Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The New Palgrave ((NPA))

Abstract

The Arrow-Debreu model is the basic model in which the two classical welfare theorems of economics are expressed. Under quite general assumptions, it can be shown that, first, a competitive equilibrium allocation, or Walrasian allocation, is Pareto efficient (Pareto optimal); second, under somewhat different assumptions, any Pareto efficient allocation will be a competitive equilibrium allocation after some suitable redistribution of initial endowments. Implicitly or explicitly, the statement of the first welfare theorem assumes that all economic agents have the same information about all economic variables. This is not to say that uncertainty is ruled out; there may be uncertainty as long as all agents are identically uncertain. If this assumption of symmetric information is violated, the competitive outcome will no longer be guaranteed to be Pareto efficient. The introduction of asymmetric information into various economic problems has given us new insight into how market failures might arise and whether there may be governmental, or other non-market, corrections which can improve welfare. Several examples illustrating this are given below.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Akerlof, G. 1970. The market for lemons. Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, 488–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. and Stiglitz, J. 1980. Lectures on Public Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, C. and Nalebuff, B. 1984. Dragon-slaying and ballroom dancing: the private supply of a public good. Journal of Public Economics 25, August, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. and Myerson, R. 1983. Efficient and durable decision rules with incomplete information. Econometrica 51, November, 1799–1820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J. and Wilson, R. 1982. Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory 27, August, 245–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. 1982a. Predation, reputation, and entry deterrence. Journal of Economic Theory 27, August, 280–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. 1982b. Limit pricing and entry under incomplete information: an equilibrium analysis. Econometrica 50, 443–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. 1979. Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica 47, 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. 1985. Implicit contracts: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature 23, September, 1144–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

John Eatwell Murray Milgate Peter Newman

Copyright information

© 1989 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Postlewaite, A. (1989). Asymmetric Information. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds) Allocation, Information and Markets. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20215-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics