Definitions of the term ideology may be grouped in two main classes, those that imply a negative evaluation, such as “there is something rotten about any and every ideology,” and those that are roughly neutral. The first class, which treats ideology as a dyslogism, may be further divided into two subclasses: definitions that stress illusion, preconception, fanaticism, mistakes, or narrowness, but not insincerity, and those that do refer to insincerity, bad faith, rationalizations in a Freudian sense, distortion, concealed interests, or naked power orientations. Most of the couple of hundred definitions provided in a previous work (Naess et al. 1956) conform to such a classification into neutral or negative definitions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2005). Ideology and Rationality. In: Drengson, A. (eds) The Selected Works of Arne Naess. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_68
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_68
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3727-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4519-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)