick, R.C., Abney, S.P., & Tenny, C. (Eds.), Principle-Based Parsing Computation and Psycholinguistics (pp. 1-38). Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D. (1993). Using Register-Diversified Corpora for General Language Studies, Computational Linguistics, 19 (2), 219-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill, E. (1993). A Corpus Based Approach To Language Learning, PhD Dissertation, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busemann, S. (1996). Best-First Surface Realization, Proceedings of the 8 th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Herstmonceux, Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway, C.B. & Lester, J.C. (2001). Narrative Prose Generation. Proceedings of the 8th IJCAI 2001, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • CELEX. (1998). Consortium for Lexical Resources, University of Pennsylvania. From http://www. ldc.upenn.edu/readme_files/celex.readme.html.

  • Clarke, C.L.A., Cormack, G.V., Kisman, D.I.E. & Lynam, T.R., Question answering by passage selection, Proceedings of the Text retrieval conference, TREC9, Gaithersburg, MD. NIST Eds.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLR (1998) Consortium for Lexical Resources, NMSUs, Eds., New Mexico. From http://crl.nmsu. edu/cgi-bin/Tools/CLR/clrcat#D3.

  • Collins, M. (1996). A New Statistical Parser Based on Bigram Lexical Dependencies. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL-96, pp.184-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabre, C. & Jacquemin, C. (2000). Boosting variant recognition with light semantics. Proceedings of COLING 2000, Luxemburg, pp. 264-270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferret, O., Grau, B., Hurault-Plantet, M., Illouz, G., Jacquemin, C. (2001). Document selection refinement based on linguistic features for QALC, a question answering system, Proceedings of the Euroconference on Recent Advances in Natural language Processing (RANLP), Tsigov Chark, Bulgaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaizauskas, R. & Wilks, Y. (1997). Information Extraction: Beyond Document Retrieval. Technical report CS-97-10, Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Halteren H., Zavrel J. and Daelemans W. (1998) Improving Data Driven Wordclass Tagging by System Combination, ACL-COLING’98, pp. 491-497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harabagiu, S., Pasca, M., Maiorano, J. (2000). Experiments with Open-Domain Textual Question Answering. Proceedings of Coling’2000, Saarbrucken, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harabagiu, S., Moldovan, D., Pasca, M., Surdeanu, M., Mihalcea, R., Girju, R., Rus, V., Lactusu, F., Morarescu, P., Bunescu, R. (2001) Answering Complex, List and Context Questions with LCC’s Question-Answering Server, Proceedings of the Text retrieval conference, TREC 10, Gaithersburg, MD. NIST Eds., pp. 355-361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J.R. (1993). The Generic Information Extraction System. Proceedings of the Fifth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-5) (pp. 87-91), Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs Appelt, Bear Israel, Kameyama Stickel & Tyson (1996). FASTUS: A Cascaded Finite-State Transducer for Extracting Information from Natural-Language Text, in: Roche and Schabes, eds., Finite State Devices for Natural Language Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovy, E. (1996). Language generation, overview. In Survey of the State of the Art in Human Language Technology (chap. 4.1). From http://cslu.cse.ogi.edu/HLTsurvey/HLTsurvey.html.

  • Hovy, E., Hermjacob, U. & Lin C-Y., Ravichandran, D. (2001a). Towards Semantics-Based Answer Pinpointing, DARPA Human Technology Conference (HLT), San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovy, E., Hermjacob, U. & Lin C-Y. (2001b). The Use of External Knowledge in Factoid QA. Proceedings of the Text retrieval conference, TREC 10, Gaithersburg, MD. NIST Eds. pp. 644-652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. (1996). Stemming algorithms: A case study for detailed evaluation, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47 (1), 70-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ittycheriah, A., Franz, M., Zhu, W-J. & Ratnaparkhi A. (2000), IBM’s statistical Question Answering System. Pre-proceedings of TREC9, Gaithersburg, MD, NIST Eds, pp. 60-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ittycheriah, A., Franz, M. & Roukos, S. (2001). IBM’s Statistical Question Answering System - TREC-10. Proceedings of the Text retrieval conference, TREC 10, Gaithersburg, MD. NIST Eds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemin, C. (1999). Syntagmatic and paradigmatic representations of term variation. Proceedings of ACL’99, pp. 341-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemin, C. (2001). Spotting and Discovering Terms through NLP. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justeson, J. & Katz, S. (1995). Technical terminology: some linguistic properties and an algorithm for identification in text. Natural Language Engineering , 1, 9-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehnert, W. (1977). Human and computational question answering. Cognitive Science 1, 47-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, D. & Pantel, P. (2001). Discovery of Inference Rules for Question-Answering. Natural Language Engineering 7 (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, K. (1985). Discourse strategies for generating natural-language text, Artificial Intelligence, 27, 1-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRoy, S.W., Channarukul, S., & Ali, S.S. (2000). YAG: A Template-Based Generator for Real-Time Systems (System demonstration), Proceedings of the First International Natural Language Generation Conference (INLG), Mitze Ramon, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poibeau, T. (2002). Extraction d’information à base de connaissances hybrides. Thèse de l’université Paris-Nord.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prager J., Brown, E., Radev, D. & Czuba, K. (2000), One Search Engine or two for Question-Answering, Proceedings of the Text retrieval conference, TREC9, Gaithersburg, MD. NIST Eds, pp. 250-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riloff, E. (1996). Automatically Generating Extraction Patterns from Untagged Text, Proceedings of the 13 th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-96), pp. 1044-1049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, J. (1994). Revision-based generation of natural language summaries providing historical background: corpus-based analysis, design, implementation and evaluation. Ph.D. Thesis. CUCS-034-94, Columbia University, Computer Science Department, New York, USA. 357p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sager, N. (1981). Natural Language Information Processing, Addison-Wesley, Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, H. (1999). Improvements in Part-of-Speech Tagging with an Application To German. In Armstrong, S., Chuch, K.W., Isabelle, P., Tzoukermann, E. & Yarowski, D. (Eds.), Natural Language Processing Using Very Large Corpora, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, C. (1988). The TINA Project: text content analysis at the Corporate Research Laboratories at Siemens. Proceedings of Intelligent Multimedia Information Retrieval Systems and Management (RIAO’88), Cambridge, MA, pp. 361-368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwenk, H. & Gauvain, J.-L. (2000). Improved ROVER using Language Model Information. Proceedings of ISCA ITRW Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition: Challenges for the new Millenium, pp. 47-52, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleator, D.D. & Temperley, D. (1991). Parsing English with a Link Grammar. Technical report CMU-CS-91-196, Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soubbotin, M.M. & Soubbotin, S.M. (2001). Patterns of Potential Answer Expressions as Clues to the Right Answers. Proceedings of the Text retrieval conference, TREC 10, Gaithersburg, MD. NIST Eds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spark Jones, K. & Tait, J. (1984). Automatic search term variant generation. Journal of documentation, 40 (1), 50-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spark Jones, K. (1999). The role of NLP in text retrieval. In T. Strzalkowski (Ed.) Natural Language Information Retrieval (pp. 1-24). Boston, MA, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrli, E. (1992). The IPS system. In C. Boitet (Ed.) Coling-92, GETA, pp. 870-874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yangarber, R. & Grishman, R. (2000). Extraction Pattern Discovery through Corpus Analysis. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2000), Workshop: Information Extraction meets Corpus Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zock, M. & Sabah, G. (2002). La génération automatique de textes. In M. Fayol (Ed.) La production du langage, Coll. Sciences du Langage, Hermes.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grau, B. et al. (2008). Coping With Alternate Formulations Of Questions And Answers. In: Strzalkowski, T., Harabagiu, S.M. (eds) Advances in Open Domain Question Answering. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4746-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics