Skip to main content

Detection and Identification of the Causal Agents of Dothistroma Needle Blight

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Plant Pathology

Abstract

Dothistroma needle blight (DNB) is one of the most damaging foliage diseases of pine in plantations and natural forests worldwide and is caused by two closely related fungi: Dothistroma septosporum and D. pini, which are virtually impossible to differentiate from each other based on morphology. Although diagnosis of DNB based on symptoms is relatively reliable in the later stages of the disease when fruit bodies (conidiomata) are formed, for diagnosis in the early stages, as well as identification of the causal agent at species level, molecular methods are required. In addition, reliable and sensitive diagnostics before sporulation is a prerequisite for early detection to minimize accidental introductions of disease through movement of infected plant materials, especially seedlings. While amplification and sequencing of the ITS region of the rDNA alone is not reliable to differentiate the two species, conventional PCR (cPCR) using species-specific primers or mating type-specific primers and quantitative PCR (qPCR) are widely used and accepted molecular methods to identify and differentiate the DNB pathogens, either from cultures or directly from needles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drenkhan R, Tomešová-Haataja V, Fraser S et al (2016) Global geographic distribution and host range of Dothistroma species: a comprehensive review. For Pathol 46:408¬442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes I, Crous PW, Wingfield BD et al (2004) Multigene phylogenies reveal that red band needle blight of Pinus is caused by two distinct species of Dothistroma, D. septosporum and D. pini. Stud Mycol 50:551–565

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnes I, Kirisits T, Wingfield MJ et al (2011) Needle blight of pine caused by two species of Dothistroma in Hungary. For Pathol 41(5):361–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Groenewald M, Barnes I, Bradshaw RE et al (2007) Characterization and distribution of mating type genes in the Dothistroma needle blight pathogens. Phytopathology 97(7):825–834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ioos R, Fabre B, Saurat C et al (2010) Development, comparison, and validation of real-time and conventional PCR tools for the detection of the fungal pathogens causing brown spot and red band needle blights of pine. Phytopathology 100(1):105–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schneider S, Jung E, Queloz V et al (2019) Detection of pine needle diseases caused by Dothistroma septosporum, Dothistroma pini and Lecanosticta acicola using different methodologies. For Pathol 49(2):e12495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Watt MS, Kriticos DJ, Alcaraz S et al (2009) The hosts and potential geographic range of Dothistroma needle blight. Forest Ecol Manag 257(6):1505–1519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Janosikova-Heckova Z, Ondruskova E, Barta M et al (2018) The hosts and geographic range of Dothistroma needle blight in Slovakia. For Pathol 48(3):e12421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsiakh I, Dogmus-Lehtijarvi HT, Kramarets V et al (2018) Dothistroma spp. in Western Ukraine and Georgia. For Pathol 48(2):e12409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mullett MS, Adamson K, Bragança H et al (2018) New country and regional records of the pine needle blight pathogens Lecanosticta acicola, Dothistroma septosporum and Dothistroma pini. For Pathol 48(5):e12440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S et al (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky J, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes‐application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2(2):113–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Korhonen K, Hintikka V (1980) Simple isolation and inoculation methods for fungal cultures. Karstenia 20(1):19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fraser S, Weitz HJ, Brown AV et al (2016) Storage of Dothistroma septosporum cultures. For Pathol 46(5):547–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Funda Oskay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Oskay, F., Lehtijärvi, A., Lehtijärvi, H.T.D. (2022). Detection and Identification of the Causal Agents of Dothistroma Needle Blight. In: Luchi, N. (eds) Plant Pathology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2536. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2517-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2517-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2516-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2517-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics