Skip to main content

Landscape and Place

  • Chapter
Approaches to Landscape
  • 96 Accesses

Abstract

Within the humanities and social sciences there has been an upwelling of interest in both landscape and place. The escalation in interest has been most marked in the area of humanistic geography, which emerged during the 1970s and subsequently gathered strength: ‘Humanistic geography is in large part a response to perceived inadequacies in the traditional geographical approach to understanding the cultural landscape. That approach, with its goal of objective scientific detachment, fails to grasp the fundamental matter of what it is to exist in or experience the landscape’ (Bourassa, 1991 pp. 2–3). To some human geographers, the (re)discovery of place meant a return to relevance: ‘If geography is to survive as a rational framework for teaching and research, it must identify a new integrative core. We argue that a return to our traditional disciplinary concern with a sense of place and landscape would allow geography to move forward again, as a unified and valued discipline’ (Robinson and McCarroll, 1990 p. 1). As favour swung strongly away from positivism in the 1980s, interest in the sense of place existed as a strong strand — probably the strongest strand — of enquiry in the expanding humanistic geography. The developing approach had its critics, and disapproval was directed at the rather ‘precious’ nature of much of the discussion relating to the sense of place (Brookfield, 1989).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barrell, J. ‘Geographies of Hardy’s Wessex’ Journal of Historical Geography 8 (1982) pp. 347–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berner, E. and Korff, R. ‘Globalization and local resistance: the creation of localities in Manila and Bangkok’ International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 19 (1995) pp. 208–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon, H. and Hudson, R. ‘Place and space in contemporary Europe: some lessons and reflections’ Antipode 25 (1993) pp. 177–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. ‘The archaeology of place’ Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1 (1982) pp. 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, B. P. ‘Wessex, Hardy and the nature novelists’ Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 6 (1981) pp. 348–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blunden, J. and Turner, G. Critical Countryside (London: BBC Publications, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondi, L. ‘Gender symbols and urban landscapes’ Progress in Human Geography 16 (1992) pp. 157–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa, S. C. The Aesthetics of Landscape (London: Belhaven Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. ‘Monuments and places’ in Garwood, P., Jennings, D., Skeates, R. and Toms, J. (eds), Sacred and Profane, Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph No. 32, 1991, pp. 135–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, H. C. ‘The behavioural environment: how, what for, and whose?’ in Boal, F.W. and Livingstone, D.N. (eds), The Behavioural Environment (London: Routledge, 1989) pp. 311–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, M. The Countryside Ideal (London: Routledge, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Countryside Commission and Hunting Technical Services Monitoring Landscape Change (Cheltenham, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuba, L. and Hummon, D. ‘A place to call home: identification with dwelling, community, and region’ Sociological Quarterly 34 (1993) pp. 111–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entrikin, N.J. ‘Place and region’ Progress in Human Geography 18 (1994) pp. 227–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, C. B. The Provinces of England (London, 1919).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. ‘From space to place and back again: reflections on the condition of postmodernity’ in Bird, J., Curtis, B., Putnam, T., Robertson, G. and Tickner, L. (eds), Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change (London: Routledge, 1993) pp. 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. S. P. ‘West Edmonton Mall: Landscape of myths and else-whereness’ The Canadian Geographer 34 (1990) 2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howkins, A. ‘The discovery of rural England’ in Colls, R. and Dodd, P. (eds), Englishness: Politics and Culture 1880–1920 (London: Croom Helm, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. B. ‘The order of a landscape: reason and religion in Newtonian America’ in Meinig, D. W. (ed.) The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes (New York: Oxford University Press, 1979) pp. 153–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, L. J. ‘The Black Country of Francis Brett Young’ Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 66 (1975) pp. 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, D. H. Studies in Classic American Literature (London, 1933).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. ‘Past time, present place: landscape and memory’ Geographical Review 65 (1975) pp. 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. ‘Finding valued landscapes’ Progress in Human Geography 2 (1978) pp. 373–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. ‘The conceptualization of place’ in Massey, D. and Jess, P. A Place in the World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995) pp. 45–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, J. ‘Globalization and the politics of place: place and identity in an inner London neighbourhood’ Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 21 (1996) pp. 194–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, D. C. and Coppack, P. M. ‘The role of rural settlement and vernacular landscapes in contriving sense of place in the city’s countryside’ Geografiska Annaler 76B (1994) pp. 161–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, D. C. D. ‘Place and the novelist’ Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 6 (1981) pp. 337–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relph, E. Place and Placelessness (London: Pion, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V. and McCarroll, D. The Isle of Man: Celebrating a Sense of Place (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. ‘Geography as a science of observation: the landscape, the gaze and masculinity’ in Driver, F. and Rose, G. (eds), Nature and Science: Essays in the History of Geographical Knowledge Institute of British Geographers Research Series No. 28 (1992) pp. 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. ‘Place and identity: a sense of place’ in Massey, D. and Jess, P. A Place in the World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995) pp. 87–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sack, R. D. Conceptions of Space in Social Thought (London: Macmillan, 1980).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shoard, M. This Land is Our Land (London: Paladin, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y.-F. ‘Place: an experiential perspective’ Geographical Review 65 (1975) pp. 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y.-F. ‘Language and the making of place: a narrative-descriptive approach’ Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81 (1991) pp. 684–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. The Politics of Landscape (Oxford: Blackwell, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyner, B. E. ‘The territory of ritual: cross-ridge boundaries and the prehistoric landscape of the Cleveland Hills, Northeast England’ Antiquity 68 (1994) pp. 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley, D. J. and Lewis, G. J. People and Environment (Harlow: Longman, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, J. ‘Ambivalent attachments to place in London: twelve Barbadian families’ Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 11 (1993) pp. 147–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 Richard Muir

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Muir, R. (1999). Landscape and Place. In: Approaches to Landscape. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27243-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics