Abstract
Gallipoli has played a critical role in the formation of national identity, and remains a significant part of contemporary identities for both Turkey and Australia.1 This chapter explores the ways in which the development of a racialised or ethno-culturally bound modernity in Australia and Turkey has followed a similar path, notwithstanding the very great differences in the histories of the countries, their political geographies, and their contemporary challenges. However real and important such differences may be, the struggle to create a state that can encompass diversity while claiming singularity offers a shared contradiction. As Bacek Ince has observed in her study of Turkey’s struggle with citizenship and identity, the formation of a fully republican citizenship requires the assertion of ‘constitutional patriotism’, where membership of the nation and full participation can accommodate cultural and linguistic pluralism.2 The challenges for Australia are not dissimilar.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Nicholas Toscano (2009) ‘Gallipoli Diggers and the “Forgotten” Holocaust’, Eureka Street, 19 (7), 17;
Brad West (2008) ‘Enchanting Pasts: The Role of International Civil Religious Pilgrimage in Reimagining National Collective Memory’, Sociological Theory, 26 (3), 258–70;
Brad West (2010a) ‘Dialogical Memorialization, International Travel and the Public Sphere: A Cultural Sociology of Commemoration and Tourism at the First World War Gallipoli Battlefields’, Tourist Studies, 10 (3), 209–25;
Brad West (2010b) ‘Turkish Memorialization at Gallipoli: Rethinking the Commemoration/Tourism Nexus’, School of Sociology, Politic and International Studies, University of Bristol, Working Paper 04–10, www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/spais/migrated/documents/west0410.pdf, accessed 12 November 2014; Rachel Woodlock (2011) ‘Being an Aussie Mossie: Muslim and Australian Identity Among Australian-born Muslims’, Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 22 (4), 391–407; and Bart Ziino (2006) ‘Who Owns Gallipoli? Australia’s Gallipoli Anxieties 1915–2005’, Journal of Australian Studies, 30 (88), 1–12.
Bacek Ince (2012) Citizenship and Identity in Turkey: From Atatürk’s Republic to the Present Day (London: I.B. Tauris), 20.
Geoffrey Robertson (2014) An Inconvenient Genocide: Who Now Remembers the Armenians? (Sydney: Random House), 46ff.
Aysel Morin and Ronald Lee (2010) ‘Constitutive Discourse of Turkish Nationalism: Atatürk’s Nutuk and the Rhetorical Construction of the “Turkish People”’, Communication Studies, 61 (5), 486.
Marilyn Lake (2005) ‘The White Australia Policy’, in Ann Curthoys and Marilyn Lake (eds), Connected Worlds: History in Transnational Perspective (Canberra: ANU E-Press), http://press.anu.edu.au/cw/mobile_devices/chl3s05.html, accessed 3 August 2014.
Warwick Anderson (2002) The Cultivation of Whiteness: Science, Health and Racial Destiny in Australia (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press).
Pankaj Mishra (2012) From the Ruins of Empire: The Revolt Against the West and the Remaking of Asia (London: Allen Lane).
We merely sketch the debate here. For an indication see Vahagn Avedian (2012) ‘State Identity, Continuity, and Responsibility: The Ottoman Empire, the Republic of Turkey and the Armenian Genocide’, European Journal of International Law, 23 (3), 797–820, arguing the case for the genocide, and
Guenter Lewy (2005) The Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press), disputing the case. While there is agreement on the large-scale loss of life, the disputation is over intent, responsibility and contemporary consequences, and whether the events meet the definition of genocide as discussed by Robertson, An Inconvenient Genocide.
Benedict Anderson (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso).
Robin Gerster and Peter Pierce (eds) (2004) On the War Path: An Anthology of Australian Military Travel (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press).
Ernest Scott (1916/2002) A Short History of Australia (A Project Gutenberg of Australia e-book), http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200471.txt, accessed 23 November 2014.
Erik Jan Zürcher (1996) ‘Between Death and Desertion: The Experience of the Ottoman Soldier in World War I’, Turcica, 28, 235–58;
Edward J. Erickson (2001) Order to Die: A History of the Ottoman Army in the First World War (Westport: Greenwood Press);
Nora Fisher Onar (2009) ‘Echoes of a Universalism Lost: Rival Representations of the Ottomans in Today’s Turkey’, Middle Eastern Studies, 45 (2), 229–41.
Ahmet İçduygu, Sule Toktas and B. Ali Soner (2007) ‘The Politics of Population in a Nation-Building Process: Emigration of non-Muslims from Turkey’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31 (2), 358–89.
Although in 1839 a system of conscription was introduced in the Ottoman military through the Gulhane proclamation, and in July 1909 the military service law made it compulsory for all Ottoman subjects to serve, non-Muslim Ottoman citizens in the grey climate of early twentieth century were reluctant to serve in the army. In the classical Ottoman system, non-Muslims were exempted from serving based on a tax system. The leaders of the Greek, Assyrian, Armenian, and Bulgarian communities agreed to the military service on paper, but non-Muslims never actively participated in conscription. For the details see Erik Jan Zürcher (1998) ‘The Ottoman Conscription System, 1844–1914’, International Review of Social History, 43 (3), 437–49.
Ahmet İçduygu, Yılmaz Çolak and Nalan Soyarik (1999) ‘What is the Matter with Citizenship? A Turkish Debate’, Middle Eastern Studies, 35 (4), 187–208.
Ryan Gingeras (2009) Sorrowful Shores: Violence, Ethnicity and the End of the Ottoman Empire 1912–1923 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Feroz Ahmad (1993) The Making of Modern Turkey (London: Routledge).
Kemal Kirişçi (2000) ‘Disaggregating Turkish Citizenship and Immigration Practices’, Middle Eastern Studies, 36 (3), 1–22.
Rifat N. Bali (2000) Cumhuriyet Yıllarında Türkiye’de Yahudileri: Bir Türkleştirme Serüveni (1923–1945) [The Jews of the Republican Turkey: A Venture of Turkification] (Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları).
Soner Çağaptay (2002) ‘Kemalist dönemde göç ve iskan politikaları: Türk kimliği üzerine bir çalışma’ [Policies of Migration and Settlement in the Kemalist Era: A Study on Turkish Identity], Toplum ve Bilim, 93, 218–41.
Ayhan Aktar (2000) Varlık Vergisi ve Türkleştirme Politikaları [Capital Tax and Turkification Policies] (Istanbul: Iletişim Yayınları).
Kemal Kirişçi and Gareth M. Winrow (1997) The Kurdish Question and Turkey: An Example of a Trans-Elite Ethnic Conflict (London: Frank Cass).
Neville Meaney (2001) ‘Britishness and Australian Identity: The Problem of Nationalism in Australian History and Historiography’, Australian Historical Studies, 32(116), 76–90.
Alastair Kennedy (2012) ‘Outwitting Billy Hughes and the White Australia Policy: Chinese-Australians and the First World War’, Sabretache, 53 (4), 15.
Heidi Zogbaum (2004) Kisch in Australia — The Untold Story (Melbourne: Scribe).
Antonia Finnane (1999) Far from Where? Jewish Journeys from Shanghai to Australia (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press).
See Mark Hearn (2007) ‘Cultivating an Australian Sentiment: John Christian Watson’s Narrative of White Nationalism’, National Identities, 9 (4), 351–68;
Mark Hearn (2013) ‘Bound with the Empire: Narratives of Race, Nation, and Empire in the Australian Labor Party’s Defence Policy, 1901–21’, War & Society, 32 (2), 95–115; and
Neville Meaney (1995) ‘The End of “White Australia” and Australia’s Changing Perceptions of Asia, 1945–1990’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 49 (2), 171–89.
Gwenda Tavan (2005) The Long Slow Death of White Australia (Melbourne: Scribe).
İçduygu et al., What Is the Matter with Citizenship?’; and Fuat Keyman and Ahmet İçduygu (eds) (2005) Citizenship in a Global World: European Questions and Turkish Experiences (London: Routledge).
See Nimet Beriker-Atiyas (1997) ‘The Kurdish Conflict in Turkey: Issues, Parties and Prospects’, Security Dialogue, 28 (4), 439–52.
Hakan Yavuz (1996) ‘Turkey’s Imagined Enemies: Kurds and Islamists’, The World Today, 52 (4) (April), 99–101.
For a review of many of the key background and implementation issues in Australian multiculturalism, see Andrew Jakubowicz and Chris Ho (eds) (2013) ‘For Those Who’ve Come Across the Seas …’: Australian Multicultural Theory Policy and Practice (Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing).
John Pasquerelli (1998) The Pauline Hanson Story by the Man Who Knows (Sydney: New Holland Publishers).
Andrew Jakubowicz (2012) ‘Racism, Anti-Racism and Australian Social Research: A Case-Study in Recovering Socially-Useful Knowledge’, http://andrewjakubowicz.com/publications/antiracisml998, accessed 28 November 2014.
Michâlis S. Michael (2009) ‘Australia’s Handling of Tensions between Islam and the West under the Howard Government’, Asian Journal of Political Science, 17 (1), 45–70.
Andrew Jakubowicz (2011) ‘Chinese Walls: Australian Multiculturalism and the Necessity for Human Rights’, Journal of Intercultural Studies, 32 (6), 691–706.
Maria Vamvakinou (Chair) (2013) Inquiry into Migration and Multiculturalism in Australia, Joint Standing Committee on Migration, Parliament of Australia (Canberra: March).
See Claudia Bell (2013) ‘Pacifists and Partygoers? Young Antipodeans Visiting Gallipoli War Sites’, in Irena Ateljevic, Nigel Morgan and Annette Pritchard (eds), The Critical Turn in Tourism Studies: Creating an Academy of Hope (London: Routledge), 179;
Mervyn F. Bendle (2009) ‘Gallipoli: Second Front in the History Wars’, Quadrant, 53 (6), 6;
Frank Bongiorno and Grant Mansfield (2008) Whose War Was It Anyway? Some Australian Historians and the Great War’, History Compass, 6 (1), 62–90;
Gerhard Fischer (2012) ‘The Governor-General’s Apology: Reflections on Anzac Day’, Cultural Studies Review, 18 (3), 220–39;
Peter Fitzsimons (2014) Gallipoli (Sydney: Random House);
Marek Haltof (1993) ‘In Quest of Self-Identity: Gallipoli, Mateship, and the Construction of Australian National Identity’, Journal of Popular Film and Television, 21 (1), 27–36;
Peter H. Hoffenberg (2001) ‘Landscape, Memory and the Australian War Experience, 1915–18’, Journal of Contemporary History, 36 (1), 111–31;
Leonie Lockstone-Binney, John Hall and Lutfi Atay (2013) ‘Exploring the Conceptual Boundaries of Diaspora and Battlefield Tourism: Australians’ Travel to the Gallipoli Battlefield, Turkey, as a Case Study’, Tourism Analysis, 18 (3), 297–311;
Matt McDonald (2010) ‘“Lest We Forget”: The Politics of Memory and Australian Military Intervention’, International Political Sociology, 4 (3), 287–302;
Mark McKenna and Stuart Ward (2007) ‘“It Was Really Moving, Mate”: The Gallipoli Pilgrimage and Sentimental Nationalism in Australia’, Australian Historical Studies, 38 (129), 141–51;
Hank Nelson (1997) ‘Gallipoli, Kokoda and the Making of National Identity’, Journal of Australian Studies, 21 (53), 157–69;
Nick Osbaldiston and Theresa Petray (2011) ‘The Role of Horror and Dread in the Sacred Experience’, Tourist Studies, 11 (2), 175–90;
Lynette Russell (2012) ‘Remembering Places Never Visited: Connections and Context in Imagined and Imaginary Landscapes’, Journal of Historical Archaeology, 16 (2), 401–17.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Andrew Jakubowicz and Ahmet İçduygu
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jakubowicz, A., İçduygu, A. (2015). After Gallipoli: Empire, Nation and Diversity in Multicultural Turkey and Australia. In: Michael, M.S. (eds) Reconciling Cultural and Political Identities in a Globalized World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-49315-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-49315-6_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57075-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49315-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)