Abstract
The Nuclear Materials Technology Division at the Los Alamos National Laboratory performs consequence analysis on postulated accident scenarios identified during facility hazard analyses. While a comprehensive set of qualitative criteria was established for consequence analysis, quantitative criteria have historically been exiguous. The sparsity of established quantitative criteria coupled with ambiguities in the existing qualitative criteria has contributed to inconsistencies in these analyses. This paper will detail recent changes the NMT Division has made in its consequence analysis methodology designed to increase its objectivity and to facilitate consistency. These changes include the establishment of a complete set of quantitative consequence-severity criteria for accident phenomenon common to the NMT Division facilities as applied to receptors of interest.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Robinson, Mark A. and Gordon, D. J., Los Alamos Controlled Publication, LA-UR-02-6229, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA, October, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag London
About this paper
Cite this paper
Robinson, M.A., Lynch, C.M., Gordon, D.J. (2004). Establishment of Quantitative Consequence Analyses Criteria for the Los Alamos National Laboratory Nuclear Materials Technology Division. In: Spitzer, C., Schmocker, U., Dang, V.N. (eds) Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_268
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_268
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1057-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-410-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive