Skip to main content

Resident Participation Issues through the Prism of Israel’s Project Renewal

  • Chapter
Neighbourhood Policy and Programmes

Part of the book series: Policy Studies Organization Series ((PSOS))

Abstract

Citizen participation and neighborhood rehabilitation have received considerable attention in the last two decades and, to a large extent, have been inextricably linked. It is in the context of neighborhood rehabilitation that citizen involvement has been most implemented, most prominent and most controversial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alterman, Rachelle, Arza Churchman and Hubert Law Yone (1981), A handbook for public participation in planning (Haifa: Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Center for Urban and Regional Studies) (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Armistead, Jeff, Susan Fainstein and Norman Fainstein (1980), Community development block grants: citizen participation and the representation of interests (Washington, D.C.: Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Neighborhood Organization Research Group).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, Sherry (1969), ‘A ladder of citizen participation’ Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4), pp. 216–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachelor, Lynn and Bryan Jones (1981), ‘Managed participation: Detroit’s neighborhood opportunity fund’, Journal of Applied and Behavioral Science 17 (4), pp. 518–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, Arza (1987), ‘Can resident participation in neighborhood rehabilitation programs succeed: Israel’s Project Renewal through a comparative perspective’, in Irwin Altman and Abraham Wandersman (eds) Neighborhood and community environments (New York: Plenum Press) pp. 113–62.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, Arza (1985), Resident involvement and participation in Israel’s Project Renewal (Haifa: Samuel Neaman Institute for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Richard (1974), Citizen participation and the urban policy process (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Draisen, Marc (1983), ‘Fostering effective citizen participation: lessons from three urban renewal neighborhoods in The Hague’, in Lawrence Susskind and Michael Elliott (eds) Paternalism, conflict and coproduction (New York: Plenum Press) pp. 239–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, Ken (1978), ‘The role of community involvement in low income housing’, Man-Environment Systems 8 (3), pp. 113–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, Bernard and Marhsall Kaplan (1975), The politics of neglect: urban aid from model cities to revenue sharing (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk, David and John Zeisel (1983), ‘Coproducing urban renewal in The Netherlands’, in Lawrence Susskind and Michael Elliott (eds) Paternalism, conflict and coproduction (New York: Plenum Press) pp. 291–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Ronald (1973), ‘National strategies for neighborhood control and citizen participation’, in George Frederickson (ed.) Neighborhood control in the 1970s (New York: Chandler) pp. 179–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Ian (1984), ‘The citizens’ coalition in Milwaukee’, Social Policy 15 (1), pp. 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, Roger and Myrna Breitbart (1974), Participation, decentralization and advocacy planning (Washington, D.C.: Commission on College Geography, Resource Paper no. 25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kweit, Mary and Robert Kweit (1981), Implementing citizen participation in a bureaucratic society (New York: Praeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Judith (1973), ‘Two model cities: negotiations in Oakland’, in George Frederickson (ed.) Neighborhood control in the 1970s (New York: Chandler) pp. 217–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, Janice (1983), ‘Citizen action and participation in Madrid’, in Lawrence Susskind and Michael Elliott (eds) Paternalism, conflict and coproduction (New York: Plenum Press) pp. 207–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, Janice and Hans Spiegel (1983), ‘Copenhagen’s black quadrant: the facade and reality of participation’, in Lawrence Susskind and Michael Elliott (eds) Paternalism, conflict and coproduction (New York: Plenum Press) pp. 35–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, Hanna (1967), The concept of representation (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakodi, Carol (1983), ‘The World Bank experience: mass community participation in the Lusaka squatter upgrading project’, in C. Moser (ed.) Evaluating community participation in urban development projects (London: Bartlett School of Architecture and Planning Development Planning Unit) pp. 18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosener, Judy (1978), ‘Citizen participation: can we measure its effectiveness?’ Public Administration Review 38, pp. 457–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, Lawrence and Michael Elliott (1983), ‘Paternalism, conflict and coproduction’, in Lawrence Susskind and Michael Elliott (eds) Paternalism, conflict and coproduction (New York: Plenum Press) pp. 3–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vonk, Frans (1983), ‘Citizen participation in The Netherlands: some comments’, in Lawrence Susskind and Michael Elliott (eds) Paternalism, conflict and coproduction (New York: Plenum Press), pp. 343–50.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, Abraham (1979), ‘User participation: a study of types of participation, effects, mediators and individual differences’, Environment and Behavior 11 (2), pp. 185–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, Abraham (1984), ‘Citizen Participation’, in Kenneth Heller, R. Price, Shulamit Reinharz, Stephanie Riger and Abraham Wandersman (eds) Psychology and community change: challenge of the future (Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press) pp. 337–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooley, Tom (1985), ‘Community architecture: an assessment of the case for user participation in design’, in Stephan Klein, Richard Wener and Sheila Lehman (eds) EDRA 16/1985 (Washington, D.C.: Environmental Design Research Association) pp. 250–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 Policy Studies Organization

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Churchman, A. (1990). Resident Participation Issues through the Prism of Israel’s Project Renewal. In: Carmon, N. (eds) Neighbourhood Policy and Programmes. Policy Studies Organization Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21057-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics