Skip to main content

Particles and prefixes in Dutch and English

  • Chapter
Yearbook of Morphology 2003

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Morphology ((YOMO))

Abstract

This paper charts the historical development of two sets of verbal prefixes in the West-Germanic languages, which appear to show a large degree of functional equivalence, although they have rather different morphosyntactic properties. The first set is inseparable, as found in the Dutch verbs verbranden ‘burn’, beschrijven ‘describe’, ontmoeten ‘meet’; while the second set is separable, as found in the Dutch verbs opbellen ‘call up’, afzeggen ‘call off’, wegblazen ‘blow away’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aarts, B. (1989). Verb-preposition constructions and small clauses in English. Journal of Linguistics 25, 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aarts, F. and J. Aarts (1982). English Syntactic Structures. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, F. (1987). Miscreant Morphemes: Phrasal Predicates in Ugric. Diss. Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Admoni, V.G. (1966). Stroj Sovremennogo Nemckogo Jazyka/Der deutsche Sprachbau. 2nd edition. Moscow/Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, E.M. Jr. (1953). Test Frames for Structures with UP in modern American English. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, H. van den (2002). Spatial prefixes in Akusha Dargi (East Caucasian). Paper delivered at the 10th International Morphology Conference, Szentendre, Hungary, 9–12 May 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D. (1971). The Phrasal Verb in English. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boogaart (1999). Aspect and Temporal Ordering: A Contrastive Analysis of Dutch and English (LOT Dissertations 27). The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, G.E. (1990). The boundary between morphology and syntax: Separable complex verbs in Dutch. In: G. E. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1990. Dordrecht: Foris, 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, G.E. (1992). Morphology, Semantics and Argument Structure. In: I.M Roca (ed.), Thematic structure: Its role in grammar. Berlin/New York: Foris, 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, G.E. (1998). Samenkoppelingen en grammaticalisatie. Morfologiedagen 1996, edited by E. Hoekstra and C. Smits. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut, 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, G.E. (2002). The Morphology of Dutch. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, G.E. and T. van Haaften (1988). The external syntax of derived words, evidence from Dutch. In: G E. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1988, 29–44. Booij, G.E. and A. van Kemenade (this volume). Introduction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinton, L.J. (1988). The Development of English Aspectual Systems: Aspectualizers and post-verbal Particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelle, B. (2002). And up it rises: Particle preposing in English. In: Dehé et al., 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claridge, C. (2000). Multi-word Verbs in early Modern English: A Corpus-based Study. (Language and Computers 32). Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehé, N., R. Jackendoff, A. McIntyre and S. Urban (2002). Verb-particle Explorations (Interface Explorations 1), Introduction. Barlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbrück, B. (1910). Zur Stellung des Verbums im Gotischen und Altisländischen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 36, 359–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbrück, B. (1911). Germanische Syntax II: Zur Stellung des Verbums. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, philologisch-historische Klasse, 28.7. Lzipzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. (1981). Aspects of the History of English Group-verbs, with particular Attention to the Syntax of the Ormulum, diss. Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. (1985). The origins of completive up in English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 86, 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikken, M. den (1995). Particles: On the Syntax of Verb-particle, Triadic, and Causative Constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikken, M. den (2002). Review of Zeller, J. (2001). Particle Verbs and local Domains. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today), Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4, 145–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eythórsson, Th. (1995). Verbal syntax in the early Germanic Languages. Diss. Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N.L. (1965). Studies in the Collocation of lexical Items with Prepositions and Adverbs in a Corpus of spoken and written Present-day English. MA thesis, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraresi, G. (1997). Word Order and Phrase Structure in Gothic. Dissertation Stuttgart University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, O., A. van Kemenade, W. Koopman, and W. van der Wurff (eds.) (2000). The Syntax of early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. (1965). An Examination of the Verb-particle Construction in English. Dissertation MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. (1976). The verb-particle combination in English. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewendorf, G. (1990). Verbbewegung und Negation im Deutschen. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 30, Groningen: Germanistisch Instituut, University of Groningen, 57–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A.C. (this volume) Preverbs and their origins in Georgian and Udi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, A.D. and R.L. Venezky (1985[1980]). A Microfiche Concordance to Old English. Toronto: The Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltunen, R. (1983). The Decline of the Prefixes and the Beginnings of the English Phrasal Verb: The Evidence from some Old and Middle English Texts (Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, Series B, 160). Turun Yliopisto (University of Turku, Finland), Turku.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, T., M. Lansu and M. Westerduin (1987). Complexe verba. GLOT 10, 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, P. (1975). The syntax of the simple sentence in Proto-Germanic. ai]The Hague etc.: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundschnurscher, F. (1968). Das System der Partikelverben mit AUS in der Gegenwartsprache. Dissertation Universität Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1997). Twistin’ the night away. Language 73, 534–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemenade, A. van (1987). Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemenade, A. van (1997). V2 and embedded topicalisation in Old and Middle English. In A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: CUP, 326–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemenade, A. van (2000). Jespersen’s cycle revisited: Formal properties of grammaticalization. In: S. Pintzuk, G. Tsoulas, and A. Warner (eds.), Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, F. (1901). Vorgeschichte der altgermanischen Dialekte. In: Paul, H. Grundriss der germanischen Philologie, Band 1. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner, 320–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, W. (1985). The syntax of verb and particle combinations in Old English. In: H. Bennis and F. Beukema(eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1985. Dordrecht: Foris, 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, H. (1995). De plaats van geincorporeerde hoofden in de werkwoordscluster. Tabu 25, 174–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroch, A. and A. Taylor (2000). Verb-object order in early Middle English. In: S. Pintzuk, G. Tsoulas and A. Warner(eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and Mechanisms. Oxford: OUP, 132–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kytö, M. (ed.) (1993). Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding Conventions and lists of Source Texts. 2nd edition. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, English Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legum, St. E. (1968). The verb-particle constructions in English: basic or derived? In: B.J. Darden, Ch.-J.N. Bailey and A. Davidson (eds.), Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 50–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, W. (1906). Das Präfix uz-besonders im Altenglischen. (Kieler Studien zur englischen Philologie. N.F. 3). Kiel: Cordes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, W.P. (1986). A Gothic Etymological Dictionary. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, M. (1977 [1907]). Die Vorsilbe ver-und ihre Geschichte. Germanistische Abhandlungen 27. Reprint Hildesheim: Olms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, R. and Baayen (1993). Verbal prefixes in Dutch: A study in lexical conceptual structure. In:.G.E. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1993. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 51–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipka, L. (1972). Semantic Structure and Word Formation: Verb-particle Constructions in Contemporary English. M:unchen: Wilhelm Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüdeling, A. (1999). On particle verbs and similar constructions in German (Sprachtheoretische Grundlagen für die Computerlinguistik: Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340). Diss. Universität Tübingen. (Published by CSLI, Stanford, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, A. (2000). German Double Particles as Preverbs: Morphology and Conceptual Semantics. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, A. (2001). Argument blockages induced by verb particles in English and German: Event modification and secondary predication. In: N. Dehé and A. Wanner (eds.), Structural Aspects of Semantically Complex Verbs. Berlin: Peter Lang, 131-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meillet, A. (1908). Notes sur quelques faits gotiques. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 15, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metlen, M. (1933). What a Greek interlinear of the Gothic Bible text can teach us. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 32, 530–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeleman, A. and F. Weerman (1993). Case theory and the diachrony of complex predicates in Dutch. Folia Linguistica Historica 13, 189–217. The Oxford English Dictionary on CD-ROM (1989). 2nd edition. Ed. by J.A. Simpson and E.S.C. Weiner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintzuk, S. (1991). Phrase structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order. Dissertation University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintzuk, S. (1996). Old English verb-complement word order and the change from OV to VO. York Papers in Linguistics 17, 241–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, R. and S. Greenbaum(1973). A University Grammar of English. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport Hovav, M. and B. Levin (2001). An event structure account of English resultatives. Language 77, 766–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, J.H. (1999). Verb Adverb and Verb Particle Constructions: Their Syntax and Acquisition. (Boston University PhD Dissertation). Michigan: UMI Dissertation Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. (1883) Die Germanischen Praepositionen und das Auslautgesetz. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 26, 20–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze-Berndt, E. (this volume) Preverbs as an open class in Northern Australian languages: Synchronic and diachronic considerations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, A. and M. Zaretskaya (1998). Verb prefixation in Russian as lexical subordination. Linguistics 36, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow, A. (1993). Die Aufgaben der Syntax. In: J. Jacobs, W. Sternefeld, A. von Stechow, and Th. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiebels, B. (1996). Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte: Zum semantischen Beitrag von verbalen Präfixen und Partikeln. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streitberg, W. (1920). Gotisches Elementarbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streitberg, W (1965). Der gotische Bibel. Vol. I and II. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toivonen, I. (2001). The Phrase Structure of Non-Projecting Words. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinka, M. (1999). On Swedish verb-particle constructions, ms. McGill University, Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, F. Th. (1963-73). An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Vols. 1-3b. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, C. (1964). Preliminaries to the reconstruction of Indo-European sentence structure. In: H.G. Lunt (ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Linguists. The Hague: Mouton, 1035–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerman, F. (1989). The V2 Conspiracy: A Synchronic and a Diachronic Analysis of verbal Positions in Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, E.M.H. (1986). Footprints of yesterday’s syntax: Diachronic developments of certain verb prefixes in an OSV language. Lingua 68, 291–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, S. (1997). Focus and Secondary Predication. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, J. (2001). Particle Verbs and Local Domains. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 56), Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, J. (this volume) Moved preverbs in German: displaced or misplaced?

    Google Scholar 

Text Editions

  • d’Ardenne, S.T.R.O. (1977). The Katherine Group, edited from MS. Bodley 34. Paris: Sociéte d’Edition’ Les Belles Lettres’.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Clark (1970). The Peterborough Chronicle 1070-1154. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holthausen, F. (1967[1921]). Vices and Virtues: A soul’s confessions of its sins with reason’s description of the virtues, 2 vols. (EETS, original series 89, 159). London etc.: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Kemenade, A., Los, B. (2003). Particles and prefixes in Dutch and English. In: Booij, G., Van Marle, J. (eds) Yearbook of Morphology 2003. Yearbook of Morphology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1513-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1513-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1272-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-1513-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics