Abstract
Speakers or writers who have to describe a spatial configuration to other people are faced with the following problem: The object they have to describe is two- or three-dimensional, but their verbal output is highly constrained by the one-dimensional, linear structure of language. Translating a multidimensional entity into a linear output thus requires the construction of a linear structure, which itself requires a series of cognitive decisions. Some important questions are: Which planning procedures do describers use to produce a description ? Can descriptive strategies be identified in speakers’ or writers’ productions ? The study reported in this chapt deals with unconstrained descriptions of a spatial configuration. Subjects were presented with the map of a fictitious island bearing nine landmarks and were asked to produce a written description of the map. The descriptions were analyzed using an ATN-based system designed to construct a representation of descriptions and to classify them according to a typology. The texts contained a variety of descriptive sequences, most of which reflected highly systematic structures. The great majority of subjects produced descriptions from a survey perspective. Introductory statements providing addressees with a spatial framework were produced more frequently by subjects who adopted highly systematic descriptive strategies. These subjects also tended to use absolute modes of landmark location, as well as canonical spatial terms referring to cardinal points. Descriptive sequences were considered to reflect the structural organization of the subjects’ mental representations of the spatial configurations they had to describe.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aurnague, M. and Vieu, L. (1993). A three-level approach to the semantics of space, In The semantics of prepositions: From mental processing to natural language processing (C. Zelinsky-Wibbelt, ed.), pp. 393–439. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bisseret, A. and Montarnal, C. (1993). Stratégies de linéarisation lors de descriptions textuelles de configurations spatiales, Rapport de recherche No. 1927, INRIA, Grenoble
Brambring, M. (1982). Language and geographic orientation for the blind, In Speech, place, and action (R.J. Jarvella and W. Klein, eds.), pp. 203–218. Chichester: Wiley.
Conklin, E.J. and McDonald, D.D. (1982). Salience: The key to the selection problem in natural language generation, In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 129–135, Toronto, 16–18 June 1982.
Denis, M. (1994). La description d’itinéraires: Des repères pour des actions. Notes et Documents du LIMSI, No. 94-14, Juillet 1994.
Denis, M. and Denhière, G. (1990). Comprehension and recall of spatial descriptions. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology 10, 115–143.
Denis, M., Robin, F., Zock, M. and Laroui, A. (1994). Identifying and simulating cognitive strategies for the description of spatial networks, In Comprehension of graphics (W. Schnotz and R.W. Kulhavy, eds.), pp. 77–94. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Ehrich, V. and Koster, C. (1983). Discourse organization and sentence form: The structure of room descriptions in Dutch. Discourse Processes 6, 169–195.
Ehrlich, K. and Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1982). Spatial descriptions and referential continuity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21, 296–306.
Foos, P.W. (1980). Constructing cognitive maps from sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6, 25–38.
Garrod, S. and Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition 27, 181–218.
Klein, W. (1983). Deixis and spatial orientation in route directions, In Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application (H. L. Pick Jr. and L.P. Acredolo, eds.), pp. 283–311. New York: Plenum.
Levelt, W.J.M. (1982). Linearization in describing spatial networks, In Processes, beliefs, and questions (S. Peters and E. Saarinen, eds.), pp. 199–220. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Linde, C. and Labov, W. (1975). Spatial networks as a site for the study of language and thought. Language 51, 924–939.
Maass, W. (1993). A cognitive model for the process of multimodal, incremental route descriptions, In Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (A.U. Frank and I. Campari, eds.), pp. 1–13. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Mani, K. and Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1982). The mental representation of spatial descriptions. Memory and Cognition 10, 181–187.
Shanon, B. (1984). Room descriptions. Discourse Processes 7, 225–255.
Taylor, H.A. and Tversky, B. (1992). Descriptions and depictions of environments. Memory and Cognition 20, 483–496.
Tversky, B. (1991). Spatial mental models, In The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (G.H. Bower, ed.), Vol. 27, pp. 109–145. New York: Academic Press.
Vandeloise, C. (1986). L’espace en francais: Semantique desprepositions spatiales, Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daniel, MP., Carité, L., Denis, M. (1996). Modes of Linearization in the Description of Spatial Configurations. In: Portugali, J. (eds) The Construction of Cognitive Maps. GeoJournal Library, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-33485-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-33485-1_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3949-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-585-33485-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive