Skip to main content

The Holocaust-Era Assets Debate and Beyond

A Swiss Perspective

  • Chapter
Remembering for the Future

Abstract

Towards the end of 1996, a heated discussion began on Switzerland’s role during the Second World War.1 Admittedly, at the beginning, the Swiss did not take this criticism seriously enough.2 Why did Switzerland underestimate the problem? It is probably fair to say that for us — as for many throughout the world — the tragedy of the Holocaust was history, was bygone. As to the financial issues, we considered that our ancestors had dealt with them after the war. Today, some of us may find comfort in the fact that other countries — some of which are much more concerned by the issue than Switzerland -have similarly underestimated the problem, in spite of the Swiss precedent.

We have heard survivors and witnesses speak. Paradoxically, they advocate hope, not despair, solidarity instead of anger. They all insisted on the importance of memory: it may well be our only answer, our human hope to save our children.

- Elie Wiesel

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. J. Rossier, ‘Switzerland, Gold and the Banks: Analysis of a Crisis’, Speech at the Harvard Faculty Club, 26 May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H.J. Bär, ‘Switzerland revisited — a case of managerial incompetence?’, Remarks on the occasion of the 1998 Global Forum on Management Education, Chicago, 13 June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Independent Committee of Eminent Persons (ICEP): ‘Report on Dormant Accounts of Victims of Nazi Persecution in Swiss Banks’, December 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Nazi Gold, The London Conference (London: Foreign & Commonwealth Office, 1998) and J.-D. Bindenagel (ed.), Washington Conference on Holocaust-Era Assets, Proceeding, (Washington, D.C.: US Department of State, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. On these questions see D. Vagts, J. Drolshammer and P.J. Murray, ‘Mit prozessieren den Holocaust bewältigen? Die Rolle des Zivilrechts und Zivilprozesses beim Versuch der Wiedergutmachung internationaler Katastrophen’ in Zeitschrift für Schweizerisches Recht (ZSR), 1999, p.511ff

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.H. Huston, The Sister Republics — Switzerland and the United States from 1776 to the Present (Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. For a recent review in English of Switzerland’s situation during the war years see S.P. Halbrook, Target Switzerland — Swiss Armed Neutrality in World War II, Rockville Centre, NY: Sarpedon, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Foxman, ‘The Dangers of Holocaust Restitution’, Wall Street Journal, 4 December 1998. For a radical critique, see N. Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry — an Essay on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering (New York: Verso, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

John K. Roth Elisabeth Maxwell Margot Levy Wendy Whitworth

Copyright information

© 2001 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Borer-Fielding, T., Mock, H. (2001). The Holocaust-Era Assets Debate and Beyond. In: Roth, J.K., Maxwell, E., Levy, M., Whitworth, W. (eds) Remembering for the Future. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-66019-3_120

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-66019-3_120

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-80486-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-66019-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics