Skip to main content
  • 92 Accesses

Abstract

The Green Hat vexed the critics. Ralph Wright, reviewing it for the New Statesman, found Michael Arlen ‘an irritating writer’. Wright was particularly irritated by the ‘smart and thin style’ of Arlen’s prose, the boastful parade of knowledge about modern literature, and, last but not least, by the self-assurance of the man-about-town on matters related to women and sex:

There is a sort of epigrammatic cocksureness on all the details of love-making that I find particularly unpleasant: an assumption that love has something to do with silk underclothing at one moment and at the next a rhetoric outburst on almost Wellsian lines of optimism. I do wish he [Arlen] would be a little more modest and show a little better taste when dealing with the subject.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Claude C. Washburn, ‘Sophistication’, Opinions (Constable, 1926) p.53.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alec Waugh reviewed it as ‘Is this George Moore?’ — Michael J. Arlen, Exiles (André Deutsch, 1971) p.65.

    Google Scholar 

  3. On the relationship with Orage see Martin Wallace, The New Age under Orage (Manchester University Press, 1967)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Philip Mairet, A. R. Orage: A Memoir (Dent, 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harry Keyishian, Michael Arlen (Twayne, 1975) p.21.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lawrence mentions him in seven letters, and one, to Lady Ottoline Morrell, is especially perceptive: ‘Kouyoumdjian seems a bit blatant and pushing … but it is because he is very foreign even though he does not know it himself. In English life he is a strange alien medium’ — The Collected Letters, ed. Harry T. Moore (Heinemann, 1962) I, 396.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For the American stage production see Katherine Cornell, I Wanted to he an Actress (Random House, 1938).

    Google Scholar 

  8. For the London production consult James Agate, The Contemporary Theatre, 1925 (Chapman and Hall, 1926)

    Google Scholar 

  9. and Noël Coward, Present Indicative: An Autobiography (W. Heinemann, 1937).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Evelyn Waugh, Brideshead Revisited (Penguin, 1982) p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Michael Arlen, The Green Hat: A Romance for a Few People (Collins, 1924) p.6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roger Abingdon, The Green Mat: A Romance for Askew People (Collins, 1925) p.15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ford Corey, ‘Three Rousing Cheers!!! The Parody Adventures of our Youthful Heroes. The Rollo Boys with Sherlock in Mayfair or, Keep it under your Green Hat’, Bookman, vol. 62, no. 5 (Jan 1926) p.584.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Grant Overton, Cargoes for Crusoes (Appleton and George J. Doran, 1924) pp.272, 275.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The best study of Nancy Cunard’s life is Anne Chisholm’s well documented Nancy Cunard (Penguin, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  16. For additional information see Daphne Fielding, Emerald and Nancy: Lady Cunard and her Daughter (Athenaum, 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  17. and Hugh Ford (ed.), Nancy Cunard: Brave Poet, Indomitable Rebel, 1896–1965 (Chilton Books, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Billie Melman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Melman, B. (1988). 1924: The Green Hat. In: Women and the Popular Imagination in the Twenties. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19099-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics