Skip to main content

A Little about Myself, and More about a More Important Matter — the Brain

  • Chapter
Women Scientists
  • 8 Accesses

Abstract

If one compares the relative numbers of men and women among college students and heads of scientific departments and institutes, one becomes immediately aware that comparatively few women achieve leading positions in the sciences. In seeking the reasons for this, much can be ascribed to tradition and, not yet everywhere legally overthrown, discrimination against women — much, but not all. There are countries, and in this respect my own country has dealt very satisfactorily with this problem, where the law fully supports and protects equal rights for men and women. Some aspects of the present situation are certainly determined by the women themselves. For quite understandable biological reasons they prefer more often than men not to choose professions that demand incessant work — and real science does not permit one ever to relax, morning, noon or night. But if we construct a pyramid with the base representing the number of men and women who have already chosen the not-so-easy scientific career, here also the proportion of women will rapidly fall off towards the peak. Female biology is not quite faultless here either, of course, but that is not the only factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bechtereva, N. P., Neyrophysiologicheskije aspecty psychicheskoy deijatelnosti, 2nd ed. (Medizina, Leningrad, 1974); The Neurophysiologies Aspects of Human Mental Activity (Oxford University Press, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bechtereva, N. P., Bundzen, P. V., and Gogolitsyn, Yu. L., Mosgovye cody psychicheskoy deijatelnosti (Cerebral Codes of Mental Activity) (Nauka, Leningrad, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bechtereva, N. P., Bundzen, P. V., Gogolitsyn, Yu. L., and Malyshev, V. N., Neurophysiological codes of words in subcortical structures of the human brain, Brain and Language, 7 (1979) 145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Walker, J., and Halas, E., Neuronal coding at subcortical auditory nuclei,Physiology Behav., 8 (1972) 1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, W., Marsh, G., and Smith, G., Evoked potential waveform differences produced by the perception of different meanings of an ambiguous phrase, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 41 (1976) 113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bundzen, P. V., Troubachev, V. V., and Kropotov, Yu. D., Fiziologiya Cheloveka (Journal of Human Physiology) Moscow, Acad. Sei. USSR, 4 (1978) 539 (Plenum, New York, a cover-to-cover translation).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Derek Richter

Copyright information

© 1982 The Contributors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bechtereva, N.P. (1982). A Little about Myself, and More about a More Important Matter — the Brain. In: Richter, D. (eds) Women Scientists. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81342-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81342-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-81344-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-81342-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics