Abstract
There are various ways in which a person’s freedom of action may be diminished or restricted. Instead of acting, he may be acted upon; or he may be unable to help doing what he does. He may suffer from some disability, have a duty imposed on him or do something because he is obliged to do it. In this essay, I wish to examine the notion of being obliged to do something. I shall investigate the differences between ‘being obliged by A to do X’ and ‘being obliged to A for X’; between ‘being obliged to do X’ and ‘having (or being under) an obligation to do X’; between being physically obliged and being morally, legally and logically obliged; and between saying ‘X is something I am obliged to do’, ‘X is something I choose to do’ and ‘X is something I ought to do’. I am indebted to my colleagues at Hull, to H. L. A. Hart of Oxford, P. J. Fitzgerald of Leeds and A. Sloman of Sussex for criticisms of an earlier draft of this paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Copyright information
© 1968 The Royal Institute of Philosophy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
White, A.R. (1968). On Being Obliged to Act. In: The Human Agent. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27908-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27908-1_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-09601-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27908-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)