Skip to main content

Corporate Social Accounting and the Capitalist Enterprise

  • Chapter
Critical Accounts

Abstract

Since 1970 some accountants have shown an interest in new forms of corporate reporting which differ markedly from traditional practices. What characterises Corporate Social Accounting (CSA) is its concern with a widening of both the content of accounting reports and the audience at which they are aimed. The view taken by supporters of CSA is that modern business enterprises have responsibilities which are wider than their legal obligations to shareholders, and encompass social obligations to other ‘stakeholders’. The ASSC (1975) lists the stakeholders of a firm as: equity investors; loan creditors; employees; analyst-advisors; business contacts; and the government. Others have widened the list to include consumers and the community or neighbourhood (Ramanathan, 1976). These stakeholders are seen as actual or potential users of information to be provided by accountants. Following this redefinition of ‘users’ the content of accounting reports is redefined. For external reports on business to the wider society, accounts should include the ‘social contribution of an individual firm’ (Ramanathan 1976; Council for Economic Development, 1971; Estes, 1976). This form of CSA, Social Responsibility Accounting, deals with ‘externalities’ and attempts to account for the impact that a company has on society-in-general. For internal accounting, Employee Accounting is suggested as part of an overall strategy of ‘open management’, with reports to include information on job satisfaction and career opportunities as well as existing management information which could be used by trade unions (Ramanathan, 1976; Owen, 1982).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Armstrong, P., ‘Changing Managerial Control Strategies: The Role of Competition Between Accountancy and Other Organisational Professions’, Accounting Organizations and Society (1985) pp. 129–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASSC, The Corporate Report (London: Accounting Standards Steering Committee, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B., Unequal Shares: Wealth in Britain (London: Allen Lane, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barratt Brown, M., ‘The Controllers of British Industry’, in K. Coates (ed.), Can the Workers Run Industry? (London: Sphere Books Ltd., 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., Business Behaviour, Value and Growth (New York: Macmillan, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston, G. J., ‘Accounting and Corporate Accountability’, Accounting Organizations and Society (1982) pp. 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A. A., Power Without Property (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A. A. & Means, G. C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York: Macmillan, 1932, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A. J., T. Capps, D. Cooper, P. Ferguson, T. Hopper, and E. A. Lowe, ‘Management Control in an Area of the NCB: Rationales of Accounting Practices in a Public Enterprise’, Accounting Organizations and Society (1985) pp. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, P. H., The Managerial Revolution Reassessed (Massachusetts: Lexington, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, S., C. Clubb, A. Hopwood, J. Hughes, and J. Nahapiet, ‘The Roles of Accounting in Organisations and Society’, Accounting Organizations and Society (1980) pp. 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J. M., ‘The Problem of Control in Large American Corporations’, Anti-Trust Bulletin (1969), pp. 163–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., ‘Managerial Strategies, New Technology and the Labour Process’, in D. Knights, H. Wilmott and D. Collinson (eds), Job Redesign: Critical Perspectives on the Labour Process (Aldershot: Gower Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. S., Modern Social Theory (London: Heinemann, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Economic Development, Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations (New York: CED, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. J. and M. J. Sherer, ‘The Value of Corporate Accounting Reports: Arguments for a Political Economy of Accounting’, Accounting Organizations and Society (1984) pp. 207–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curwen, P. J., Managerial Economics (London: Macmillan, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vroey, M., ‘The Owners’ Interventions in Decision-Making in Large Corporations’, European Economic Review (1975a) pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vroey, M., ‘The Separation of Ownership and Control in Large Corporations’, Review of Radical Political Economics (Summer, 1975b), pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierkes, M. and A. A. Bauer (eds), Corporate Social Accounting (New York: Praeger, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, R., Corporate Social Accounting (New York: Wiley 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, R. & Oppenheimer, M., ‘Who Rules the Corporations?’ Socialist Revolution (Volume 1, Nos 4, 5, 6; 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, D., The Impact of Change on the Accounting Profession (Edinburgh: ICA Scotland, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, A., ‘Families, Firms and Finance Capital: The Development of UK Industrial Firms with Particular Reference to their Ownership and Control’, Sociology (1980) pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K., The New Industrial State (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambling, T., Societal Accounting (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambling, T., Beyond the Conventions of Accounting (London: Macmillan, 1978).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glautier, M. W. E. and B. Underdown Accounting in a Changing Environment (London: Pitman, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., D. Owen and K. Maunders, ‘Corporate Social Reporting: the Way Forward’, Accountancy, (December 1986) pp. 108–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, A. and C. R. Hinings, ‘Role Relations and Value Adaptation: A Study of the Professional Accountant in Industry’, Sociology (1970) pp. 353–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, J., ‘The Role of the Board’, Director (October 1976) pp. 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, T., J. Storey and H. Willmott ‘Accounting for Accounting: Towards the Development of a Dialectical View’, Accounting, Organization and Society (1987) pp. 437–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. C., ‘Corporate Social Accounting: the Gulf Between Theory and Practice’, Occasional Papers in Sociology, No 3 (Bristol Polytechnic, Department of Economics and Social Science, April 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D. and D. Collinson, ‘Disciplining the Shopfloor: A Comparison of the Disciplinary Effects of Managerial Psychology and Financial Accounting’, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1987) pp. 457–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. and H. Newby, The Problem of Sociology: An Introduction to the Discipline (London: Hutchinson, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Loft, A., ‘Towards a Critical Understanding of Accounting: the Case of Cost Accounting in the UK, 1914–1925’, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1986) pp. 137–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, C. and C. Wilson, (1959) ‘The Social Background and Connections of “Top Decision Makers”’ in J. Urry and J. Wakeford (eds) Power in Britain (London: Heinemann, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlin, J. T., ‘Accounting for Pollution’, Journal of Accountancy (1973) pp. 41–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, R., The Economic Theory of ‘Managerial Capitalism’ (London: Macmillan, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, R. ‘Why Economics Needs a Theory of the Firm’, Economic Journal (March 1972, special issue) pp. 321–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maunders, K. T., ‘Employee Reporting’, in T. A. Lee (ed.) Developments in Financial Reporting (Oxford: Philip Allen, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Melrose-Woodman, J. and I. Kverndal, ‘Towards Social Responsibility: Company Codes and Ethics of Practice’, Management Survey, No 28 (London: British Institute of Management, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A., ‘NCB Lesson for the Profession’, Account (7 November 1985) p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsen, R. J., ‘Is Social Accounting a Mirage?’ in M. Dierkes and A. A. Bauer (eds), Corporate Social Accounting (New York: Praeger, 1973) pp. 107–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, T., Ownership, Control and Ideology (London: Allen & Unwin, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, T. and H. Beynon, Living with Capitalism (London: Routledge, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyman, S. and Silberston, A., ‘The Ownership and Control of Industry’, Oxford Economic Papers (New Series) (1978) pp. 74–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D., ‘Why Accountants Can’t Afford to Turn Their Backs on Social Reporting’, Accountancy (January 1981) pp. 44–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D., ‘Social Accountability: A Role for Accountants’, Accountants Record (July 1982) pp. 4–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. D., ‘Polemical Themes in Social Accounting: A Scenario for Standard Setting’, Advances in Public Interest Accountancy (1986) pp. 67–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perks, R. W. and R. H. Gray, ‘Beware of Social Accounting’, Management Accounting (December 1979) pp. 22–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perks, R. W. and R. H. Gray, ‘What is Social Accounting?’ Management Accounting (July–August 1981) p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C., Organisational Analysis (London: Tavistock, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C., Complex Organisations (Brighton: Scott Foresman, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., Power in Organisations (London: Pitman, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Puxty, A. G., ‘Social Accounting as Immanent Legitimation: A Critique of Technicist Ideology’, Advances in Public Interest Accounting (1986) pp. 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, K. V., ‘Toward a Theory of Social Accounting’, The Accounting Review (1976) pp. 516–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, T. and J. Hyman, ‘Forms of Ownership and Control: Decision-Making Within a Financial Institution’, Sociology (1984) pp. 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J., Corporations, Classes and Capitalism (London: Hutchinson, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J., The Upper Classes: Property and Privilege in Britain (London: Macmillan, 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J., ‘The Debate on Ownership and Control’, Social Studies Review (1986) pp. 24–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shocker, A. D. and S. P. Sethi, ‘An Approach to Incorporating Social References in Developing Corporate Action Strategies’, in S. P. Sethi (ed.), The Unstable Ground: Corporate Social Policy in a Dynamic Society (Los Angeles: Melville, 1974) pp. 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1959) ‘Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioural Science’, American Economic Review (1974) pp. 253–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanworth, P. and A. C. Giddens, ‘The Modern Corporate Economy’, Sociological Review (1975) pp. 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G., ‘The Firm as a “Dispersed” Social Agency’, Economy and Society (1982) pp. 233–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinker, A. M., Paper Prophets: a Social Critique of Accounting (Eastbourne: Holt Rinehart and Winston, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westergaard, J. and H. R. Resler Class in a Capitalist Society: A Study of Contemporary Britain (London: Heinemann, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. H., ‘Profit, Growth and Sales Maximisation’, Economica (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, M., ‘Corporate Ownership and Control’, American Journal of Sociology (1974) pp. 1073–1119.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 David J. Cooper & Trevor M. Hopper

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, T.C. (1990). Corporate Social Accounting and the Capitalist Enterprise. In: Cooper, D.J., Hopper, T.M. (eds) Critical Accounts. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09786-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics