Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Harmonizing Assessment and Music in the Classroom

  • Chapter
International Handbook of Research in Arts Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbook of Research in Arts Education ((SIHE,volume 16))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Airasian, P. W. (1997). Classroom assessment (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Airasian, P. W., & Walsh, M. (1997). Constructivist cautions. Phi Delta Kappan, 78 (6), 444–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asp, E. (1998). The relationship between large-scale and classroom assessment: Compatibility or conflict. In R. Brandt (Ed.), Assessing student learning: New rules, new realities (pp. 17–46). Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: King’s College University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86 (1), 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, D., & Poole, K. (2004). Peer assessment of tertiary music performance: Opportunities for understanding performance assessment and performing through experience and self-reflection. British Journal of Music Education, 21 (1), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresler, L. (1994). Music in a double bind: Instruction by Non-Specialists in Elementary Schools. Arts Education Policy Review, 95 (3), 30–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, T. (2000) Assessing the developing child musician. Chicago, ILL GIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byo, S. (2000). Classroom teachers’ and music specialists’ perceived ability to implement the national standards for music education. Arts Education Policy Review, 101 (5), 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, C., MacDonald, R., & Carlton, L. (2003). Assessing creativity in musical compositions: Flow as an assessment tool. British Journal of Music Education, 20 (3), 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, M. J. (2004). The experiences of teachers developing and using class portfolios in general music classes in Taiwan, Republic of China. Doctoral thesis at The Pennsylvania State University. http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/preview_all/3140000

  • Colwell, R. (2002). Assessment’s potential in music education. In R. Colwell & C. Richardson (Eds.), The new handbook on research on music teaching and learning (pp. 1128–1158). Reston, VA: MENC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R. (2004). Evaluation in the arts is sheer madness. Artspraxis No. 1. Online journal. Retrieved 25/11/2004 http://education.nyu.edu/music/artspraxis/articles/colwell_content.html

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience of human psychology. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 15–35). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992). Flow: The psychology of happiness. London: Random House Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Custodero, L. (2005). Observable indicators of flow experience: A developmental perspective on musical engagement in young children from infancy to school age. Music Education Research, 7 (2), 185–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, R. (2004) Peer assessment in musical performance: The development, trial and evaluation of a methodology for the Australian tertiary environment. British Journal of Music Education, 21 (1), 89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action. New York: Teacher’s College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, L., Scripp, L., & Winner, E. (Eds.). (1992). Arts PROPEL: A handbook for music. Cambridge, MA: Project Zero, Harvard Graduate School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science Inspectorate, Ireland. (2002). Fifty school reports: What inspectors say. Dublin, Ireland: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, B. (2001). The classroom music teacher – inspirations, aspirations and realities. The evidence from Northern Ireland. British Journal of Music Education, 18 (1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. (1999). The uses and limits of performance assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (9), 658–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. (1995) Music matters: A new philosophy of music education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • England (2005). National Curriculum in Action, 2005. Accessed September 2005, http://www.ncaction.org.uk/

  • Espeland, M. (2005). Compositional process as discourse and interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitet [The Danish University of Education].

    Google Scholar 

  • Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32 (2), 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flockton, L., & Crooks, T. (2005). National education monitoring report 32: Music assessment results 2004. Dunedin, New Zealand: Educational Assessment Research Unit, University of Otago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkestad, G. (1996). Computer based creative music making: Young people’s music in the digital age. ACTA Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gipps, C. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. Review of Research in Education, 24, 355–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R., & Silver, E. (1994). Assessment, testing, and instruction: Retrospect and prospect. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, (Vol. 20, pp. 393–421). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Schmidt, M. (2002). Perspectives on alternative assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 39 (1), 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D., Welch, G. F., Purves, R., & Marshall, N. (2003). Teacher Identities in Music Education (TIME). Final Report. Roehampton University, London: Centre for International Research in Music Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsingin Sanomat [Finland’s leading national newspaper]. Accessed September 2005, http://www.helsinginsanomat.fi/english/article/No+winner+in+disappointing+Sibelius+Conductors+Competition%0D%0A/1101980971420

  • Hepworth-Osiowy, K. (2004). Assessment in elementary music education: Perspectives and practices of teachers in Winnipeg public schools. Masters Thesis, University of Manitoba, http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/preview_page/MQ91239/4#top

  • Hickey, M. (1995). Qualitative and quantitative relationships between children’s musical thinking processes and products. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, M. (2000). The use of consensual assessment in the evaluation of children’s music compositions. In C. Woods, G. Luck, R. Brochard, F. A. Seddon & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), Proceedings from the Sixth International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition [CD-ROM], Keele, UK, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, M., & Lipscomb, S. (2006). How different is good? In I. Deliege & G. Wiggins (Eds.), Musical creativity: multidisciplinary research in theory and practice. Psychology Press: Taylor & Francis Group).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: University of Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomax, A. (1962). Song structure and social structure. Ethnology, 1, 425–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomax, A. (1976). Cantometrics: A method in musical anthropology. University of California Extension Media Center, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, G. E., & Thompson, W. (1998). Assessing music performance: Issues and influences. Research Studies in Music Education, 10, 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment Governing Board. (2005). NAEP schedule approved for 2008 Accessed August 15, 2005, http://www.nagb.org/naep/NAEP_schedule_approved_05_05.doc

  • Office for Standards in Education [Ofsted]. 2004. Ofsted Subject Reports 2002/03. Music in Primary Schools. Her Majesty’s Inspectors [HMI] UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, M. (2004). Towards a balanced assessment system for Irish schools. Keynote address to the Department of Education and Science Inspectorate, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, B. (2001). Scandinavia. In D. J. Hargreaves & A. C. North (Eds.), Musical development and learning: The international perspective (pp. 175–186). London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paynter, J. (2002). Music in the school curriculum: Why bother? British Journal of Music Education, 19 (3), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persky, H. R., Sandene, B. A., & Askew, J. M. (1998). The NAEP 1997 Arts report card: Eighth-grade findings from the national assessment of educational progress (NCES 1999–486). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, S. E. (2005). “Testing, testing …” How do students use written feedback? Active Learning in Higher Education, 6 (3), 218–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W. J. (2004). All about accountability: Why assessment illiteracy is professional suicide. Educational Leadership, 62 (1), 82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese, S. (2003). Responding to student compositions. In M. Hickey (Ed.), Why and how to teach music composition: A new horizon for music education (pp. 211–232). Reston, VA: MENC: The National Association for Music Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, B., & Hamilton, D. (2005). Formative assessment: A cybernetic viewpoint. Assessment in Education, 12 (1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (1995). What’s wrong with school music? British Journal of Music Education, 15, 255–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddock, E., & Leong, S. (2005). “I am unmusical!”: The verdict of self-judgement. International Journal of Music Education, 23 (1), 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, F. A. (2002). An interpretation of composition strategies adopted by adolescents with and without prior experience of Formal Instrumental Music Tuition [FIMT] engaging with Computer-Based Composition. In M. Espeland (Ed.), Focus areas report, Samspel – International Society for Music Education [ISME ]. Bergen, Norway: ISME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, F. A., & O’ Neill, S. (2001). An evaluation study of computer-based compositions by children with and without prior experience of Formal Instrumental Music Tuition. Psychology of Music, 29 (1), 4–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, C., & Le Métais, J. (2000). The arts, creativity and cultural education: An international perspective. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, M., & Byrne, C. (2002). Ebb and flow in assessment in music. British Journal of Music Education, 19 (2), 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skolverket: Swedish National Agency for Education (2004). National evaluation of the compulsory school in 2003. Stockholm, Sweden: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloboda, J. A., Davidson, J. W., & Howe, M. J. A. (2000). Is everyone musical? In P. Murphy (Ed.), Learners, learning and assessment (pp. 46–57). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, C. (1999). Musicking: the means of performing and listening: A lecture. Music Education Research, 1 (1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spruce, G. (2001). Music assessment and the hegemony of musical heritage. In C. Philpott & C. Plummeridge (Eds.), Issues in music teaching (pp. 118–130). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, M., Brooker, R., & Gilbert, R. (2002). Examiner perceptions of using criteria in music performance assessment. Research Studies in Music Education, 18, 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, J. (2003). Imagination in education: Strategies and models in the teaching and assessing of composition. In M. Hickey (Ed.), Why and how to teach music composition: A new horizon for music education (pp. 113–138). Reston, VA: MENC: The National Association for Music Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins, R. (1997). Student-centered classroom assessment (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, G., Whitby, K., & Sharp, C. (2004). Curriculum and progression in the arts: An international study. National Foundation for Educational Research [NFER]/Qualifications and Curriculum Authority [QCA]. Accessed August 22, 2005, http://www.inca.org.uk/pdf/INCA_arts_curriculum_progression.pdf

