Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Critics Debate ((TCD))

  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

Fascinating source studies for The Turn of the Screw abound, most of which deal with James’s adherence to or departure from Gothic and melodramatic conventions. The specific genesis of the tale, as recounted by James in his Preface to the volume of the New York Edition containing it, is well-known: in January 1895, James heard a story of small children menaced by the spirits of wicked servants on a remote estate; somewhat paradoxically, this account of hellish visitation was related by Edward White Benson, Archbishop of Canterbury. Like the ‘germs’ or données of so many of James’s fictions, this one consisted of the merest description of a potentially melodramatic situation and almost no details at all. Indeed, James had something of a reputation among those who knew his work habits for resisting the full account of a story that struck him as having fictional potential and allowing nothing to interfere with his sui generis elaboration of it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

12 Source criticism

  • Beidler, Peter, Ghosts, Demons, and Henry James: The Turn of the Screw at the Turn of the Century (Columbia, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackall, Jean Frantz, ‘Cruikshank’s Oliver and The Turn of the Screw’, American Literature, 51 (1979), pp. 161–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edel, Leon and Adeline R. Tintner, ‘The Private Life of Peter Quin(t): Origins of “The Turn of the Screw”’, Henry James Review, 6 (1985), pp. 2–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Hans Joachim, ‘The Turns in The Turn of the Screw’, Jahrbuch für Amerikastudien, 9 (1964), pp. 110–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardin, Jane, ‘The Turn of the Screw: The Victorian Background’, Mosaic, 12 (1978), pp. 131–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry, Alice Hall, ‘Jamesian Parody, Jane Eyre, and ‘The Turn of the Screw’, Modern Language Studies, 13 (1983), pp. 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roellinger, Francis X., Jr., ‘Psychical Research and The Turn of the Screw’, American Literature, 20 (1949), pp. 401–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryburn, May L., ‘The Turn of the Screw and Amelia: A Source for Quint?’, Studies in Short Fiction, 16 (1979), pp. 235–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherero, Elliot M., ‘Exposure in The Turn of the Screw’, Modern Philology, 78 (1981), pp. 261–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Robert Lee, ‘The Genesis of The Turn of the Screw’, American Literature, 13 (1941), pp. 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 David Kirby

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kirby, D. (1991). Source criticism. In: The Portrait of a Lady and The Turn of the Screw. The Critics Debate. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21424-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics