Skip to main content

Part of the book series: European History in Perspective ((EUROHIP))

  • 47 Accesses

Abstract

The last seven months of peace before August 1914 have been among the most intensely studied and hotly debated in the history of Europe. Explanations of the origins of the First World War have ranged from the absurdly simple to others of such complexity as to threaten to drive all but the most assiduous reader to despair. It has been attributed in particular to German ambition and militarism, or more generally to imperialism (variously defined), monopoly capitalism, the arms race, secret diplomacy, unbridled nationalism, the use of foreign policy to ease domestic problems, not to mention sundry combinations of these and other factors. The war has been described both as inevitable and avoidable. Alistair Home suggests that a ‘sort of impassioned triviality’ prevailed in 1914, while James Joll argues that the ‘rhetoric’ of imperialism contributed ‘even more than the reality’ to the widespread mood in Europe which made war possible, acceptable, and — in some cases — welcome.*

‘… in a certain sense it was a preventive war’. (Bethmann Hollweg)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See e.g. G. Ritter, The Sword and the Sceptre (1965), ii. 218–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. McDonald, United Government, (1994), p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Lieven, Nicholas II, pp. 195–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. McDonald, United Government, pp. 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. Berghahn, Germany, p. 136. The determinants of German foreign policy in the years leading to 1914 are carefully and lucidly discussed by J. Lowe, The Great Powers (1994), Chapters 3 and 4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. Berghahn, Germany, pp. 136–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid, pp. 140–2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid, pp. 140–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Joll, Origins, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. R. Williamson, Austria-Hungary and the Origins of the First World War (1991), pp. 4–6, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid, pp. 171 ff.; J. Joll, Origins, p. 92. John Leslie, The Antecedents of Austria-Hungary’s War Aims’, in Archiv und Forschung, band 20 (1993), pp. 307–94.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid, pp. 375–89, 394.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid, pp. 365–8. On Austria see F. Fellner, ‘Austria-Hungary’ in K. Wilson (ed.), Decisions for War, 1914 (1995), Chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Bridge, Habsburg Monarchy, p. 336.

    Google Scholar 

  15. On Moltke, see M. Balfour, Kaiser, pp. 263–4; J. C. G. Röhl, ‘Germany’ in K. Wilson, Decisions, Chapter 2; V. Berghahn, Germany, pp. 181–3. Critics of German policy (‘the most complete madness’) which led to war included business magnates Albert Ballin and Walter Rathenau, and the, diplomat, Prince Lichnowsky (see above Röhl ‘Germany’ p. 28).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Berghahn, Germany, pp. 175–8, 181 ff., 194–5. He stresses that policy-making was still the preserve of Wilhelm II and his advisers — a small’ strategic clique’. These were men who were guided by a narrow and dogmatic view of the world, with more than a few hints of a tendency to panic and overreact. Yet, they ‘were cool enough’ to try to calculate how much time they had in which to act before their position became desperate. Many scholars have underlined the growing fears of the German military and some civilian groups — notably the big landowners — at what they believed to be deteriorating prospects for the conservative order at home. War was preferable to slow death at home and abroad.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid, p. 198–200, 211.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Cornwall,’ serbia’ in K. Wilson, Decisions, pp. 77–80, and Chapter 3 passim.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Lieven, Nicholas II, pp. 204 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. McDonald, United Government, pp. 107, 204–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Lieven, Nicholas II, p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. Fuller, Strategy and Power, pp. 435–51; D. Lieven, Nicholas II, pp. 141–51.

    Google Scholar 

  23. V. Berghahn, Germany, p. 216.

    Google Scholar 

  24. For France and Britain, see J. F. V. Keiger, ‘France’, and K. Wilson, ‘Britain’ in K. Wilson, Decisions, Chapters 5 and 7; or at greater length, J. F. V. Keiger, France and the Origins of the First World War (1983); Z. Steiner, Britain and the Origins of the First World War (1977); M. Brock, ‘Britain enters the War’ in R. J. W. Evans and H. P. von Strandmann (eds.), The Coming of the First World War (1990), pp. 145–64; and K. Neilson, Britain and the Last Tsar, pp. 338–40, 370–1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 C. J. Bartlett

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bartlett, C.J. (1996). To August 1914 and the End of an Era. In: Peace, War and the European Powers, 1814–1914. European History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24958-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24958-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-62001-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24958-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics