Skip to main content

Part of the book series: St Antony’s/Macmillan Series

  • 28 Accesses

Abstract

The rapid industrialization of Russia in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries had willy-nilly laid the foundations for the formation of an indigenous industrial bourgeoisie. This process was not, however, accompanied by an aggrandizement of political power which its Western counterparts had obtained as part and parcel of their economic ascendance. During the first year of the Great War it became apparent that the state would have to draw on the economic strength which industrialists could command to furnish the necessary articles of war. But the Tsarist administration was loath to relinquish control over the deployment of the empire’s economic resources of the country. The creation of the Special Council was a partial concession to private industry as represented by a ‘commercial-industrial circle’. But the Petrograd financier-industrialists who comprised the circle were the least likely to demand political changes, having established a close partnership with the military departments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. T.D. Krupina, ‘Politicheskii krizis’, p. 65. There are a number of discrepancies between the table presented by Krupina and the account in S.A. Somov, ’O “maiskom” Osobom soveshchanii’, rstoriia SSSR no. 3 (1973) p. 119. Krupina is more reliable.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gos. Duma, IV Sozyv: Sten. otchety, ses. 4, zas. 4 (1 Aug. 1915) cols 300–3, 324.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.N. Iakhontov, ‘Tiazhelye dni: sekretnye zasedaniia Soveta ministrov 16 iiulia-2 sentiabria 1915 g.’, ARR, vol. XVIII (Berlin, 1926) p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. I.F. Gindin, ‘Problemy istorii fevral’skoi revoliutsii i ee sotsial’no-ekonomicheskykh predposilok’, Istoriia SSSR, no. 4 (1967) pp. 40–69;

    Google Scholar 

  5. and V.S. Diakin, ‘Chto takoe Progressivnyi blok?’, Voprosy istorii no. 1 (1970) pp. 200–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P.N. Miliukov, Rossiia na perelome, 2 vols (Paris, 1927) vol. I, pp. 12–13; Laverychev, Po tu storonu barrikad, p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burahuaaiia nakanune pp. 29–31; see also V.I. Startsev, Russkaia burzhuaziia i samoderzhavie v 1905–1917 gg. (Bor’ba vokrug ‘otvetstvennogo ministerstva’ i ’Pravitel’stva doveriia’) (Leningrad, 1977) pp. 137–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burahuaaiia nakanune pp. 38, 41; A. Ia. Grunt, ‘Progressivnyi blok’, Voprosy istorii no. 3–4 (1945) p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Balabanov, Ot 1905 k 1917: Massovoe rabochee dviahenie (Moscow and Leningrad, 1927) p. 409.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1983 Lewis H. Siegelbaum

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Siegelbaum, L.H. (1983). The High Politics of Defence, June–September 1915. In: The Politics of Industrial Mobilization in Russia, 1914–17. St Antony’s/Macmillan Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17316-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17316-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-17318-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17316-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics