Skip to main content

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Disease Using a Composite Rapid 3-Test Chemiluminescence-Based von Willebrand Factor Assay Panel

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Hemostasis and Thrombosis

Abstract

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most commonly reported inherited bleeding disorder and may alternatively occur as an acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS). VWD/AVWS develops from defects and/or deficiency in the adhesive plasma protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD/AVWS diagnosis/exclusion remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of VWF defects and the technical limitations of many VWF tests, as well as the VWF test panels (number and type of tests) chosen by many laboratories. Laboratory testing for these disorders utilizes evaluation of VWF level and activity, with activity assessment needing several tests due to the many functions performed by VWF in order to help counteract bleeding. This report explains procedures for evaluating VWF level (antigen; VWF:Ag) and activity by means of a chemiluminescence-based panel. Activity assays comprise collagen binding (VWF:CB) and a ristocetin-based recombinant glycoprotein Ib-binding (VWF:GPIbR) assay that reflects a contemporary alternative to classical ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo). This 3-test VWF panel (Ag, CB, GPIbR [RCo]) reflects the only such composite panel available on a single platform and is performed on an AcuStar instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory). Certain regional approvals may also allow this 3-test VWF panel to be performed on the BioFlash instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AVWS:

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome

CLIA:

Chemiluminescent assay

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(s)

EQA:

External quality assessment

FVIII:

Factor VIII

GP:

Glycoprotein

HMWM:

High-molecular-weight multimers

RLUs:

Relative light units

VWD:

von Willebrand disease

VWF:

von Willebrand factor

VWF:Ag:

von Willebrand factor antigen

VWF:CB:

VWF collagen-binding assay

VWF:GPIbB:

VWF GPIb binding

VWF:GPIbR:

VWF glycoprotein I-binding assay using recombinant GPIb

VWF:RCo:

VWF ristocetin cofactor assay

References

  1. Favaloro EJ (2011) Von Willebrand disease: local diagnosis and management of a globally distributed bleeding disorder. Semin Thromb Hemost 37:425–426. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1281028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Federici AB, Budde U, Castaman G, Rand JH, Tiede A (2013) Current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to patients with acquired von Willebrand syndrome: a 2013 update. Semin Thromb Hemost 39:191–201. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1334867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yee A, Kretz CA (2014) von Willebrand factor: form for function. Semin Thromb Hemost 40:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1363155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Colonne CK, Reardon B, Curnow J, Favaloro EJ (2021) Why is misdiagnosis of von Willebrand disease still prevalent and how can we overcome it? A focus on clinical considerations and recommendations. J Blood Med 12:755–768. https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S266791

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Favaloro EJ (2020) Navigating the myriad of von Willebrand factor assays. Hamostaseologie 40:431–442. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1713735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salazar E, Long TA, Smock KJ et al (2022) Analysis of college of American pathologists von Willebrand factor proficiency testing program. Semin Thromb Hemost 48(6):690–699. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758161

  7. Sadler JE, Budde U, Eikenboom JC et al (2006) Update on the pathophysiology and classification of von Willebrand disease: a report of the subcommittee on von Willebrand factor. J Thromb Haemost 4:2103–2114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.02146.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nichols WL, Hultin MB, James AH et al (2008) von Willebrand disease (VWD): evidence-based diagnosis and management guidelines, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) expert panel report (USA). Haemophilia 14:171–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2516.2007.01643.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Laffan MA, Lester W, O’Donnell JS et al (2014) The diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease: a United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors Organization guideline approved by the British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Br J Haematol 167:453–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.13064

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. James PD, Connell NT, Ameer B et al (2021) ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease. Blood Adv 12(5):280–300. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Favaloro EJ, Dean E, Arunachalam S et al (2022) Evaluating errors in the laboratory identification of von Willebrand disease using contemporary von Willebrand factor assays. Pathology 54:308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2021.07.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Favaloro EJ, Elyse Dean E, Arunachalam S (2022) Evaluating performance of contemporary and historical von Willebrand factor (VWF) assays in the laboratory identification of von Willebrand disease (VWD): the experience of the RCPAQAP. Semin Thromb Hemost 48(6):711–731. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1753528

  13. Brown JE, Bosak JO (1986) An ELISA test for the binding of von Willebrand antigen to collagen. Thromb Res 43:303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-3848(86)90150-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Favaloro EJ, Grispo L, Exner T, Koutts J (1991) Development of a simple collagen binding assay aids in the diagnosis of, and permits sensitive discrimination between, Type I and Type II von Willebrand’s disease. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2:285–291. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001721-199104000-00011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Favaloro EJ, Pasalic L, Curnow J (2016) Laboratory tests used to help diagnose von Willebrand disease: an update. Pathology 48:303–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2016.03.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Favaloro EJ (2014) Diagnosing von Willebrand disease: a short history of laboratory milestones and innovations, plus current status, challenges, and solutions. Semin Thromb Hemost 40:551–570. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1383546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ni Y, Nesrallah J, Agnew M et al (2013) Establishment and characterization of a new and stable collagen-binding assay for the assessment of von Willebrand factor activity. Int J Lab Hematol 35:170–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mina A, Favaloro EJ, Koutts J (2012) A novel flow cytometry single tube bead assay for quantitation of von Willebrand factor antigen and collagen binding. Thromb Haemost 108:999–1005. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH12-05-0294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Favaloro EJ, Mohammed S (2016) Evaluation of a von Willebrand factor three test panel and chemiluminescent-based assay system for identification of, and therapy monitoring in, von Willebrand disease. Thromb Res 141:202–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2015.12.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Favaloro EJ, Mohammed S (2017) Laboratory testing for von Willebrand factor collagen binding (VWF:CB). Methods Mol Biol 1646:417–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7196-1_31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lisman T, Raynal N, Groeneveld D et al (2006) A single high-affinity binding site for von Willebrand factor in collagen III, identified using synthetic triple-helical peptides. Blood 108:3753–3756. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-03-011965

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M et al (2012) Quality standards for sample collection in coagulation testing. Semin Thromb Hemost 38:565–575. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1315961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Adcock Funk DM, Lippi G, Favaloro EJ (2012) Quality standards for sample processing, transportation, and storage in hemostasis testing. Semin Thromb Hemost 38:576–585. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1319768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2008) Collection, transport, and processing of blood specimens for testing plasma-based coagulation assays and molecular hemostasis assays; approved guideline. 5th ed. CLSI Document H21–A5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne

    Google Scholar 

  25. Favaloro EJ, Soltani S, McDonald J (2004) Potential laboratory misdiagnosis of haemophilia and von Willebrand disorder due to cold activation of blood samples for testing. Am J Clin Pathol 122:686–692. https://doi.org/10.1309/E494-7DG4-8TVY-19C2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Böhm M, Täschner S, Kretzschmar E et al (2006) Cold storage of citrated whole blood induces drastic time- dependent losses in factor VIII and von Willebrand factor: potential for misdiagnosis of haemophilia and von Willebrand’s disease. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 17:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mbc.0000198990.16598.85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Woodhams B, Girardot O, Blanco MJ et al (2001) Stability of coagulation proteins in frozen plasma. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 12:229–236. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001721-200106000-00002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Favaloro EJ, Oliver S, Mohammed S et al (2017) Potential misdiagnosis of von Willebrand disease and haemophilia caused by ineffective mixing of thawed plasma. Haemophilia 23:e436–e443. https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.13305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Favaloro EJ, Lippi G (2018) Pre-analytical issues that may cause misdiagnosis in haemophilia and von Willebrand disease. Haemophilia 24:198–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.13396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gosselin RC, Honeychurch K, Kang HJ, Dwyre DM (2020) Effect of multiple freeze-thaw cycles on coagulation testing. Semin Thromb Hemost 46:515–520. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2008) Defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; approved guideline—Third Edition. CLSI document C28-A3c. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne

    Google Scholar 

  32. Favaloro EJ, Soltani S, McDonald J et al (2005) Reassessment of ABO-blood group, gender and age on laboratory parameters used to diagnose von Willebrand disorder (VWD): potential influence on the diagnosis versus the potential association with risk of thrombosis. Am J Clin Pathol 124:910–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Favaloro EJ, Franchini M, Lippi G (2014) Aging hemostasis: changes to laboratory markers of hemostasis as we age. A narrative review. Semin Thromb Hemost 40:621–633. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1384631

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bodó I, Eikenboom J, Montgomery R et al (2015) Platelet-dependent von Willebrand factor activity. Nomenclature and methodology: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 13:1345–1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.12964

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Duncan E, Rodgers S (2017) One-stage factor VIII assays. Methods Mol Biol 1646:247–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7196-1_20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rodgers S, Duncan E (2017) Chromogenic factor VIII assays for improved diagnosis of hemophilia A. Methods Mol Biol 1646:265–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7196-1_21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Favaloro EJ (2022) Commentary on “ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the diagnosis of VWD”: reflections based on recent contemporary test data. Blood Adv 6:416–419. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005946

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Mohammed S, Favaloro EJ (2017) Laboratory testing for von Willebrand factor: factor VIII binding (for 2N VWD). Methods Mol Biol 1646:461–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7196-1_34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Frontroth JP, Favaloro EJ (2017) Ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) and RIPA mixing studies. Methods Mol Biol 1646:473–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7196-1_35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Othman M, Favaloro EJ (2021) 2B von Willebrand disease diagnosis: considerations reflecting on 2021 multi-society guidelines. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 5:e12635. https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12635

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Oliver S, Lau KKE, Chapman K, Favaloro EJ (2017) Laboratory testing for Von Willebrand factor multimers. Methods Mol Biol 1646:495–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7196-1_36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Favaloro EJ, Oliver S, Mohammed S, Vong R (2020) Comparative assessment of von Willebrand factor multimers vs activity for von Willebrand disease using modern contemporary methodologies. Haemophilia 26:503–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.13957

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Favaloro EJ, Mohammed S, Vong R et al (2021) How we diagnose 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD): use of a strategic algorithmic approach to distinguish 2M VWD from other VWD types. Haemophilia 27:137–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.14204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the current laboratory and past staff for regular performance of these VWF assays in the ICPMR laboratory. We also thank Werfen/IL for past assistance with CLIA-based assay evaluations performed in our laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel J. Favaloro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Favaloro, E.J., Mohammed, S., Vong, R., Pasalic, L. (2023). Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Disease Using a Composite Rapid 3-Test Chemiluminescence-Based von Willebrand Factor Assay Panel. In: Favaloro, E.J., Gosselin, R.C. (eds) Hemostasis and Thrombosis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2663. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3175-1_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3175-1_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3174-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3175-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics