Abstract
fMRI has gained popularity in research and clinical settings. The majority of work relies on group comparisons to identify the resting-state network structure, connectivity, and differences between diverse populations. However, the reliability of fMRI has been doubted together with an increasing number of publications on individual differences and other factors affecting the resting-state fMRI. The current publication addresses the factors that are often overlooked or not accounted for when selecting the “healthy control group” as a baseline for comparison. Our results indicate that additional biological factors, such as blood pressure, level of hemoglobin, waist circumference, time of image acquisition, as well as age and sex introduce variability in the group data. It is therefore likely to conclude that this variability on a group level might in turn affect the differences or changes observed between populations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adolphs R (2015) The unsolved problems of neuroscience. Trends Cogn Sci 19:173–175
Wang M-Y, Yuan Z (2021) EEG decoding of dynamic facial expressions of emotion: evidence from SSVEP and causal cortical network dynamics. Neuroscience 459:50–58
Biasiucci A, Franceschiello B, Murray MM (2019) Electroencephalography. Curr Biol 29:R80–R85
da Silva FL (2013) EEG and MEG: relevance to neuroscience. Neuron 80:1112–1128
Vaisvilaite L, Hushagen V, Grønli J, Specht K (2021) Time-of-day effects in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging: changes in effective connectivity and blood oxygenation level dependent signal. Brain Connect 12:515. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2021.0129
Kazimierczak K, Craven AR, Ersland L et al (2021) Combined fMRI region- and network-analysis reveal new insights of top-down modulation of bottom-up processes in auditory laterality. Front Behav Neurosci 15:802319
Laeng B, Flaaten CB, Walle KM et al (2021) “Mickey Mousing” in the brain: motion-sound synesthesia and the subcortical substrate of audio-visual integration. Front Hum Neurosci 15:605166
Poldrack RA, Farah MJ (2015) Progress and challenges in probing the human brain. Nature 526:371–379
Ogawa S, Tank DW, Menon R et al (1992) Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:5951–5955
Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Chesler DA et al (1992) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:5675–5679
Clark VP (2012) A history of randomized task designs in fMRI. NeuroImage 62:1190–1194
Liu TT (2012) The development of event-related fMRI designs. NeuroImage 62:1157–1162
Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyde JS (1995) Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med 34:537–541
Sharda M, Silani G, Specht K et al (2019) Music therapy for children with autism: investigating social behaviour through music. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 3:759–761
Smith SM, Fox PT, Miller KL et al (2009) Correspondence of the brain’s functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:13040–13045
Fox MD, Raichle ME (2007) Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:700–711
Damoiseaux JS, Rombouts SARB, Barkhof F et al (2006) Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:13848–13853
Raichle ME (2015) The brain’s default mode network. Annu Rev Neurosci 38:433–447
Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ et al (2001) A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:676–682
Uddin LQ (2015) Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nat Rev Neurosci 16:55–61
Seeley WW, Menon V, Schatzberg AF et al (2007) Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci 27:2349–2356
Noble S, Scheinost D, Constable RT (2019) A decade of test-retest reliability of functional connectivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. NeuroImage 203:116157
Bennett CM, Miller MB (2010) How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1191:133–155
Botvinik-Nezer R, Holzmeister F, Camerer CF et al (2020) Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams. Nature 582:84–88
Rosen BR, Savoy RL (2012) fMRI at 20: has it changed the world? NeuroImage 62:1316–1324
Specht K (2019) Current challenges in translational and clinical fMRI and future directions. Front Psych 10:924
Tian F, Wang J, Xu C et al (2018) Corrigendum: focusing on the differences of resting-state brain networks, using a data-driven approach to explore the functional neuroimaging characteristics of extraversion trait. Front Neurosci 12:380
