Abstract
The term ‘dogmatic’, having been deemed incompatible with modernity, has been banished; nevertheless, it is still used occasionally to describe either the religious vestiges of European textuality or certain totalitarian structures of discourse. Although it does not recognise the fecundity enjoyed by this term in the period preceding the twentieth century, and specifically its role in the emergence of a differentiated concept of law for each of a number of intertwined discourses (natural science, medicine, law, theology), the contemporary attitude does implicitly recognise that dogma harbours an obscure and compact phenomenon, which has to do with the power of speech and with the question of Reason or un-Reason in human communication.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See the study in E. Benveniste, Le Vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes, 1969, Paris: Minuit, vol. 1, at p. 96.
See Plato, Cratylus, in Collected Dialogues, 1961 edn, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 408.
The notion is ritualised in formulae such as ‘lex animata’ meaning a Law which breathes. These formulae referred to the person of the Roman emperor and later to the pope. See P. Legendre, Le Désir politique de Dieu, 1988, Paris: Fayard, pp. 110, 222, 223.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1997 Peter Goodrich
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goodrich, P. (1997). Hermes and Institutional Structures: An Essay on Dogmatic Communication. In: Goodrich, P. (eds) Law and the Unconscious. Language, Discourse, Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25974-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25974-8_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-25976-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25974-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)