  • Tierney, R., & Simon, M. (2004). What’s still wrong with rubrics: Focusing on the consistency of performance criteria across scale levels. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9 (2), Retrieved June 6, 2005 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=2.

  • Torrance, H. (Ed.). (1995). Evaluating authentic assessment. Buckinghamshire, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldorf, L. A. (2005). Assessment training for teaching artists. Arts & Learning Research Journal, 21 (1), 63–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, P. R. (2003). Asking music students to reflect on their creative work: Encouraging the revision process. Music Education Research, 5 (3), 243–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, P., & Hickey, M. (1995). Rating scales and their use in assessing children’s compositions. The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, VI (4), 28–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, G. F., & Adams, P. (2003). How is music learning celebrated and developed? Southwell, Notts, UK: British Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, S. (2002). Assessing young children’s musical understanding. Music Education International, 1, 112–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Younker, B. A. (2003). The nature of feedback in a community of composing. In M. Hickey (Ed.), Why and how to teach music composition: A new horizon for music education (pp. 233–242). Reston, VA: MENC: The National Association for Music Education.

    Google Scholar 

Evaluation and Assessment in Music Education in Spain

  • Aróstegui, J. L. (2003). On the nature of knowledge: What we want and what we get with measurement in music education. International Journal of Music Education, 40, 100–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aróstegui, J. L. (2004). Uncovering contradictions in evaluation: The case of the music education programme at the University of Granada. The Quality of Higher Education, 1, 138–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espona, I. (2003). Avaluació dels aprenentatges en flauta de bec [Assessment of student learning in recorder playing]. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya. Departament d’Ensenyament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Pardo, M. E. (2003). Evaluar el desarrollo musical en Secundaria [Assessing musical development in Secondary Education]. Música y Educación, XVI (1), n. 53, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosso, M. M. (1999). El aprendizaje musical infantil y su evaluación en el nivel inicial [Children’s musical learning and its assessment in kindergarten]. Salamanca: Universidad deSalamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelló, V. (2003). Los estudios musicales en la nueva ordenación del sistema educativo: su aplicación en la comunidad valenciana [Musical studies in the new educational system and its implementation in the Valencia region]. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Autónoma University of Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto, R. (2001). La evaluación de las actividades musicales [The evaluation of musical activities]. Contextos Educativos, 4, 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto, R. (2002). Investigación evaluativa del currículum de maestro especialista en música para primaria [Evaluative research of the primary music teacher education degree]. Revista de Enseñanza Universitaria, 20, 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