Dubois J, Galdi P, Han Y et al (2018) Resting-state functional brain connectivity best predicts the personality dimension of openness to experience. Personal Neurosci 1:E6
Hjelmervik H, Hausmann M, Osnes B et al (2014) Resting states are resting traits--an FMRI study of sex differences and menstrual cycle effects in resting state cognitive control networks. PLoS One 9:e103492
Sie J-H, Chen Y-H, Shiau Y-H, Chu W-C (2019) Gender- and age-specific differences in resting-state functional connectivity of the central autonomic network in adulthood. Front Hum Neurosci 13:369
Baird A (2019) Sex in the brain: how seizures, strokes, dementia, tumors, and trauma can change your sex life. Columbia University Press, New York Chichester
Tooley UA, Mackey AP, Ciric R et al (2021) Erratum to: associations between neighborhood SES and functional brain network development. Cereb Cortex 31:2307
Bellucci G, Hahn T, Deshpande G, Krueger F (2019) Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 19:165–176
Cole DM, Smith SM, Beckmann CF (2010) Advances and pitfalls in the analysis and interpretation of resting-state FMRI data. Front Syst Neurosci 4:8
Dubois J, Adolphs R (2016) Building a science of individual differences from fMRI. Trends Cogn Sci 20:425–443
Sjuls GS, Specht K (2021) Why blood pressure and body mass should be controlled for in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.02.446721
Wen Z, Hammoud MZ, Scott JC et al (2021) Impact of exogenous estradiol on task-based and resting-state neural signature during and after fear extinction in healthy women. Neuropsychopharmacology 46:2278–2287
Zeidman P, Jafarian A, Corbin N et al (2019) A guide to group effective connectivity analysis, part 1: first level analysis with DCM for fMRI. NeuroImage 200:174–190
Friston KJ (2011) Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect 1:13–36
Nilsson L-G, Bäckman L, Erngrund K et al (1997) The Betula prospective cohort study: memory, health, and aging. Aging Neuropsychol Cognit 4:1–32
Salami A, Wåhlin A, Kaboodvand N et al (2016) Longitudinal evidence for dissociation of anterior and posterior MTL resting-state connectivity in aging: links to perfusion and memory. Cereb Cortex 26:3953–3963
Lanka P, Deshpande G (2019) Combining Prospective Acquisition CorrEction (PACE) with retrospective correction to reduce motion artifacts in resting state fMRI data. Brain Behav 9:e01341
Buxton RB (2013) The physics of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Rep Prog Phys 76:096601
Park B-Y, Park H, Morys F et al (2021) Inter-individual body mass variations relate to fractionated functional brain hierarchies. Commun Biol 4:735
Wilmet G, Verlinde R, Vandevoorde J et al (2017) Correlation between Body Mass Index and abdominal circumference in Belgian adults: a cross-sectional study. Rom J Intern Med 55:28–35
Ward PGD, Orchard ER, Oldham S et al (2020) Individual differences in haemoglobin concentration influence bold fMRI functional connectivity and its correlation with cognition. NeuroImage 221:117196
Murphy K, Birn RM, Bandettini PA (2013) Resting-state fMRI confounds and cleanup. NeuroImage 80:349–359
Tsvetanov KA, Henson RNA, Rowe JB (2021) Separating vascular and neuronal effects of age on fMRI BOLD signals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 376:20190631
Acknowledgments
The study was financed by the Research Council of Norway (Project no. 276044: When Default is not Default: Solutions to the replication crisis and beyond). The data were provided by the Betula prospective cohort study, Umeå University, Sweden. The Betula Project is supported by Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW) and the Swedish Research Council (K2010-61X-21446-01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Vaisvilaite, L., Wang, MY., Andersson, M., Specht, K. (2023). The Effect of Exogenous and Endogenous Parameters on Group Resting-State Effective Connectivity and BOLD Signal. In: Stoyanov, D., Draganski, B., Brambilla, P., Lamm, C. (eds) Computational Neuroscience. Neuromethods, vol 199. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3230-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3230-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3229-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3230-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols