Skip to main content

Ringing and related durable methods of marking birds

  • Chapter
Animal Marking
  • 73 Accesses

Abstract

Of all the methods of marking birds, the close ring is certainly the most ubiquitous in Britain and Ireland. Its use, however, is almost entirely confined to birds reared in captivity. The chief reason for this is that the close ring has to be passed up over the part-grown foot to its final position on the tarsus and this operation has to be carried out before the bird, if it is a passerine, is six or seven days old at the latest. The reason for this early ringing is that a ring which will pass over a fully grown foot can equally well come off again or, what is far worse, may slip down sufficiently to trap the toes without actually coming off, thus rendering the foot useless.

Robert Spencer is a Senior Research Officer in the Ringing and Migration Section of the British Trust for Ornithology. He has administered the British Bird Ringing Scheme since 1954 and is General Secretary of the European Union for Bird Ringing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Coulson, J.C. (1963). Improved colour-rings. Bird Study, 10, 109–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, J.C. and White, E. (1955). Abrasion and loss of rings among sea birds. Bird Study, 2, 41–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, J.C. (1976). An evaluation of the reliability of rings used on Herring and Lesser Black-backed Gulls. Bird Study, 23, 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorst, J. (1962). The Migrations of Birds. Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M.P. (1964). Ring loss and wear of rings on marked Manx Shearwaters. Bird Study, 11, 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec, J.A. (1975). Recovery rates and loss of aluminium, titanium and Incoloy bands on Herring Gulls. Bird-Banding, 46, 230–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockley, R.M. and Russell, P. (1953). Bird Ringing: the Art of Bird Study by Individual Marking. Crosby Lockwood, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, C.J. (1974), Bird Ringing. B.T.O. Guide No. 16, 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrion, W.R. and Shamis, J.D. (1977). An annotated bibliography of bird marking techniques. Bird-Banding, 48, 42–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulding, R.H. (1954). Loss of rings by marked Herring Gulls. Bird Study, 1, 37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydzewski, W. (1951). A historical review of bird marking. Dansk Orn. Foren. Tidsskr., 45, 61–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales, D.I. (1973). A ring address experiment. Bird Study 20, 313–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.J.M. (1966). Colour marking of Sandwich Terns. Seabird Group Bull., 2, 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, R. (1959). Progress and prospects in ringing. Ibis, 101, 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, R. (1970). The role of bird ringing in conservation. Bird Study, 17, 104–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1978 The Contributors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spencer, R. (1978). Ringing and related durable methods of marking birds. In: Stonehouse, B. (eds) Animal Marking. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03711-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics