Skip to main content

The Kronstadt Revolt and the New Economic Policy

  • Chapter
The Origin of the Communist Autocracy
  • 38 Accesses

Abstract

The wave of strikes and workers’ demonstrations in Petrograd at the end of February 1921 and the revolt of the population and sailors of the naval base of Kronstadt against the dictatorship of the communist party have been much distorted in the telling by many Soviet, and some other historians. Most of them labour to demonstrate, with scant regard for the facts, that these events were inspired and directed from outside Russia by enemies of the Soviet state. The allegation is unsupported by evidence, and has been rejected by every serious historian of the period. The opponents of Trotsky—and their number naturally increased after his fall in 1927—strive to show that in Petrograd, where Zinoviev was in control of the party organization, order was much more easily restored and the threat much less serious than in Kronstadt, where, so far as the fleet was concerned, the party organization was subordinated to the military machine, and therefore to Trotsky. Trotsky and his supporters, on the other hand, are concerned to establish that the sailors’ revolt was only possible in 1921 because of the change in their social origins as compared with 1917. Although there appears to be some truth in each of these contentions, neither of them gives by any means the whole explanation of events which were due to much more complex causes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See A. S. Pukhov, ‘V Petrograde nakanune kronshtadtskogo vosstaniya v 1921 g.’ in Krasnaya letopis’, no. 4 (37), 1930, pp. 107 ff., for these resolutions, quoted from the archives of the Petrograd communist party.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See P. Bogomil, ‘Pis’mo iz Rossii’, in Zarya, 1922, pp. 21–5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. S. Pukhov, ‘Kronshtadt i baltiyskiy flot pered myatezhem’, Krasnaya letopis’, no. 6 (39), 1930, at pp. 188–9. (And see Chapter XIV.)

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. S. Pukhov, ‘V Petrograde nakanune kronshtadtskogo myatezha’, ibid., no. 4 (37), 1930, at pp. 117–18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The most recent example of this type of assertion is to be found in A. Rothstein, A History of the U.S.S.R., London, 1950, p. 145. ‘The leaders of the rebellion did not come out openly for capitalist restoration. … But the true significance of the rising was well understood abroad.’

    Google Scholar 

  6. According to Trotsky’s view, as quoted by Smilga, 30 per cent actively anti-communist, 40 per cent neutral, 30 per cent pro-communist—see Protokoly X, p. 225; and see A. S. Pukhov, in ‘Kronshtadt vo vlasti vragov revolyutsii’, Krasnaya letopis’, no. 1 (40), 1931, pp. 5–80, and Kornatovsky, pp. 13–15, on communist support for the revolt.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuznetsov, pp. 75–6, admits that the soldiers were driven into battle at the point of the revolver, but says this was due to their fear of going onto the ice. There is no doubt that there was a certain amount of unrest among the armed forces on the mainland inspired by the sailors’ revolt. The seamen of the Naval Aviation Detachment at Oranienbaum voted in support of the Petropavlovsk resolution on 3 March. Although they did not take up arms against the government, forty-five were executed—see P. E. Dybenko, Iz nedr tsarskogo flota k velikomu oktyabryu, Moscow, 1928, pp. 199–200, quoted in Fedotoff-White, p. 156. For other instances of army unrest see Fedotoff-White, pp. 153–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See two articles by him in Byulleten’ oppozitsii, ‘Shumikha vokrug Kronshtadta’, nos. 66–7 (1938), pp. 22–6; and ‘Eshche ob usmirenii Kronshtadta’, no. 70 (1938), pp. 10 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. E. Rabinovich, ‘Delegaty 10-go syezda RKP(b) pod Kronshtadtom v 1921 godu’ in Krasnaya letopis’, no. 2 (41), 1931, p. 32. According to this author, who was well informed on army questions, it was ‘solely’ this information which brought a ‘radical change in the mood of the Red Army men’.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1977 Leonard Schapiro

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schapiro, L. (1977). The Kronstadt Revolt and the New Economic Policy. In: The Origin of the Communist Autocracy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09509-4_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics