Skip to main content

Power and politics in organizations

  • Chapter
Management

Abstract

In the UK in the late 1980s, many polytechnics were about to become universities, of which Fairisle Polytechnic was one. At this time, however, they were still under the control of local authorities and they still provided non-advanced further education (NAFE) course — work of sub-degree standard. It was becoming clear that this level of work was regarded by the government as the province of the local authority institutions. It would only be left in the hands of the new universities if there was no alternative local provider, and in Fairisle there were several competent others. It followed that any site which was designated a NAFE site by the Asset Commission would revert to the local authority when they decided on the terms of separation, i.e. ‘divorce and alimony’. Fairisle currently occupied as one of its many sites a campus at Fawley Ridge, an area of prime residential land, rapidly appreciating in value and conservatively estimated to be worth at contemporary prices around £1.5 million as a piece of land alone. The new university would need such an asset given its desperate need for building space — but the site was almost exclusively NAFE, being devoted to evening classes in a huge range of languages and providing daytime courses for local business people. Only the highest level of linguistic qualification offered was regarded officially as being ‘advanced’ for funding purposes — and this was only 5 percent of the total workload.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthony, P (1994) Managing Culture Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, S. and Baratz, M.S. (1962) ‘Two faces of power’, American Political Science Review 56(4), November 947–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, F.G. (1970) Strategems and Spoils, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbalet, J.M. (1986) ‘Power and resistance’, British Journal of Sociology 36(1): 521–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. and Mouton, J. (1978) The New Managerial Grid, Houston: Gulf

