Skip to main content

Attitudes Towards Ethnic Minorities and Support for Ethnic Discrimination, a Test of Complementary Models

  • Chapter
The Explanatory Power of Models

Part of the book series: Methodos Series ((METH,volume 1))

  • 606 Accesses

Abstract

Longitudinal research discovered that the attitudes of the American majority population towards ethnic minorities had changed over the past decades: many American majority people subscribe to the general principles of ethnic equality but they do not subscribe to the implementation of these principles (Schumann, Steeh & Bobo, 1985). These contradictory trends might be explained by the gradual disappearance of overt unfavourable attitudes and gradual appearance of covert forms. In the Netherlands, most contributions regarding unfavourable attitudes towards ethnic minorities have concentrated on the more overt forms. Contrary to the United States, support for these overt attitudes has not declined (Scheepers, Felling & Peters, 1989, 1990; Scheepers, Eisinga & Linssen, 1994). Longitudinal research has shown that support for ethnic discrimination has grown since the mid-eighties (Scheepers, 1996; Scheepers et al., 1997; Coenders and Scheepers, 1998). This support turned out to be much more widely dispersed than overt unfavourable attitudes. Therefore, support for ethnic discrimination cannot be explained completely in terms of overt unfavourable attitudes towards ethnic minorities, previously shown to be present among the lower social strata. We propose to consider and test whether support for ethnic discrimination may also be explained by covert unfavourable attitudes presumably present among the intermediate social strata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J., & Sanford, R.N. (1950/1982). The authoritarian personality. New York: Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1991). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., (1993). Attitüde theory and the attitude-behavior relation. In D. Krebs & P. Schmidt (Eds.), New directions in attitude measurement. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M. (1981). The new racism. London: Junction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billiet, J., Eisinga, R., & Scheepers, P. (1996). Ethnocentrism in the low countries. New Community, European Journalon Migration and Ethnic Relations, 22(3), 401–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H.M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority group relations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobo, L., Kluegel, R., & Smith, A. (1997). Laissez Faire Racism, the crystallization of a kinder, gentler anti-black ideology. In S. Tuch & J. Martin (Eds.), Racial Attidues in the 1990′s: continuity and change. Westpoint: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S. (1984). Herefor good. Western Europe’s new ethnic minorities. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenders, M., & Scheepers, P. (1998). Support for ethnic discrimination in the Netherlands 1979–1993, effects of period, cohort and individual characteristics. European Sociological Review, 14(4),405–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenders, M., Scheepers, P., Sniderman, P., & Verberk, G. (2001). Blatant and Subtle Prejudice: dimensions, determinants and consequences, some comments on Pettigrew and Meertens. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L.A. (1956). Thefunctions of social conflict. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.A. (1985). The logic ofcausal order. Beverely Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. (1993). The subtlety of racism. Training & Development, 47(4), 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckes, T., & Six, B. (1994). Fakten und Fiktionen in der Einstellungs-Verhaltens Forschung: eine meta-analyse. Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychology, 253–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisinga, R.N., & Scheepers, P.L.H. (1989). Etnocentrisme in Nederland: Theoretische en empirische modeilen. Nijmegen: Instituut voor Toegepaste Sociale Wetenschappen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisinga, R., Felling, A., Konig, R., & Scheepers, P. (1999). Religion in Dutch society 95: Documentation of a national survey on religious andsecular attitudes in 1995. Amsterdam: Steinmetz Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J., & Portocarero, J. (1983). Intergenerational dass mobility and the convergence thesis: England, France and Sweden. British Journal ofSociology, 34, 303–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1929/1983). Arbeiter und Angestellten am Vorabend des Dritten Reiches. Muenchen: Deutschen Tashenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S.L. & Dovidio, J.F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J.F. Dovidio & S.L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (pp. 61–90). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.O., & Mueller, C.W. (1984). Factor analysis, Statistical methods andpractical issues. Beverly Hills (etc.): Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, D.R., & Sears, D.O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 414–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R.A., & Campbell, D.T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes and group behaviour. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S.M. (1983). Political man. Londen: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConahay, J.B., & Hough, J.C. (1976). Symbolic racism. Journal of Social Issues, 32(2), 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConahay J.B., Hardee, B.B., & Batts, V. (1981). Has racism declined in America ? It depends on who is asking and what is asked. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25, 563–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meertens, R.W., & Pettigrew, T.F. (1997). Is subtle prejudice really prejudice? Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 54–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middendorp, C.P. (1978). Progressiveness and Conservatism. Den Haag: Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olzak, S. (1989). Labor unrest, immigration, and ethnic conflict in urban America, 1880–1914. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1303–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T.F., & Meertens, R.W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, B., & Six, B. (1978). Sozialpsychologie des Vorurteils. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheepers, P., Felling, A., & Peters, J. (1989). Ethnocentrism in the Netherlands: A typological analysis. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 12, 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheepers, P., Felling, A., & Peters, J. (1990). Social conditions, authoritarianism and ethnocentrism: A theoretical model of the early Frankfurt school updated and tested. European Sociological Review, 6, 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheepers, P., Felling, A., & Peters, J. (1992). Anomie, authoritarianism and ethnocentrism; update of a classic theme and an empirical test. Politics and the Individual, 2(1), 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheepers, P., Eisinga, R., & Linssen, E. (1994). Etnocentrisme in Nederland. Verandering bij kansarmeen/ofgepriviligeerdegroepen? Sociologische Gids, 41, 185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheepers, P.L.H. (1996). Sociaal-politieke reacties, etnocentrische en extreem-rechtse reacties. In H. Ganzeboom (Ed.), Sociale segmentatie in 2015 (pp. 247–302). Den Haag: Wetenschappelijke Raad voor Regeringsbeleid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheepers, P., & Coenders, M. (1996). Trends in etnische discriminatie in Nederland 1980–1993. Justitiele Verkenningen, 22(3), 8–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheepers, P., Schmeets, H., & Felling, A. (1997). Fortress Holland: support for ethnocentric policies amongthe 1994-electorate of the Netherlands. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 20(1), 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. (1992). Vorurteile und Diskriminierendes Verhalten: Eine Meta-analyse. Gruppendynamik, 25,389–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, H., Steeh, C, & Bobo, L. (1985). Racial attitudes in America, trends and interpretations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, G., & Steinberg, S. (1969). The tenacity of prejudice. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, W.G. (1906/1959). Folkways. Boston: Ginn, 1906;

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, W.G. (1906/1959). Folkways. New York: Dover Publications, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology in intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterrey: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D..M.., & Moghaddam, F.M. (1987). Theories of intergroup relations, international social psychological perspectives. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verberk, G. (1999). Attitudes towards ethnic minorities: conceptualizations, measurements, and models. Nijmegen: Ph.D. dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, F. (1985). The variable effects of education on liberal attitudes: a comparative-historical analysis of anti-semitism using public opinion survey data. American Sociological Review, 50, 458–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wester, F. (1991). Strategieen voor kwal itatief onderzoek. Muiderberg: Coutinho.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scheepers, P., Verberk, G., Felling, A. (2002). Attitudes Towards Ethnic Minorities and Support for Ethnic Discrimination, a Test of Complementary Models. In: Franck, R. (eds) The Explanatory Power of Models. Methodos Series, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4676-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4676-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6122-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4676-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics