Abstract
Thinking about sexual behaviour has in the past two decades within our society gone through astonishing twists and turns, radically transforming publicly acclaimed values and mores. No more pertinent index of this has been the rise to fame and acclaim of the homosexual Quentin Crisp. The drama-documentary of Crisp’s life, The Naked Civil Servant, has been applauded both as a brilliant piece of television and as a tribute to a noble figure: as Crisp mutters when confronted by some hooligans, he has become ‘one of the stately homos of England’. What is particularly revealing, though, is the acceptance of Crisp as someone whose attitudes, values and behaviour were not to be held in contempt but rather to be seen as the deep emotions and passions of a person of enormous integrity and courage. Peter Prince captured the mood well in his review (December 1975) in the New Statesman:
And to Quentin Crisp himself, of course. What a satisfactory life his must seem now. From early prolonged disgrace, he has grown, as is his proud boast, into one of ‘the stately homos of England’ and has watched the culture grow too, in his direction, so that gaiety, colour, originality have become valued in a man instead of despised. And to think too how many ex-colonial governors, retired generals, and remaindered judges and statesmen and commissioners of police must have sat biting their knuckles in fury as The Naked Civil Servant unreeled. Once in palmier days they might have anticipated that one day a grateful nation would be bestowing on them the kind of affectionate, graceful tributes that they now saw being lavished on this frightful pansy. Changed, utterly changed. For them now the long years of neglect and debilitation in Surrey or Wilts, the slow descent into the unlauded grave. And for Quentin Crisp at last a place in the sun. A lovely transformation. Pure Christmas.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
L. Trilling, ‘The Kinsey Report’, in The Liberal Imagination: Essays on Literature and Society (Secker & Warburg, 1951 ).
NVALA, Report on the School Broadcasting Monitoring Project, covering Programmes Dealing with Ethical, Social and Personal Topics (Autumn 1970).
In Malcolm Muggeridge, Tread Softly for You Tread on My Jokes (Fontana, 1972) p. 44.
For the full text, see Mary Whitehouse, Who Does She Think She Is? (NEL, 1972) Appendix 1.
See D. Holbrook, ‘The Destruction of the Erotic’, The Times, 26 August 1971;
Holbrook in Lord Longford, Pornography: The Longford Report (Coronet, 1972) pp. 162–76;
Holbrook, ‘Sick, Sick, Sick’, Guardian, 2 September 1972.
J. Robinson, Honest to God (SCM, 1963 ).
J. Robinson, But That I Can’t Believe (Fontana, 1967) p. 34.
J. Dominion, The Church and the Sexual Revolution (SCM, 1971) pp. 14–15.
B. Brophy, The Longford Threat to Freedom ( National Secular Society, 1972 ). Precisely, Whitehouse would argue, it is not that she is just against outrage, more significantly she is against change.
Copyright information
© 1979 Michael Tracey and David Morrison
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tracey, M., Morrison, D. (1979). Sex and Mary Whitehouse. In: Whitehouse. Communications and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16200-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16200-0_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-23791-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16200-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)