Skip to main content

The Rise of Hindu Nationalism and the Marginalisation of Muslims in India Today

  • Chapter
The Post-Colonial States of South Asia

Abstract

India, the ‘largest democracy of the world’ has also been known after 1947 for its attempts at establishing a secular regime and its success — quite exceptional — in maintaining it for decades despite ups and downs. Even though Indira Gandhi had the notion of secularism inserted in the Indian Constitution in 1976, almost twenty years after independence, the political system set up during the reign of her father, Jawaharlal Nehru, was already designed along those lines. Secularism has been understood in India not as a synonym for the French word laïcité, which implies separation between church and state; rather, it designates the equidistance of the state vis-à-vis all religions and an equally positive attitude towards them all. For instance, Article 25 of the constitution emphasizes that ‘all persons are equally free to profess, practice and propagate religion’, and Article 30 states that ‘All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions’, which can also receive subsidies from the state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. On these historical developments which cannot be covered in the scope of this chapter, see P. Brass, Language, Religion and Politics in North India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974); L.S. Freitag, Collective Action and Community: Public Arenas and the Emergence of Communalism in North India (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1990); and G. Pandey, The Construction of Communalism in Colonial North India (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. von Stienencron, ‘Hinduism: On the Proper Use of a Deceptive Term’, in G.D. Sontheimer and H. Kulke, eds, Hinduism Reconsidered (New Delhi: Manohar, 1989), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Thapar, ‘Syndicated Moksha’, Seminar, September 1985, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Minault, The Khilafat Movment: Religious Symbolism and Political Mobilization in India (New York: Columbia University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.S. Golwakar, We, or Our Nationhood Defined (Nagpur: Bharat Prakashan, 1939).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Jaffrelot, ‘The Idea of the Hindu Race in the Writings of Hindu Nationalist Ideologues in the 1920s and the 1930s: A Concept Between Two Cultures’, in P. Robb, ed., The Concept of Race in South Asia (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.S. Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts (Bangalore: Jagaran Prakashan, 1966), 62.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Romila Thapar explains that this exclusion is not based on a racial criterion; it is social and ritual and hence can be overcome via acculturation and recognition of the superiority of the Brahmin: R. Thapar, Ancient Indian History (New Delhi: Orient Longman, 1978), 165, 169 and 179.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Barthval, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh: Ek Parichay (New Delhi: Suruchi Prakashan, 1998), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lok Sabha Debates, third session, col.8, no. 2, (New Delhi: Lok Sabha Secretariat, 1990), 633. For more details, see C. Jaffrelot, ‘Note sur un syndicat nationaliste hindou: le travail et les travailleurs dans l’idéologie et les stratégies du Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh’, in G. Heuzé, ed., Travailler en Inde, Purushartha, no. 14 (Paris: EHESS, 1992), 251–70. Today, the BMS has about 4.5 million members, Muslim India, no. 208, 20 April, 182.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For further details, see C. Jaffrelot, ‘The Vishva Hindu Parishad: Structures and Strategies’, in J. Haynes, ed., Religion, Globalisation and Political Culture in the Third World (London: Macmillan, 1999), 191–212.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Graham, ‘The Congress and Hindu Nationalism’, in D.A. Low, ed., The Indian National Congress (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1988), 174.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Hasan, ‘Adjustment and Accommodation: Indian Muslims after Partition’, Social Scientist 18(8–9), August–September, 1990, 52.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. Graff, ‘Aligarh’s Long Quest for “Minority” Status — AMU (Amendment) Act, 1981’, Economic and Political Weekly, 11 August 1990, 1771–81.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Chiriyankandath, ‘Tricolour and Saffron: Congress and the New Hindu Challenge’, in S.K. Mitra and J. Chiriyankandath, eds, Electoral Politics in India: A Changing Landscape (New Delhi: Segment Books, 1992), 69.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Hasan, Legacy of a Divided Nation: India’s Muslims since Independence (London: Hurst, 1997), 294.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Hasan, ‘In Search of Integration and Identity: Indian Muslims since Independence’, Economic and Political Weekly, November 1988, 2470.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2001 Amita Shastri and A. Jeyaratnam Wilson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jaffrelot, C. (2001). The Rise of Hindu Nationalism and the Marginalisation of Muslims in India Today. In: Shastri, A., Wilson, A.J. (eds) The Post-Colonial States of South Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-11508-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics