Abstract
The definition of class according to the nature of the relations of production has traditionally centred on the distinction between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, a focus which has involved the identification of concepts which are in direct contradiction — the private ownership of the means of production by a privileged minority and the necessary sale of labour power by the majority. This situation is mirrored in the essentially antagonistic relationship normally existing between the two classes, which finds expression, at least in theory, in the ideologies of each class. Whilst the division between bourgeois and proletarian may be used as the foundation of class analysis, it does not take account of the complexities of class formation which may exist at any stage in the development (or, indeed, the overthrow) of capitalism. The dissolution of ‘pure’ ownership of the means of production into separate but closely related functions of possession and control (Wright, 1976, pp. 21–6) and the consequent existence of more complex technical relations of production (for example the functions of foremen, supervisors and managers) is evidence that there are some jobs- perhaps the majority in advanced industrial society — which combine within the individual, elements of both the classical bourgeois and proletarian roles in the production process. Additionally, there may be persons who are self-employed and who appear to lie outside the principal sphere of large-scale capitalism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Amin, Le développement inégal (Paris:. Maspero, 1973).
S. Barry, Le Royaume de Waalo: Le Sénégal avant le conquête (Paris: Maspero, 1972).
F. Bechhofer and B. Elliott, ‘Persistence and Change: the Petite Bourgeoisie in Industrial Society’, European Journal of Sociology, XVII (1976).
C. H. Birkbeck, ‘Self employed Proletarians in an Informal Factory: the Case of Cali’s Garbage Dump’, World Development, 6 (1978) 1173–86.
R. Cohen and D. Michael, ‘The Revolutionary Potential of the African Lumpenproletariat: a Sceptical View’, Bulletin of the Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, 5 (1973).
M. Diop, Histoire des classes sociales dans l’Afrique de l’ouest: le Sénégal (Paris: Maspero, 1972).
F. Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1967).
A. G. Frank, On Capitalist Underdevelopment (Bombay: Oxford University Press, 1975).
C. Gerry, ‘Petty Production and Capitalist Production in Dakar: the Crisis of the “Self-employed”’, World Development, 6 (1978) 1147–60.
D. C. Hodges, ‘The Anatomy of Exploitation’, Science and Society (1960).
International Labour Office, Towards Full Employment: A Programme for Colombia (Geneva: 1970).
International Labour Office, Employment, Incomes and Equality: A Strategy for Raising Productive Employment in Kenya (Geneva: 1972).
G. N. Kitching, ‘Modes of Production and Kenyan Dependency’, Review of African Political Economy, 8 (1977).
O. Lebrun and C. Gerry, ‘Petty Production and Capitalism’, Review of African Political Economy, 3 (1975).
K. Marx, Capital (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1970).
N. Poulantzas, ‘On Social Classes’, New Left Review, 78 (1973).
N. Poulantzas, ‘The New Petty Bourgeoisie’, in A. Hunt (ed.), Class and Class Structure (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1977).
D. G. Reynolds, ‘Economic Development With Surplus Labour: Some Complications’, Oxford Economic Papers, 21 (1969) 89–108.
A. Scott, ‘Notes on the Theoretical Status of PCP’ (University of Essex: mimeo, 1977).
A. Sfeir-Younis, ‘Institutional Arrangements and Economic Development: Access to the Solid Waste Economy’, World Bank, Urban and Regional Economics Division, 1977.
G. Williams and T. Mutebile, ‘Petty Commodity Production in Nigeria: a Note’, World Development (1978).
E. O. Wright, ‘Class Boundaries in Advanced Capitalist Societies’, New Left Review, 98 (1976).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1981 Frank Bechhofer and Brian Elliott
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gerry, C., Birkbeck, C. (1981). The Petty Commodity Producer in Third World Cities: Petit-Bourgeois or ‘Disguised’ Proletarian?. In: Bechhofer, F., Elliott, B. (eds) The Petite Bourgeoisie. Edinburgh Studies in Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10048-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10048-1_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-63703-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-10048-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)