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolman, L.G. and Deal,T.E. (1991) Reframing Organizations:Artistry, Choice and Leadership, San Francisco: JosseyBass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, D. and Badham, R. (1998) Winning the Game: Power, Politics, and Organizational Change, London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, London: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G. (1988)’Modernism, postmodernism and organization studies 2: The contribution of Michel Foucault’, Organization Studies 9(2): 221–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, C. (1987) ‘Merit and gender: Organisations and mobilisations of masculine bias’, Australian Journal of Social Issues 22(2): 424–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, C. (1991) The Promise and the Price:The Struggle for Equal Opportunity in Women’s Employment, Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrt,W.J. (1973) Theories of Organisation, Sydney: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canetti, E. (1987) Crowds and Power, Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst (1996) Women in Corporate Leadership: Progress and Prospects, NewYork: Catalyst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (ed.) (1973) Man and Organizations: The Search for Explanation and Social Relevance, London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S.R. and Dunkerley, D. (1980) Organizations, Class and Control, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S.R. (1989) Frameworks of Power, London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S.R. (1990) Modern Organizations: Organization Studies in the Postmodern World London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S.R. (1994) ‘Power relations and the constitution of the resistant subject’ in fermier, J., Nord, W. and Knights, D. (eds), Resistance and Power in Organizations: Agency, Subjectivity and the Labour Process, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe,T. (1992) The Key to the Men’s Club, London: Institute of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, D. (1994)’Strategies of resistance: Power, knowledge and subjectivity in the workplace’, in Jermier,,J., Nord, W. Knights, D. (eds), Resistance and Power in Organizations: Agency, Subjectivity and the Labour Process, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.C. (1990) ‘Canetti’s sting’, SCOS Notework 9 (2/3): 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M, (1964) The Bureaucratic Phenomenon Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1957) ‘The concept of power’, Behavioural Science 2 July: 201–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, S. (1986) Analysing Organisations, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R.J. (1995) ‘The power in demography: Women’s social construction of gender identity at work’, Academy of Management Journal 38: 589–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, J. and Browne, M. (1996) Principles of Strategic Management, Melbourne: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J.R.P. and Raven, B. (1959) ‘The bases of social power’, in Cartwright, L. and Zander, A. (eds), Group Dynamics, Research and Theory, London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, F. and Fulop, L. (1992) ‘Conflict and power in organisations’, in Fulop, L. with Frith, F. and Hayward, H., Management for Australian Business:A Critical Text, Melbourne: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulop, L. (1992) ‘Bureaucracy and the Modern Manager’, in Fulop, L. with Frith, F. and Hayward, H., Management forAustralian Business:A Critical Text, Melbourne: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, M.P. and Glazer, PM, (1989) Whistle-Blowers: Exposing Corruption in Government and Industry, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1979) GenderAdvertisements New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollam, P. (1997)’Successful staff selection:The value of acknowledging women’, Management October: 25–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner,,A.W. (1954) Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy New York:The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1985) Understanding Organizations (third edition), Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C. (1994) ‘Power and politics in organisations’, in Hardy, C. (ed.), Managing Strategic Action: Mobilizing Change, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C. and Leiba-O’Sullivan, S. (1998) ‘The power behind empowerment: implications for research and practice’, Human Relations 15(4): 451–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, D.J. and McCullough,A.F. (1980) ‘Power in organizations’ in Salaman, G. and Thompson, K. (eds), Control and Ideology in Organizations, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, D.J., Hinings, C.R., Lee, C.A., Schneck, R.E. and Pennings,J.M. (1971) ‘The strategic contingencies theory of intraorganisational power’, Administrative Science Quarterly 16(2):216–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J.E. and Bearley, W.L. (1988) Empowerment Profile, King of Prussia, PA: Organization Design and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, RM. (1977a) ‘Power games in the corporation’, Psychology Today July: 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. (1977b) Men and Women of the Corporation New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. (1979) ‘Power failure in management circuits’, Harvard Business Review 57 (4): 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. (1982) ‘The middle manager as innovator’, Harvard Business Review 60(4): 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. (I 983) The Change Masters: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the American Corporation, New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. (1989a) ‘Swimming in newstreams: Mastering innovation dilemmas’, California Management Review 31(4):45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. (1989b) ‘The new managerial work’, Harvard Business Review 67(6): 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. (1989c) When Giants Learn to Dance: Mastering the Challenge of Strategy, Management and Careers in the I 990s, NewYork: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, B. and Case, T. (1990) ‘How to become an influential manager’, Academy of Management Executive 4: 38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkbride, P.S. (1985) ‘The concept of power: A lacuna in industrial relations theory?’, journal of Industrial Relations 27(3): 265–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotter,J. (1977) ‘Power, dependence, and effective management’, Harvard Business Review 55 (4): 125–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D. and Vurdubakis,T (1994) ‘Power, resistance and all that’, in Jermier,, J.M., Nord, W.R. and Knights, D. (eds), Resistance and Power in Organizations:Agency, Subjectivity and the Labour Process, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kram, K.E. (1985) Mentoring at Work, Glenview, III.: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansbury, R.K. and Spillane, R. (1983) Organisational Behaviour in the Australian Context Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linstead, S. (1997) ‘Resistance and return: Power, command and change management’, Studies in Cultures Organizations and Societies 3(1): 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1974) Power:A Radical View, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddock, S. and Parkin, D. (1994) ‘Gender cultures: How they affect men and women at work’, in Davidson, M. and Burke, R. (eds), Women in Management: Current Research Issues, London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margretta, J. (1997)’Will She Fit In?’, Harvard Business Review March—April: 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. (1995) Women Managers Moving On: Exploring Career and Life Choices, London: Routledge. Mauss, M. ( 1990 ) The Gift, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (1960) The Human Side of Enterprise, NewYork: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechanic, D. (1962) ‘Sources of power of lower participants in complex organisations’, Administrative Science Quarterly 7: 349–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1983) Power In and Around Organisations Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1989) Mintzberg on Management: Inside Our Strange World of Organisations, New York and London: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D.W. and Humphreys, N.J. (1985) ‘The caveats in mentorship’, Business Horizons 28 (4): 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1981) Power in Organisations London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, D.S., Hickson, D.J. and Hinings, C.R. (1983) Writers on Organizations, Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragins, B.R. (1997) ‘Diversified mentoring relationships in organizations: A power perspective’, Academy of Management Review 22 (2): 482–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. (1985) Redirections in Organisational Analysis, New York: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. (1984) Theories of power’, in Kababadse, A. and Parker, C. (eds), Power, Politics, and Organisations:A Behavioural Science View, London: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salaman, G. (1979) Work Organisations, Resistance and Control, London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1970) The Theory of Organisations, London: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. (1997) Have times changed? Career barriers and the token woman manager’, British Journal of Management (Special Issue) 8: 5121–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M. (1988) Business Ethics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1964) The Theory of Social Economic Organization, London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, W., Dougherty,T..W. and Dreher, G.F. (1991) ‘Relationship of career mentoring and socioeconomic origins to managers’ and professionals’ early career progress’, Academy of ManagementJournal 34: 331–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 L. Fulop and S. Linstead

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fulop, L., Linstead, S., Frith, F. (1999). Power and politics in organizations. In: Management. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15064-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics