Skip to main content

The Improbable Guru: Re-Reading Marcuse

  • Chapter
Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory

Part of the book series: Contemporary Social Theory

  • 94 Accesses

Abstract

‘The improbable Guru of surrealistic politics’: a phrase used in Fortune magazine in the late 1960s to describe Herbert Marcuse.1 Why improbable? Because Marcuse, already at that time 70 years old, had for many years laboured in relative obscurity, a writer less than limpid in style, whose works were known only to certain sectors of the academic community. One book above all others propelled Marcuse to a fame — or brought to him a notoriety — which stretched far beyond the bounds of the academy. First published in 1964, One-Dimensional Man coincided with the initial rise of the student movement in the USA, and became something of a manifesto for student activists associated with the New Left in many countries. Today the New Left already appears positively ancient, in a climate of opinion and political activity which has seen the rise of a New Right. Marcuse himself, of course, was far from wholly content with the ways in which his work was invoked by New Left radicals. Indeed, while lending his support to various of the radical activities of the period, Marcuse foresaw that the impact of the student movements might be limited; and he anticipated their dissolution. In 1969 he wrote that neither the students, nor the New Left more generally, could be seen as the progenitors of a new society; when their activities reached their limits, he feared, ‘the Establishment may initiate a new order of totalitarian suppression’.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cf. Paul Breines, Critical Interruptions (New York: Herder & Herder, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Herbert Marcuse, An Essay on Liberation (Boston: Beacon, 1969) p. viii.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Some of these appeared in translation much later, in Marcuse, Negations (Boston: Beacon, 1968) and in other sources. Certain early essays remain untranslated, but are readily available in the reprinted edition of the Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung (Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. For an analysis which makes this particularly clear, see David Held, Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas (London: Hutchinson, 1980). Held remarks that, ‘Of all the members of the Frankfurt School, Marcuse’s life-long relation to his early work and political ambitions is perhaps the most consistent’ (p. 73). For Marcuse’s ‘Heideggerian version’ of Marx, see ‘Contributions to a phenomenology of historical materialism’, Telos, vol. 4, 1969 (originally published in 1928).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marcuse, Reason and Revolution (New York: Oxford University Press, 1960) p. viii.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man (Boston: Beacon, 1966) pp. x–xi.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. on this point Marcuse’s essay, first published in 1941, on ‘Some social implications of modern technology’, reprinted in Andrew Arato and Eike Gebhardt (eds), The Essential Frankfurt School Reader (Oxford, Blackwell, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. One-Dimensional Man, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marcuse, Eros and Civilization (Boston: Vintage, 1961) p.x.

    Google Scholar 

  11. One-Dimensional Man, pp. 131ff.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid, p. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid, p. 231.

    Google Scholar 

  14. An Essay on Liberation, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies (London: Hutchinson, 1973) ch. 14 and passim.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See, for instance, Alasdair MacIntyre, Marcuse (London: Fontana, 1970), who bluntly announced in the opening pages of his book that ‘almost all of Marcuse’s key positions are false’ (p. 7).

    Google Scholar 

  17. One-Dimensional Man, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cf. Marcuse, Soviet Marxism (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958) p. xi and passim.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cf. ‘Classical social theory and the origins of modern sociology’, in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Paul Mattick, Critique of Marcuse (London: Merlin, 1972);

    Google Scholar 

  21. also Claus Offe, ‘Technik und Eindimensionalität. Eine Version der Technokratiethese?’, in Jürgen Habermas et al., Antworten auf Herbert Marcuse (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marcuse’s critical assessment of Weber, it should be noted, turns more than anything else upon the assertion that what Weber saw as the formal reason of bureaucracy, and as the inevitable concomitant of contemporary society, is actually capable of radical transformation. He accepts the general thrust of Weber’s analysis of ‘rationalisation’, while disputing its inescapable character. See ‘Industrialisation and capitalism in the work of Max Weber’, in Negations.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cf. my ‘Postscript’ to the second edition of The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marcuse, Counterrevolution and Revolt (Boston: Beacon, 1972) p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. ‘Postscript’, pp. 312–19. See also ‘Power, the dialectic of control and class structuration’, in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  26. One-Dimensional Man, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality, vol. 1 (London: Allen Lane, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eros and Civilization, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid, p. 208.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Marcuse, Five Lectures: Psychoanalysis, Politics and Utopia (London: Allen Lane, 1970) p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See ‘Habermas’s social and political theory’, in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Habermas, of course, has his own criticisms of Marcuse, whom Habermas none the less claims as one of the main influences upon his own work. See Antworten auf Herbert Marcuse; see also Marcuse, Habermas, et al., ‘Theory and politics’, Telos, no. 38, 1978–9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Five Lectures: Psychoanalysis, Politics and Utopia, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Quotations from Counterrevolution and Revolt, p. 60; and Five Lectures: Psychoanalysis, Politics and Utopia, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Marcuse, Habermas, et al., ‘Theory and politics’, p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  36. ‘The struggle against liberalism in the totalitarian view of the state’, in Negations, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See especially pp. 3ff in that work.

    Google Scholar 

  38. See ‘Class division, class conflict and citizenship rights’, in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1982 Anthony Giddens

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giddens, A. (1982). The Improbable Guru: Re-Reading Marcuse. In: Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory. Contemporary Social Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86056-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics