Skip to main content

Digital Literacy: What it Means for Arts Education

  • Chapter
International Handbook of Research in Arts Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbook of Research in Arts Education ((SIHE,volume 16))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, C. (2002). Writing the visual: The use of graphic symbols in onscreen texts. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic era (pp. 31–46). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvermann, D. E. (Ed.). (2002). Adolescents and literacies in a digital world. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, R. (Ed.). (2004). The impact of ICT on literacy education. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1987). The new technology: Part of the solution or part of the problem. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S., & Nixon, H. (2005). Locating the subject: Teens online @ ninemsn. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 26 (3), 387–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63 (1), 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1979). From work to text (J. Harari, Trans.). In J. Harari (Ed.), Textual strategies (pp. 73–81) [Fr 1971]. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1993). The death of the author (S. Heath, Trans.). In P. Rice & P. Waugh (Eds.), Modern literary theory: A reader (2nd ed.). (pp. 114–21) [Fr 1968]. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beavis, C. (2004). “Good game”: Text and community in multiplayer computer games. In I. Snyder & C. Beavis (Eds.), Doing literacy online: Teaching, learning and playing in an electronic world (pp. 187–205). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beavis, C., Nixon, H., & Atkinson, S. (2005). LAN cafes: Cafes, places of gathering or sites of informal teaching and learning? Education, Communication & Information, 5 (1), 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berners-Lee, T., & Fischetti, M. (2000). Weaving the web. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkerts, S. (1994). The Gutenberg elegies: The fate of reading in an electronic age. Boston, MA: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C. A. (1988). The cultural dimensions of educational computing: Understanding the non-neutrality of technology. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, B. C., & Hogan, M. P. (1998). The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. In D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 269–281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D., & McFarlane, A. E. (2001). A digitally driven curriculum? London: Institute for Public Policy Research. Available online: http://www.ippr.org.uk/ (Accessed 5 March 2006).

  • Burbules, N. C. (1997). Rhetorics of the web: Hyperreading and critical literacy. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 102–122). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, N. C. (2002). The Web as a rhetorical place. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age (pp. 75–84). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. Jr. (2000). Watch IT: The risky promises and promising risks of new information technologies in education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burn, A. (2000). Repackaging the slasher movie: Digital unwriting of film in the classroom. English in Australia, 127–8, 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catano, J. (1985). Computer-based writing: Navigating the fluid text. College Composition and Communication, 36, 309–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., Paris, C. L., & Kahn, J. L. (1991). Learning to write differently: Beginning writers and word processing. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, G. (1995). What are we doing today? High school basic writers collaborating in a computer lab. Computers and Composition, 12 (1), 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranny-Francis, A. (2004) Spinning the Web: An analysis of a Web site. In I. Snyder & C. Beavis (Eds.), Doing literacy online: Teaching, learning and playing in an electronic world (pp. 145–162). New Jersey: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D. K. (1986). Cooperation, collaboration and computers: Integrating a computer into a second grade writing program. Research in the Teaching of English, 20 (4), 357–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. Y. (1992). What hypertexts can do the print narratives cannot. Reader, 28, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. Y. (1993). Social impacts of computing: The framing of hypertext – revolutionary for whom? Social Sciences Computer Review, 2 (4), 417–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durrant, C., & Green, B. (2000). Literacy and the new technologies in school education: Meeting the L(IT)eracy challenge? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23 (2), 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, M. J. (1990). Computer conferencing: Composing a feminist community of writers. In C. Handa (Ed.), Computers and community: Teaching composition in the twenty-first century (pp. 106–117). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton Cook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J. D. (1978). Experiments on composing letters: Some facts, some myths and some observations. In L. Gregg & I. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 97–127). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurak, L., Antonijevic, S., Johnson, L., Ratliff, C., & Reyman, J. (Eds.). (2004). Into the blogosphere: Rhetoric, community, and culture of weblogs. University of Minnesota. Available online: http://www.blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/ (Accessed April 2005).

  • Hammett, R. F. (2004). Words and windowss: Using technology for critical literacy. In B. R. C. Barrell, R. F. Hammett, J. S. Mayher, & G. M. Pradl (Eds.), Teaching English today: Advocating change in the secondary curriculum (pp. 117–131). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havholm, P., & Stewart, L. (1990). Modeling the operation of theory. Academic Computing, 4 (6), 8–12, 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawisher, G., & Selfe, C. (Eds.). (1991). Evolving perspectives on computers and composition studies: Questions for the 1990s. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. K. (2002). Writing machines. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (Eds.). (2002). School’s out: Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Eilola, J. (1992). Structure and text: Writing space and storyspace. Computers and Composition, 9 (2), 95–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Eilola, J. (1997). Nostalgic angels: Rearticulating hypertext writing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, M. (1991). Afternoon, a story, Computer disk. Cambridge, MA: Eastgate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, N., & Moulthrop, S. (1991). Something to imagine: Literature, composition, and interactive fiction. Computers and Composition, 9 (1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Bourne, J., Franks, A., Hardcastle, J., & Jones, K. (2005). English in urban classrooms: A multimodal perspective in teaching and learning. London, New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landow, G. P. (1992, 1997, 2005). Hypertext, Hypertext 2.0, Hypertext 3.0: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanham, R. A. (1989). The electronic word: Literary study and the digital revolution. New Literary History, 20, 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanham, R. A. (1993). The electronic word: Democracy, technology and the arts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., Bigum, C., Durrant, C. with Green, B., Honan, E., Morgan, W. et al. (1997). Digital rhetorics: literacies and technologies in education – current practices and future directions. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham, UK; Philadelphia, USA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., & Snyder, I. with Green, B. (2000). Teachers and technoliteracy: Managing literacy, technology and learning in schools. St Leonards, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (2004). This is your father’s paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10 (1), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (1998). Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media. In D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 283–301). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. A. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.). (pp. 1568–1611). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2005). UK children go online: Final report of key project findings. London: London School of Economics and Political Science. Available online: http://www.children-go-online.net/ (Accessed 2 June 2005).

  • Luke, A. (2002). What happens to literacies old and new when they’re turned into policy. In D. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 186–203). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan Culp, K., Honey, M., & Mandinach, E. (2003). A retrospective on twenty years of education technology policy. Education Development Center, Center for Children and Technology, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. Washington, DC: U.S. Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, G. (2001). Teenagers in cyberspace: Language use and language change in Internet chatrooms. Journal of Research in Reading, 24, 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, C. (1990). The computer writing room: Authority and control. Computers and Composition, 7 (2), 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulthrop, S. (1999). Computing, humanism, and the coming age of print. Is Humanities computing an academic discipline? University of Virginia. Available online: http://www.iat.ubalt.edu/moulthrop/essays/uva99/ (Accessed 2 June 2005).

  • Moulthrop, S., & Kaplan, N. (1994). They became what they beheld: The futility of resistance in the space of electronic writing. In C. L. Selfe & S. Hilligoss (Eds.), Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology (pp. 220–237). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J., Hammett, R. F., & McKillop, A. M. (1998). Opportunities for critical literacy pedagogy in student-authored hypermedia. In D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 63–78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilsen, L. (1998). Coding the light: Rethinking generational authority in a rural high school telecommunications project. In D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 129–143). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • NESTA (National Endowment for Science Technology & the Arts) (2005). NESTA Futurelab Research findings – literature reviews. Available online: http://www.nestafuturelab.org/research/lit_reviews.htm (Accessed 23 October).

  • New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hear, S., & Sefton-Green, J. (2004). Style, genre and technology: The strange case of youth culture online. In I. Snyder & C. Beavis (Eds.), Doing literacy online: Teaching, learning and playing in an electronic world (pp. 121–143). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, D. B., & Prater, D. (1993). The role of hypermedia in synthesis writing. Computers and Composition, 10 (2), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, G. (2001). If in a literary hypertext a traveler … Preparing for travel. In C. Durrant & C. Beavis (Eds.), P(ICT)ures of English: Teachers, learners and technology (pp. 227–246). Norwood, South Australia: AATE/Wakefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st century skills (2003). Learning for the 21st century. Available online: http://www.21stcenturyskills.org (Accessed 2 June 2005).

  • Postman, N. (1993). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, K. (2002). Looking across space and time: Reconceptualising literacy learning in and out of school. Research in the Teaching of English, 36 (3), 356–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (1996). Hypertext: The electronic labyrinth. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press and New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (2000). Literacy and technology studies: Past, present, future. Australian Educational Researcher, 27 (2), 97–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (2003). Keywords: A vocabulary of pedagogy and new media. In E. Bearne, H. Dombey, & T. Grainger (Eds.), Classroom interactions in literacy (pp. 7–20). Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuman, M. C. (1992). First thoughts. In M. C. Tuman (Ed.), Literacy online (pp. 3–15). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulmer, G. L. (1992). Grammatology (in the stacks) of hypermedia. In M. C. Tuman (Ed.), Literacy online (pp. 139–158). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, M. (2004). Behind the screen: The language of Web design. In I. Snyder & C. Beavis (Eds.), Doing literacy online: Teaching, learning and playing in an electronic world (pp. 91–119). NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Snyder, I., Bulfin, S. (2007). Digital Literacy: What it Means for Arts Education. In: Bresler, L. (eds) International Handbook of Research in Arts Education. Springer International Handbook of Research in Arts Education, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3052-9_89

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics