Skip to main content
  • 17 Accesses

Abstract

Among the numerous paradoxes characteristic of Byron’s personality, of his work and posthumous reputation, scholars have long pointed out the conspicuous difference between his significance in England and his stature in other European countries as well as in America. Britain’s attitude was, after a few years of extravagant admiration, generally hostile, to be succeeded only at the close of the century by serious study which, however, resulted in only a very moderate appreciation of his poetic gift. Continental Europe and America were far more constant in their high regard for the poet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. M. P. Alekseyev, “Avtografy Bayrona v SSRR”, Literaturnoe Nasledstvo (Moscow, 1952) vol. 58, pp. 975–6. This study also includes information that Russian interest in Byron lasted well up to the middle of the nineteenth century, when the poet’s manuscripts were collected by his admirers. Some of Byron’s autographs derived from Russian collections (a rough copy of the Hebrew Melody “A Spirit Stood Before Me”, a letter addressed to Mr Trevannion dated Milan, 15 October 1816) were here published for the first time. The authenticity of these autographs was questioned in the English press (The Times, 15 July 1955, and 8, 9,19 May 1958) but then established beyond the shadow of a doubt.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Byron’s letter to Trevannion was reproduced by Sir Gavin de Beer (The Times Literary Supplement, 16 May 1958), who used the autograph preserved by the Public Library of Leningrad but unfortunately did not refer to its previous publication by Professor Alekseyev.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yu. D. Levin, “Prižiznennaya slava Valtera Skotta v Rossii”, Epoha romantizma, Leningrad, 1975, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. N. Veselovsky, V. A. Zukovsky, Poesiya čuvstva i “serdečnogo voobraženiya” (Petrograd, 1918) pp. 297–303;

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. I. Maslov, Načal’ny period bayronizma v Rossii (Kiev, 1915) pp. 4–5, 21–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Russkayas tarina, 1896, no. 10, pp. 135–38. Cf. Yu. G. Oksman, “Bor’bas Bayronom v aleksandrovskuyu e pohu” in Načala, 1922, no. 2, pp. 256–63.

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. P. Daškevič, Stat’ i po novoy russkoy literature (Petrograd, 1914) pp. 330–97;

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. K. Kozmin, Pushkin o Bayrone — Puškin v mirovoy literature (Leningrad, 1926) pp. 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. I. Gillelson, P. A. Vyazemsky: Žizn’ i tvorčestvo (Life and Work) (Leningrad, 1969) pp. 43–6, 158–64.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See V. I. Maslov, Literaturnaya deyatel’ nost’ K. F. Ryleeva (Kiev, 1912).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. A. Bobrov, O bayronizme A. I. Poležaeva (Varšava, 1906);

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. Eyges, K perevodam I. Kozlova iz Bayrona — “Zven’ya”, Book 5 (Moscow and Leningrad, 1935) pp. 744–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moskovsky Telegraf, 1828, no. 20, p. 461; N. Polevoy, Očerki russkoy literatury (Moscow, 1839) no. 1. p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Diakonova, “Iz nablyudeniy nad žurnalom Pečorina”, Russkaya literatura, 1969, no. 4, pp. 115–16.

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. Brodsky, “Bayron v russkoy literature”, Literaturny kritik, 1938, no. 4, pp. 134–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1981 Paul Graham Trueblood

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Diakonova, N., Vacuro, V. (1981). Byron and Russia. In: Trueblood, P.G. (eds) Byron’s Political and Cultural Influence in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05588-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics