Skip to main content

The Radicalisation of Science

  • Chapter
The Radicalisation of Science

Part of the book series: Critical Social Studies

Abstract

Since the end of the 1960s there has been a clear shift in consciousness of many scientists — especially science students — of the role of science and technology in contemporary capitalism. This movement has been concentrated in the United States and Britain, the two most scientifically advanced Western countries, judged by such formal criteria as percentage of GNP spent on science, or numbers of papers published or Nobel Prizes per head of the population.

This chapter was originally written for the 1972 issue of the Socialist Register and subsequently reprinted in Science for the People. It represented the gathering together of our experiences within the scientists’ movement at that time. We reprint it here — even though our understanding of certain of the issues has sharpened during the intervening period — because it served both to fuel the necessary debate within the movement concerning its direction and theoretical needs, and also as a programmatic guide for the present book. Gary Werskey’s critical appraisal in Radical Science Journal, 2/3 (1975) must be mentioned in this regard. We have taken out or compressed some material which is covered elsewhere within the book or now seems merely past history, added some footnotes and a postscript.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See, for example, M. Brown (ed.), The Social Responsibility of the Scientist (New York: Free Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Rose and H. Rose, in The Social Impact of Modern Biology, ed W. Fuller (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See, for example, T. Roszak, The Making of A Counter-Culture (London: Faber & Faber, 1970); and such journals as Environment (United States) and Your Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. J. de Solla Price, Little Science, Big Science (New York: Columbia University Press, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Rose and S. Rose, Science and Society (London: Allen Lane, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Bukharin, et al., Science at the Crossroads (London: Cass, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Engels, Dialectics of Nature (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1940),

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. I. Lenin, Materialism and Empiriocriticism (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. B. S. Haldane, The Marxist Philosophy and the Natural Sciences (London: Allen & Unwin, 1937).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Needham, Science and Civilisation in China, 4 vols (Cambridge University Press, 1954–71).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. D. Bernal, The Social Function of Science (London: Rout-ledge & Kegan Paul, 1939); Science in History (London: Watts, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  12. See, for example, such diverse figures as E. B. Chain, New Scientist (October 1970);

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. H. S. Burhop, ‘Lecture to Technical University, West Berlin’ (19 November 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. R- Graham, Science and Philosophy in the Soviet Union (New York: Knopf, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Z. Medvedev, The Rise and Fall of T. D. Lysenko (Columbia University Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. J. Miiller, Out of the Night (New York: Vanguard, 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Williams, The Long Revolution (London: Chatto & Windus 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Mayer, in Chemical and Biological Warfare, ed. S. Rose (London: Harrap, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Fieser, The Scientific Method (New York: Reinhold, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Allen (ed.), March 4th Scientists, Students and Society (MIT Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Rose and R. Stetler, New Society (25 September 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Rose, The Himsworth Memorandum (London: BSSRS, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cambridge Society for Social Responsibility in Science Bulletin reprinted in The Biological Basis of Behaviour, ed. N. Chalmers, R. Crawley and S. Rose (London: Harper & Row, 1971); see also the later book edited by K. Richardson and D. Spears, Race, Culture and Intelligence (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972); and the pamphlet Racism, IQ and the Class Society issued by the Campaign on Racism, IQ and the Class Society in 1974. See also The Political Economy of Science, chapter 7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. J. Eysenck, Race, Intelligence and Education (London: Temple Smith, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  25. W. Fuller (ed.) The Social Impact of Modern Biology (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. Wick, New Scientist also Solidarity pamphlet, Soldier Technicians or Irresponsible Scientists (1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Hilary Rose Steven Rose

Copyright information

© 1976 Hilary Rose and Steven Rose

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rose, H., Rose, S. (1976). The Radicalisation of Science. In: Rose, H., Rose, S. (eds) The Radicalisation of Science. Critical Social Studies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86145-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics