Skip to main content

Abstract

The role of the press can change from election to election, sometimes because the structure and ownership of the press has changed, and sometimes because events call forth a different response. In 1979 the partisanship of the popular dailies was cruder than usual, while the quality papers did not have The Times to counter-balance, to borrow from or to criticise. The nature of the argument and the style of the campaign gave journalists little to get their teeth into — yet the parties were attacked for reducing the contest to a ‘media event’.

The authors are indebted to Deirdre Saunder for her help in preparing the tables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For an analysis of the dispute see S. Jenkins, ‘The Vanishing of The Times’, Encounter, (August, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1980 David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bilton, M., Himelfarb, S. (1980). Fleet Street. In: The British General Election of 1979. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04755-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics