Abstract
The role of the press can change from election to election, sometimes because the structure and ownership of the press has changed, and sometimes because events call forth a different response. In 1979 the partisanship of the popular dailies was cruder than usual, while the quality papers did not have The Times to counter-balance, to borrow from or to criticise. The nature of the argument and the style of the campaign gave journalists little to get their teeth into — yet the parties were attacked for reducing the contest to a ‘media event’.
The authors are indebted to Deirdre Saunder for her help in preparing the tables.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For an analysis of the dispute see S. Jenkins, ‘The Vanishing of The Times’, Encounter, (August, 1979).
Copyright information
© 1980 David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bilton, M., Himelfarb, S. (1980). Fleet Street. In: The British General Election of 1979. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04755-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04755-0_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-04757-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-04755-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)