Skip to main content

The First Steps on AOPs’ Concepts, Development, and Applications in Teratology

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Teratogenicity Testing

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2753))

  • 267 Accesses

Abstract

An Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) is an analytical model that describes, through a graphical representation, a linear sequence of biologically connected events at different levels of biological organization, causally leading to an adverse effect on human health or the environment. In general, AOPs are constructed based on five central principles: systematic development and review, chemical–agnostic, modular, networks, and living documents. Furthermore, AOPs have the potential to be used, for example, to investigate certain molecular targets; relate the regulation of specific genes or proteins among AOPs; extrapolate biological processes, pathways, or diseases from one species to another; and even predict adverse effects in particular populations. AOPs also emerge as an alternative to animal experimentation in studies of developmental malformations. It’s even possible now to develop a quantitative AOP to predict teratogenic effects for some substances. However, the construction of high-quality AOPs requires standardization in the way these models are developed and reviewed, ensuring an adequate degree of flexibility and guaranteeing efficiency. The development of AOPs should strictly be based on the guidance documents developed by the OECD. Nevertheless, an important step for those developing AOPs is the choice of an apical endpoint or an initiating molecular event in order to initiate the construction of the pathway. Another crucial step is a systematic literature review based on the random combination of the blocks of information. With these two fundamental steps completed, it only remains to follow the guidance documents on Developing and Assessing Adverse Outcome Pathways and AOP Developers’ Handbook supplement provided by the OECD to organize and construct an AOP. This modern approach will bring radical changes in the field of toxicity testing, regarding the prediction of apical toxic effects using molecular-level effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. OECD (2017) Revised guidance document on developing and assessing adverse outcome pathways. Ser Test Assess 184:1–32. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD)

    Google Scholar 

  2. OECD (2021) Draft guidance document for the scientific review of adverse outcome pathways. OECD Series on Adverse Outcome Pathways. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD)

    Google Scholar 

  3. OECD (2023) Adverse outcome pathways, molecular screening and toxicogenomics. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD)

    Google Scholar 

  4. AOP-Wiki (2023) Collaborative Adverse Outcome Pathway Wiki. https://aopwiki.org/info_pages/2/info_linked_pages/9

  5. EPA (2023) Adverse outcome pathway database (AOP-DB). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/healthresearch/adverse-outcome-pathway-database-aop-db

    Google Scholar 

  6. Korenaga TR, Crosland B, Tewari KS (2022) Cancer in pregnancy. DiSaia Creasman Clin Gynecol Oncol E-Book 25:345. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-77684-4.00021-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ujházy E, Mach M, Navarová J, Brucknerová I, Dubovický M (2012) Teratology–past, present and future. Interdiscip Toxicol 5(4):163–168. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10102-012-0027-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Panzica-Kelly JM, Zhang CX, Augustine-Rauch KA (2015) Optimization and performance assessment of the chorion-off [dechorinated] zebrafish developmental toxicity assay. Toxicol Sci 146(1):127–134. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfv076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Battistoni M, Di Renzo F, Menegola E, Bois FY (2019) Quantitative AOP based teratogenicity prediction for mixtures of azole fungicides. Comput Toxicol 11:72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2019.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Menegola E, Veltman CH, Battistoni M, Di Renzo F, Moretto A, Metruccio F et al (2021) An adverse outcome pathway on the disruption of retinoic acid metabolism leading to developmental craniofacial defects. Toxicology 458:152843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2021.152843

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krewski D, Andersen ME, Tyshenko MG, Krishnan K, Hartung T, Boekelheide K et al (2020) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: progress in the past decade and future perspectives. Arch Toxicol 94:1–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02613-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bottini AA, Hartung T (2009) Food for thought… on the economics of animal testing. ALTEX-Altern Anim Exp 26(1):3–16. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2009.1.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Busquet F, Hartung T (2017) The need for strategic development of safety sciences. Altern Anim Exp ALTEX 34(1):3–21. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1701031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baker M (2016) Reproducibility crisis. Nature 533(26):353–366. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeong J, Choi J (2018) Use of adverse outcome pathways in chemical toxicity testing: potential advantages and limitations. Environ Health Toxicol 33(1). https://doi.org/10.5620/eht.e2018002

  16. Gijbels E, Vilas-Boas V, Annaert P, Vanhaecke T, Devisscher L, Vinken M (2020) Robustness testing and optimization of an adverse outcome pathway on cholestatic liver injury. Arch Toxicol 94:1151–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02691-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Andersen ME, Al-Zoughool M, Croteau M, Westphal M, Krewski D (2010) The future of toxicity testing. J Toxicol Environ Health Part B 13(2–4):163–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2010.483933

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang Q, Bhattacharya S, Andersen ME, Conolly RB (2010) Computational systems biology and dose-response modeling in relation to new directions in toxicity testing. J Toxicol Environ Health Part B 13(2–4):253–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2010.483943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gibb S (2008) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. Reprod Toxicol 25(1):136–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.10.013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davi Farias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Vieira, L., Souza, T., Farias, D. (2024). The First Steps on AOPs’ Concepts, Development, and Applications in Teratology. In: Félix, L. (eds) Teratogenicity Testing. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2753. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3625-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3625-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3624-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3625-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics