Skip to main content

Abstract

The previous four chapters have discussed the basic principles of drug kinetics and dynamics. These principles will be applied in this chapter to explain the known clinical properties of anesthetic drugs administered as intermittent intravenous doses. A drug administered as a single rapid intravenous dose is called a bolus intravenous dose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fahey MR, et al: Clinical pharmacology of ORG NC45 (Norcuron”). A new nondepolarizing muscle relaxant. Anesthesiology, 1981: 55: 6–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker KE: Plasma levels of thiopental necessary for anesthesia. Anesthesiology, 1978: 49: 192–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kissin I, et al: Inotropic and anesthetic potencies of etomidate and thiopental in dogs. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 1983: 62: 961–965.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lauven PM, et al: Venous threshold concentrations of methohexitone. Anesthesiology, 1985: 63: A368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Todd MM, et al: The hemodynamic consequences of high-dose methohexital anesthesia in humans. Anesthesiology, 1984: 61: 495–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaukinen S: The combined effects of antihypertensive drugs and anesthetics (Halothane and Ketamine) on the isolated heart. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1978: 22: 649–657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schuttler J, et al: Infusion strategies to investigate the pharmacokineytics and pharmacodynamics of hypnotic drugs: etomidate as an example. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 1985: 2: 133–142.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodchild CS, Serrao JM: Cardiovascular effects of propofol in the anaesthetized dog. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1989: 63: 87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Major E, et al: Influence of sample site on blood concentrations of ICI 35868. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1983: 55: 371–375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barratt RL, et al: Kinetics of thiopentone in relation to the site of sampling. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1984: 56: 1385–1391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reves JG, et al: Negative inotropic effects of midazolam. Anesthesiology, 1984: 60: 517.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Taeger K, et al: Pulmonary kinetics of fentanyl and alfentanil in surgical patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1988: 61: 425–434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dundee JW, et al: Some factors influencing plasma thiopentone concentrations at awakening. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1980:52: 101P.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Christensen JH, et al: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of thiopentone. A comparison between young and elderly patients. Anaesthesia, 1982: 37: 398–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Price HL, et al: Rates of uptake and release of thiopental by human brain; relation to kinetics of thiopental anesthesia. Anesthesiology, 1957: 18: 171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Price HL, et al: The uptake of thiopental by body tissues and its relation to the duration of narcosis. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1960: 1: 16–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kay B: A dose-response relationship for etomidate with some observations on cumulation. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1976: 48: 213–215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gourlay GK, et al: A double-blind comparison of the efficacy of methadone and morphine in postoperative pain control. Anesthesiology, 1986: 64: 322–327.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gourlay GK, et al: Postoperative pain control with methadone: Influence of supplementary methadone doses and blood concentration-response relationships. Anesthesiology, 1984: 61: 19–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lemmens HJM, et al: Age has no effect on the pharmacodynamics of alfentanil. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 1988: 67: 956–960.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aussems ME, Hug CC: Plasma concentrations of alfentanil required to supplement nitrous oxide analgesia for lower abdominal surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1983: 55:supplement 2: 191s–197s.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woerlee, G.M. (1992). Practical I.V. Bolus Kinetics & Dynamics. In: Kinetics and Dynamics of Intravenous Anesthetics. Developments in Critical Care Medicine and Anesthesiolgy, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-28009-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-28009-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-1506-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-28009-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics