Skip to main content
  • 16 Accesses

Abstract

In 1952, at the opening of the intergovernmental conference on the establishment of the European Coal and Steel Community, Jean Monnet spoke the historic words: “Nous sommes là pour accomplir une oeuvre commune, non pour négocier des avantages mais pour rechercher notre avantage dans l’avantage commun”. In his view this common advantage was the safeguarding of peace through the mutual economic dependence of the members of a strong supranational institution. In practical policy-making the attention has shifted from common advantages to member-country advantages. This is only logical as the cohesion of the EC is based on a fair distribution of cost and benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balassa, B. (ed.) (1975), European Economic Integration, Amsterdam: North-Holland/American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. and R. Lyons (1991), “External economies and European integration: the potential for self-fulfilling expectations”, in The Economics of EMU, European Economy Special Edition 1, 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIPE (1992), Previsions glissantes détaillées: la France dans I’Europe de 1997, Paris: Synthèse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J. and P. Artisien (1987), North-South Direct Investment in the European Communities, London: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cecchini, P. et al. (1988), The European Challenge 1992: The Benefits of a Single Market, Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1977), Report of the Study Group on the Role of Public Finance in European Integration (G. D. A. MacDougall et al.), Economy and Finance Series 1, General Report, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1983), The Europeans and their Regions, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1989), Report on Economic and Monetary Union in the European Community (Delors Committee), Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1990), “One market, one money: an evaluation of the potential benefits and costs of forming an Economic and Monetary Union”, European Economy 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1991a), “Fair competition in the internal market: Community state-aid policy”, European Economy 48, 7–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1991b), Eurobarometer 35, June, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1992), Eurobarometer 38, December, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPR (1992), “Is bigger better? The economics of EC enlargement”, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M. et al. (1988), “The economics of 1992: an assessment of the potential economic effects of completing the internal market of the European Community”, European Economy 35/3, 5–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Coal and Steel Community (1953), Report on Problems raised by the Different Turnover Tax Systems applied within the Common Market (Tinbergen, J. et al.), Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice (1985), Judgement of the Court in case 13/83, European Parliament vs. Council of the European Communities, 22 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasiorek, M., A. Smith and A. Venables (1992), “1992, trade and welfare: a general equilibrium model”, paper for the CEPR Paris Conference, “Trade Policies and Trade Flows after 1992”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grauwe, P. De et al. (1989), De Europese Monetaire Integratie: Vier Visies, Den Haag: WRR/V66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaland, J. and V. Norman (1992), “Global production effects of European integration”, paper for the CEPR Paris Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Márquez Méndez, A. J. (1986), Economic Integration and Growth in Europe, London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Márquez Méndez, A. J. (1990), “Economic cohesion in Europe: the impact of the Delors Plan”, Journal of Common Market Studies 29, 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. H. and Spencer, J. E. (1977), “The static economic effects of the UK joining the EEC: a general equilibrium approach”, Review of Economic Studies 44, 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molle, W. (1990), The Economics of European Integration: Theory, Practice, Policy, Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molle, W., J. de Koning and C. Zandvliet (1992), “Can foreign aid reduce East-West migration in Europe?”, Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnet, J. (1976), Mémoires, Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, N. (1983), Economies of Scale, Competitiveness and Trade Patterns within the European Community, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padoa-Schioppa, T. et al. (1987), Efficiency, Stability and Equity: A Strategy for the Evolution of the Economic System of the European Community, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelktnans, J. (1986), Completing the Internal Market for Industrial Products, Brussels: Commission of the EC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelkmans, J. and A. Winters (1988), Europe’s Domestic Market (Chatham House Paper 43), London: Routledge for Royal Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrochilos, G. A. (1989), Foreign Direct Investment and the Development Process, Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. and Venables, A. J. (1988), “Completing the internal market in the EC: some industry simulations”, European Economic Review 32, 1501–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaak, P.-H. et al. (1956), Rapport des Chefs de Délégation aux Ministres des Affaires Etrangères (Comité intergouvernemental créé par la Conference de Messine), Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triffin, R. (1992), “IMS: International Monetary System or Scandal?”, Florence: European Parliamentary Union/European University Institute, Jean Monnet Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdoorn, P. J. (1952), “Welke zijn de achtergronden en vooruitzichten van de economische integratie in Europa en welke gevolgen zou deze integratie hebben, met name voor de welvaart in Nederland?” Overdruk 22, Centraal Planbureau, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viaene, J.-M. (1982), “A customs union between Spain and the EEC”, European Economic Review 18, 345–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, M. (1989), “The European Community” in Pechman, J. A. (ed.), The Role of the Economist in Government: An International Perspective, New York/London: Harvester/Wheatsheaf, 279–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, P. et al. (1970), “Report to the Council, Commission on the realisation by stages of economic and monetary union in the Community”, Bulletin of the EC 11, supplement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whichart, O.G. (1981), “Trends in the US direct investment position abroad, 1950–1979”, US Department of Commerce Survey of Current Business 61.2, 39–56, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1994 Centre for European Policy Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Molle, W. (1994). European integration: economic analysis and social reality. In: Mortensen, J. (eds) Improving Economic and Social Cohesion in the European Community. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23438-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics