Abstract
In the last two decades, it has been shown that bacterial chromosomes have remarkable spatial organization at various scales, and they display well-defined movements during the cell cycle, for example to reliably segregate daughter chromosomes. More recently, various labs have begun investigating also the short time dynamics (displacements during time intervals of 0.1 s–100 s), which should be related to the molecular structure. Probing these dynamics is analogous to “microrheology” approaches that have been applied successfully to study mechanical response of complex fluids. These studies of chromosome fluctuation dynamics have revealed differences of fluctuation amplitude across the chromosome, and different characters of motion depending on the time window of interest. Different fluctuation amplitudes have also been observed for the same chromosomal loci under antibiotic treatments, with magnitudes that are correlated to changes in intracellular density and thus crowding. We describe how to carry out tracking experiments of single loci and how to analyze locus motility. We point out the importance of considering in the analysis the number of GFP molecules per fluorescent locus, as well as the nature of the protein they are fused to, and also how to measure intracellular density.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Javer A, Long Z, Nugent E et al (2013) Short-time movement of E. coli chromosomal loci depends on coordinate and subcellular localization. Nat Commun 4:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3003
Javer A, Kuwada NJ, Long Z et al (2014) Persistent super-diffusive motion of Escherichia coli chromosomal loci. Nat Commun 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4854
Wang X, Llopis PM, Rudner DZ (2013) Organization and segregation of bacterial chromosomes. Nat Rev Genet 14:191–203
Valkenburg JAC, Woldringh CL (1984) Phase separation between nucleoid and cytoplasm in Escherichia coli as defined by immersive refractometry. J Bacteriol 160:1151–1157. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.160.3.1151-1157.1984
Mondal J, Bratton BP, Li Y et al (2011) Entropy-based mechanism of ribosome-nucleoid segregation in E. coli Cells. Biophys J 100:2605–2613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2011.04.030
Wiggins PA, Cheveralls KC, Martin JS et al (2010) Strong intranucleoid interactions organize the Escherichia coli chromosome into a nucleoid filament. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:4991–4995. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912062107
Fisher JK, Bourniquel A, Witz G et al (2013) Four-dimensional imaging of E. coli nucleoid organization and dynamics in living cells. Cell 153:882–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.006
Hadizadeh Yazdi N, Guet CC, Johnson RC, Marko JF (2012) Variation of the folding and dynamics of the Escherichia coli chromosome with growth conditions. Mol Microbiol 86:1318–1333. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12071
Youngren B, Nielsen HJ, Jun S, Austin S (2014) The multifork Escherichia coli chromosome is a self-duplicating and self-segregating thermodynamic ring polymer. Genes Dev 28:71–84. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.231050.113
Jun S, Wright A (2010) Entropy as the driver of chromosome segregation. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:600–607
Jun S, Mulder B (2006) Entropy-driven spatial organization of highly confined polymers: Lessons for the bacterial chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:12388–12393. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605305103
Lim HC, Surovtsev IV, Beltran BG et al (2014) Evidence for a DNA-relay mechanism in ParABS-mediated chromosome segregation. elife 2014. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02758
Jung Y, Jeon C, Kim J et al (2012) Ring polymers as model bacterial chromosomes: confinement, chain topology, single chain statistics, and how they interact. Soft Matter 8:2095–2102. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1sm05706e
Bryant JA, Sellars LE, Busby SJW, Lee DJ (2014) Chromosome position effects on gene expression in Escherichia coli K-12. Nucleic Acids Res 42:11383–11392. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku828
Cagliero C, Grand RS, Jones MB et al (2013) Genome conformation capture reveals that the Escherichia coli chromosome is organized by replication and transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 41:6058–6071. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt325
Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J et al (2002) Molecular biology of the cell, 4th edn. Garland Science, New York
Reyes-Lamothe R, Wang X, Sherratt D (2008) Escherichia coli and its chromosome. Trends Microbiol 16:238–245
Wang X, Liu X, Possoz C, Sherratt DJ (2006) The two Escherichia coli chromosome arms locate to separate cell halves. Genes Dev 20:1727–1731. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.388406
Joshi MC, Bourniquel A, Fisher J et al (2011) Escherichia coli sister chromosome separation includes an abrupt global transition with concomitant release of late-splitting intersister snaps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:2765–2770. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019593108
Espeli O, Mercier R, Boccard F (2008) DNA dynamics vary according to macrodomain topography in the E. coli chromosome. Mol Microbiol 68:1418–1427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06239.x
Nielsen HJ, Li Y, Youngren B et al (2006) Progressive segregation of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Mol Microbiol 61:383–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05245.x
Kuwada NJ, Cheveralls KC, Traxler B, Wiggins PA (2013) Mapping the driving forces of chromosome structure and segregation in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 41:7370–7377. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt468
Pelletier J, Halvorsen K, Ha B-Y et al (2012) Physical manipulation of the Escherichia coli chromosome reveals its soft nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(40):E2649–E2656. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208689109/-/DCSupplemental
Hong SH, Toro E, Mortensen KI et al (2013) Caulobacter chromosome in vivo configuration matches model predictions for a supercoiled polymer in a cell-like confinement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:1674–1679. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220824110
Weber SC, Theriot JA, Spakowitz AJ (2010) Subdiffusive motion of a polymer composed of subdiffusive monomers. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 82:011913. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.011913
Weber SC, Spakowitz AJ, Theriot JA (2012) Nonthermal ATP-dependent fluctuations contribute to the in vivo motion of chromosomal loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:7338–7343. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119505109
Weber SC, Thompson MA, Moerner WE et al (2012) Analytical tools to distinguish the effects of localization error, confinement, and medium elasticity on the velocity autocorrelation function. Biophys J 102:2443–2450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.062
Cicuta P, Donald AM (2007) Microrheology: a review of the method and applications. Soft Matter 3:1449–1455. https://doi.org/10.1039/b706004c
Levi V, Gratton E (2007) Exploring dynamics in living cells by tracking single particles. Cell Biochem Biophys 48:1–15
Saxton MJ (1997) Single-particle tracking: the distribution of diffusion coefficients. Biophys J 72:1744–1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78820-9
Meijering E, Dzyubachyk O, Smal I (2012) Methods for cell and particle tracking. In: Methods in enzymology. Academic Press Inc., pp 183–200
Crocker JC, Grier DG (1996) Methods of digital video microscopy for colloidal studies. J Colloid Interface Sci 179:298–310. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1996.0217
Weber SC, Spakowitz AJ, Theriot JA (2010) Bacterial chromosomal loci move subdiffusively through a viscoelastic cytoplasm. Phys Rev Lett 104:238102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.238102
Wlodarski M, Raciti B, Kotar J et al (2017) Both genome and cytosol dynamics change in E. coli challenged with sublethal rifampicin. Phys Biol 14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/aa5b71
Wlodarski M, Mancini L, Raciti B et al (2020) Cytosolic crowding drives the dynamics of both genome and cytosol in Escherichia coli challenged with sub-lethal antibiotic treatments. iScience 23(10):101560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101560
Crozat E, Tardin C, Salhi M et al (2020) Post-replicative pairing of sister ter regions in Escherichia coli involves multiple activities of MatP. Nat Commun 11:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17606-6
Cheezum MK, Walker WF, Guilford WH (2001) Quantitative comparison of algorithms for tracking single fluorescent particles. Biophys J 81:2378–2388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75884-5
Jaqaman K, Loerke D, Mettlen M et al (2008) Robust single-particle tracking in live-cell time-lapse sequences. Nat Methods 5:695–702. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1237
Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Prentice Hall P Digital Image Processing Third Edition Pearson International Edition prepared by Pearson Education
Thompson RE, Larson DR, Webb WW (2002) Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes. Biophys J 82:2775–2783. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75618-X
Stouf M, Meile JC, Cornet F (2013) FtsK actively segregates sister chromosomes in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:11157–11162. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304080110
Nielsen HJ, Ottesen JR, Youngren B et al (2006) The Escherichia coli chromosome is organized with the left and right chromosome arms in separate cell halves. Mol Microbiol 62:331–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05346.x
Stevenson K, McVey AF, Clark IBN et al (2016) General calibration of microbial growth in microplate readers. Sci Rep 6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38828
Basan M, Zhu M, Dai X et al (2015) Inflating bacterial cells by increased protein synthesis. Mol Syst Biol 11:836. https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20156178
Tomasek K, Bergmiller T, Guet CC (2018) Lack of cations in flow cytometry buffers affect fluorescence signals by reducing membrane stability and viability of Escherichia coli strains. J Biotechnol 268:40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.01.008
Crespi A, Lobino M, Matthews JCF et al (2012) Measuring protein concentration with entangled photons. Appl Phys Lett 100:233704. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4724105
Savin T, Doyle PS (2005) Static and dynamic errors in particle tracking microrheology. Biophys J 88:623–638. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.042457
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to K. Dorfman, V.G. Benza, B. Sclavi, A. Spakowitz, O. Espeli, P.A. Wiggins, N. Kleckner, L. Mirny, and G. Fraser for helpful discussions; Z. Long, E. Nugent, M. Grisi, K. Siriwatwetchakul, J. Kotar, and C. Saggioro for their help with the experimental setups and bacterial strains; and O. Espeli and F. Boccard for the gift of bacterial strains developed in their laboratory. This work was supported by the International Human Frontier Science Program Organization, grant RGY0070/2014, and Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT) and UKRI grant EP/T002778/1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Mancini, L., Crozat, E., Javer, A., Lagomarsino, M.C., Cicuta, P. (2022). Dynamics of Bacterial Chromosomes by Locus Tracking in Fluorescence Microscopy. In: Leake, M.C. (eds) Chromosome Architecture. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2476. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2221-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2221-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2220-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2221-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols