Skip to main content

Abstract

This study is concerned with the collective exercise of coercion by economic means and particularly with the recourse to international economic sanctions. The subject is one of considerable and continuing interest: United Nations sanctions against Rhodesia (renamed Zimbabwe-Rhodesia in 1979) have been in force since 1966; an arms embargo was imposed on South Africa in 1977; the Arab oil-producing countries made dramatic use of the ‘oil weapon’ in 1973; Cuba was subjected to OAS sanctions for over a decade. When are economic sanctions justified? Can they work? What costs do they carry? These are some of the questions this book seeks to answer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter 1

  1. See Robert Engler, The Politics of Oil (Chicago, 1961);

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peter Odell, Oil and World Power (1970);

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Chubin and Z. Sepehr, The Foreign Relations of Iran (Berkeley, 1974);

    Google Scholar 

  4. US Senate, Committee on Foreign Relations, Subcommittee on Multinational Corporations, Hearings on Multinational Corporations and United States Foreign Policy, Parts I and II, 93rd Congress, 1st Session, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See D. W. Bowett, ‘Economic Coercion and Reprisals by States’, The Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 13, 1, 1972, pp. 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. See too R. Higgins, ‘The Advisory Opinion on Namibia: which Resolutions are Binding under Article 25 of the Charter?’ International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. XXI (1972), pp. 270–86;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. O. Y. Asamoah, The Legal Significance of the Declarations of the General Assembly (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  8. But GATT emphasises reciprocity, not enforcement, and sanctions are given a very limited place in the agreement. See K. Dam, The GATT: Law and International Economic Organization (Chicago, 1970), particularly pp. 352–64.

    Google Scholar 

  9. UN pressure on the World Bank to deny loan facilities to South Africa has been resisted. See S. A. Bleicher, ‘UN v. IBRD: A Dilemma of Functionalism’, International Organization, Vol. XXIV (1970), pp. 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. See below Chapter 2. See too R. B. Lillich, ‘Economic Coercion and the International Legal Order’, International Affairs, Vol. 51, 3 (1975), pp. 358–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1980 Royal Institute of International Affairs

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doxey, M.P. (1980). The Scope of the Inquiry. In: Economic Sanctions and International Enforcement. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04335-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics