Abstract
The concept of right, we already hinted, carries elements which allow for two quite distinct senses: one which interlocks with claims both to and against, and a second sense which also affirms one’s claim or right to act in a certain way, yet does so without asserting a duty on the other side or claim against. Such is a right of self-defence, or a right to criticise, or to divorce or separate, or to terminate a contract, or to give notice to a tenant, or the right to compete in trade, or the right to picket.1 We shall call these defensive rights, sometimes called liberties or liberty-rights, to distinguish them from rights with correlative duties or fully assertive rights.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
See R. W. Downie, ‘The Right to Criticise’, Philosophy, 44 (1969) p. 116.
D. D. Raphael, ‘Human Rights’, Aristotelian Society Supplement, 39 (1965) pp. 206–7; and see also his Problems of Political Philosophy (London, 1970) pp. 68–70.
See G. Marshall, ‘Rights, Options and Entitlements’, in A. W. B. Simpson (ed.) Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (1973) pp. 228, 231–2.
Glanville Williams, ‘The Concept of Liberty’, in R. S. Summers (ed.) Essays in Legal Philosophy (Oxford, 1968) pp. 121, 136ff.
Copyright information
© 1984 S. J. Stoljar
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stoljar, S. (1984). Rights as Defences and Liberties. In: An Analysis of Rights. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17607-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17607-6_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-17609-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17607-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)