Skip to main content

Self-Determination and the Disintegration of Yugoslavia: What Lessons for the International Community?

  • Chapter
Self-Determination
  • 138 Accesses

Abstract

While the tragic disintegration of Yugoslavia is a fait accompli, it may be asked whether it was inevitable. It may be asked whether it was an inescapable consequence of resurgent nationalism in post-communist Europe or, rather, the consequence of an inadequate response to what was essentially an artificial and manageable ethnic conflict. Indeed, there are many lessons to be learned from this tragic episode of modern history. For the international community, perhaps the single most important lesson is that turning moral issues into a realpolitik quagmire eventually exacts a heavy cost in terms of human rights as well as international peace and security. In the words of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, “recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”. In the emerging New World Order, the legitimacy and viability of the State must be premised on respect for fundamental human rights and freedoms; a theme which continuously emerges in the course of events leading to the disintegration of Yugoslavia.

The author wishes to express his gratitude to Professor Karen Knop, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, for her useful comments and suggestions on this paper. The views expressed in this article are only those of the author, in his personal capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Siber, “Yugoslav PM Pleads with Rebel Republics”, Financial Times, 25 June 1991, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dr Borislav Jovic, Address (Assembly of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, 19 March 1991), reprinted in Review of International Affairs, Belgrade, 1 April 1992, at 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See: Ian Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law, 4th edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), at 90–1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A widely accepted formulation of the basic criteria of statehood which is considered as a codification of customary international law is contained in Article I of the 1933 Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States: The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) a defined territory; (c) government; (d) capacity to enter into relations with other states. (1936) 165 LNTS 19 These characteristics are based primarily on the principle of “effectiveness”. It has been suggested that the shortest definition of statehood is “a stable political community, supporting a legal order, in a certain area”: Ian Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law, 4th edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), at 73.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, UNGA Res. 2625(XXV), Annex, 25 UN GAOR, Suppl. (no. 28), UN Doc. A/5217 (1970), at 121.

    Google Scholar 

  6. US/EC Declaration on the Recognition of the Yugoslav Republics (Brussels, 10 March 1992), Review of International Affairs, 1 April 1992, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Statement of Principles for New Constitutional Arrangements for Bosnia and Herzegovina, Review of International Affairs, Belgrade, 1 April 1992, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Judah, “Embattled Bosnia Appeals to World as Bombing Continues”, The Times, 11 April 1992, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See: Frontier Dispute case, [1986] ICJ Rep. 6, at 565.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Asbjorn Eide, Sub-Commission Study, para. 157, p. 32 (emphasis added).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Human Rights Committee, Communication No. 167/1984, CCPR/C/38/D/167/1984, adopted on 26 March 1990, para. 32.1, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Human Rights Committee, Communication No. 205/1986, CCPR/C/43/D/205/1986, adopted on 4 November 1991, para. 5.5, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Akhavan, P. (1996). Self-Determination and the Disintegration of Yugoslavia: What Lessons for the International Community?. In: Clark, D., Williamson, R. (eds) Self-Determination. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24918-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics