Abstract
In this chapter I want to argue that:
-
[i]
A necessary feature of any just peace, particularly in post-civil war situations, is that it is a durable one.
-
[ii]
A particularly significant factor contributing to the durability of a peace settlement is that key publics, communities and opinion leaders believe that the peace is sufficiently ‘just’ as to merit their commitment.
-
[iii]
A necessary element in facilitating the belief that a peace is ‘just enough’ is that the socio-cultural scars left by the war are addressed in a manner such that the pains of the past cease to dominate the present and open up the possibility of future co-existence between former enemies.
-
[iv]
The manner in which such ‘memory’ or ‘forgiveness work’ is carried out will vary from case to case, depending on a number of significant factors, including the balance of power during the post-peace settlement period.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Andrew Rigby
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rigby, A. (2005). Forgiveness and Reconciliation in Jus Post Bellum. In: Evans, M. (eds) Just War Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10912-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10912-5_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-73594-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-10912-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)