Music Assessment in Taiwan: Educational Practices and Empirical Studies

  • Chang, C.-P. (2001). Er tong yin yue chuang zao si kao ce yan bian zhi yan jiu [The development of the Measure of Creative Thinking in Music for elementary school children]. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taichung Teachers College, Taichung, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-W. (2002). Guo xiao si nian ji yin yue ping liang bian zhi [A primary music test for fourth grader ]. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Pingtung Teachers College, Pingtung, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-T. (2002). Guo xiao xue tong yin yue xing xiang ce yan bian zhi yan jiu [Development of music aptitude tests for primary school students]. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taichung Teachers College, Taichung, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S.-Y. (2003). Guo xiao si dao liu nian ji jie zou ting yin neng li ji xiang guan yin shu zhi yan jiu [A study of the relationship between the rhythm perception of fourth to sixth grades Taiwanese children and their home environment and music experience]. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, M.-J. (2005). Yun yong jiao xue dang an jia qiang hua yin yue jiao shi xing shi zhi ge an yan jiu [The use of a teaching portfolio in enhancing a music teacher’s reflective thinking: A case study]. Research in Arts Education, 9, 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y.-C. (2004). Guo zhong yin yue yue li cheng jiu ce yan zhi fa zhan [The development of a music achievement test for junior high school students]. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, Y.-M. (2001). Guo xiao si nian ji yin yue xue xi dang an ping liang gong ju zhi fa zhan yan jiu [Investigation of the development of fourth-grade music learning portfolio assessment measures I]. (NSC 89–2411-H-024–008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, Y.-M. (2002). Guo xiao si nian ji yin yue xue xi dang an ping liang gong ju zhi fa zhan yan jiu [Investigation of the development of fourth-grade music learning portfolio assessment measures II]. (NSC 90–2411-H-024–002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, I.-C. (2004). Guo xiao wu nian ji xue sheng ting bian er sheng bu qu diao neng li zhi yan jiu [Two-part music identification abilities of fifth grade students]. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, M.-L. (2005). Assessment approaches used by Taiwanese music teachers in junior high schools. In C. H. Chen & K. C. Liang (Eds.), Proceedings of 2005 International Symposium on Empirical Aesthetics: Culture, Arts and Education (pp. 151–158). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.-Y. (2003). Guo xiao si nian ji er tong qu diao ting yin neng li zhi diao cha yan jiu [The survey study on melodic-aural ability of fourth-grade children in the elementary school]. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S.-Y. (2005). Yin yue chuang zao li zhi shi zheng: Yi Mai Xiang Yi Shu ke cheng fang an yun yong yu guo xiao yin yue chuang zuo jiao xue [An empirical study of music creativity: The implementation of arts PROPEL program in elementary school music composition instruction]. (NSC 93–2411-H-133–002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (1993). Guo min xiao xue ke cheng biao zhun [Elementary school curriculum standards]. Taipei: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (1994). Guo min zhong xue ke cheng biao zhun [Junior high school curriculum standards]. Taipei: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2003). Guo min zhong xiao xue jiu nian yi guan ke cheng gang yao yi shu yu ren wen xue xi ling yu [Grade 1–9 curriculum guidelines arts and humanities learning area]. Taipei: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiu, J.-L. (2004). Zhong bu di qu guo min xiao xue xue sheng diao shi xuan luu bian ren zhi yan jiu [An investigation of mode melody recognition of elementary students in central Taiwan]. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

Program Assessment in Turkish Music Education

  • Bilen, I. (1983). The course “methods for music teaching” given in music teacher education institutions, and evaluation of this course in the scope of program development. Unpublished Master thesis, Ankara University Faculty of Education Sciences, Ankara (in Turkish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertürk, S. (1993). Program development in education (7th ed.). Ankara: Meteksan A. S. (in Turkish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazi Institute of Education, music department (1979). Graduate and undergraduate education programs in music education (in Turkish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir, S. (1983). Comparison of a course based on singing with a course enhanced with instrument based on singing. Gazi University Faculty of Education Department of Music Education, Ankara (in Turkish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Süer, R. (1972). Teaching in music teacher education institutions. Uunpublished doctorate thesis. Ankara University Faculty of Education, Ankara (in Turkish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uçan, A. (1982). 1st year program assessment of Gazi School of Education Music department. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Doktora Tezi, Ankara (in Turkish).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dublin City University, Ireland

    Regina Murphy

Authors
  1. Regina Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, U.S.A.

    Liora Bresler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murphy, R. (2007). Harmonizing Assessment and Music in the Classroom. In: Bresler, L. (eds) International Handbook of Research in Arts Education. Springer International Handbook of Research in Arts Education, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3052-9_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation