Skip to main content

Part of the book series: British Studies Series ((BRSS))

  • 31 Accesses

Abstract

Viewed from the perspective of the provinces, the English polity of the mid-nineteenth century differed profoundly from that of the mid-eighteenth. The state’s institutional superstructure had been dramatically modified. The Old Poor Law had given way to the New; Municipal Corporations had been remodelled, given a representative character, and were being extended to new industrial towns; the challenge of public health was increasingly likely to be confronted not by traditional authorities but by new public health unions; constables were becoming policemen; and inspectors of factories, prisons, and schools, were busily carrying a gospel of efficiency and good practice from the centre into the localities. The changes which were remodelling the English state were often couched in the language of ‘reform’. The transition from the eighteenth-century language of improvement to the nineteenth-century language of reform is of itself important, but the language of reform, at least as deployed in the years after 1820, carried increasingly heavy ideological and social baggage. Behind changes in the superstructural apparatus of the English state lay perhaps more important — and certainly more elusive — transitions in the social distribution of power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R. A. Lewis, Edwin Chadwick and the Public Health Movement 1832–1854 (London, 1952), pp. 271, 330; Chadwick, p. 403; Liberty and Locality, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Toulmin Smith, Local Self-Government and Centralization (London, 1851), pp. 67–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., quotations at 336, 344; J. Toulmin Smith, Local Self-government Un-mystified (London, 1857).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edwin Chadwick, Report on the Sanitary Conditions of the Labouring Population of Great Britain, 1842, ed. M. W. Flinn (Edinburgh, 1965), pp. 354–410, here at p. 380.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arnold, Culture and Anarchy, pp. 83–4; see also Stefan Collini, Matthew Arnold. A Critical Portrait (Oxford, 1994), esp. pp. 88–92.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. W. Burrow, ‘“The Village Community” and the Uses of History in Late Nineteenth-century England’, in N. McKendrick (ed.), Historical Perspectives. Studies in English Thought and Society (London, 1974), pp. 255–84; quotation at p. 280. See also Campbell, ‘Stubbs and the English State’;

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henry Sumner Maine, Village Communities in East and West’ 3rd edn (London, 1876).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richard Faber, Young England (London, 1987), p. 136; Smith, Gothic Bequest, pp. 191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jennifer Hart, ‘Ninteenth-century Social Reform: a Tory Interpretation of History’, Past and Present, xxi (1965), 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. V. Dicey, Lectures on the Relation Between Law and Opinion in England During the Nineteenth Century [1905], 2nd edn (London, 1948), pp. 126–210;

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elie Halévy, The Triumph of Reform, 2nd edn (London, 1950), pp. 60–129;

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. E. Finer, ‘The Transmission of Benthamite Ideas 1820–50’, in Gillian Sutherland (ed.), Studies in the Growth of Nineteenth-century Government (London, 1972), pp. 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anthony Brundage, ‘Ministers, Magistrates and Reformers: the Genesis of the Rural Constabulary Act of 1839’, Parliamentary History, v (1986), 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  14. William C. Lubenow, The Politics of Government Growth. Early Victorian Attitudes Towards State Intervention 1833–1848 (Newton Abbot, 1971), pp. 15–29, 69–188.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For a classic contemporary indictment, see Peter Gaskell’s study of Manchester in the mid-1830s, Artisans and Machinery; R. J. Morris, Cholera 1832 (London, 1976); Lewis, Edwin Chadwick and the Public Health Movement, pp. 34–6, 42–3, 150–1, 181–215; Lees, Cities Perceived, pp. 16–39.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Asa Briggs, The Age of Improvement, 1783–1867 (London, 1959), p. 335;

    Google Scholar 

  17. Norman Gash, Aristocracy and People. Britain 1815–1865 (London, 1979), pp. 341–2.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Anthony Brundage, England’s “Prussian Minister”. Edwin Chadwick and the Politics of Government Growth 1832–1854 (University Park, PA, 1988), p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Midwinter, Social Administration in Lancashire, pp. 79–120; Prest, Liberty and Locality, pp. 48–187; Robert Millward and Sally Sheard, ‘The Urban Fiscal Problem, 1870–1914: Government Expenditure and Finance in England and Wales’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., xlvii (1995), 501–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. E. P. Hennock, Fit and Proper Persons. Ideal and Reality in Nineteenth-century Urban Government (London, 1973), esp. pp. 61–176, 247–91;

    Google Scholar 

  21. Asa Briggs, Victorian Cities, Penguin edn (Harmondsworth, 1968), pp. 184–240.

    Google Scholar 

  22. U. R. Q. Henriques, ‘The Rise and Fall of the Separate System of Prison Discipline’, Past and Present, 54 (1972), 61–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. W. F. Monypenny and G. E. Buckle, The Life of Benjamin Disraeli, rev. 2 vol. edn (London, 1929), ii, p. 836.

    Google Scholar 

  24. [Benjamin Disraeli], The Letters of Runnymede (London, 1836); quotations at pp. 228, 226, and 231.

    Google Scholar 

  25. David Philips, ‘The Black County Magistracy 1835–1860’, Midland History, iii (1976), 161–90; Eastwood, Governing Rural England, p. 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. For an insightful analysis, see Jonathan Parry, The Rise and Fall of Liberal Government in Victorian Britain (New Haven and London, 1993), pp. 113–27, 203–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sir George Nicholls, A History of the Scotch Poor Law (London, 1856), pp. 134–84;

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. A. Cage, The Scottish Poor Law 1745–1845 (Edinburgh, 1981), pp. 140–51;

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. K. Webb, ‘A Whig Inspector’, Journal of Modern History, xxvii (1955), 352–64;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Peter Mandler, ‘Cain and Abel: Two Aristocrats and the Early Victorian Factory Acts’, Historical Journal, xxvii (1984), 83–109; Mandler, Aristocratic Government in the Age of Reform, pp. 131–82, 236–67; MacDonagh, Early Victorian Government, pp. 42–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. John Garrard, Leadership and Power in Victorian Industrial Towns 1830–88 (Manchester, 1983);

    Google Scholar 

  32. Patrick Joyce, Work, Society and Politics. The Culture of the Factory in later Victorian Britain (London, 1980), pp. 268–310.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cited in Andrea Tanner, ‘The City of London Poor Law Union 1839–1869’, Ph.D. thesis, University of London (1995), 82.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Driver, Power and Pauperism, 139–40; [George J. Dew], Oxfordshire Village Life: The Diaries of George James Dew (1846–1928), Relieving Officer, ed. Pamela Horn (Abingdon, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 David Eastwood

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eastwood, D. (1997). Remaking the Public Domain in Provincial England. In: Government and Community in the English Provinces, 1700–1870. British Studies Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25673-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25673-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-55286-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25673-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics