Skip to main content

Umbrella Organizations

  • Reference work entry
International Encyclopedia of Civil Society

Introduction

In contrast to other forms of civil society organizations umbrella organizations have not received adequate research attention from third sector scholars. Umbrella organizations are predominantly “member-benefit or member-serving organizations,” which sets them apart from other civil society organizations. Umbrella organizations exist in business, industry, commerce, politics, and the professions, as well as many areas of civil society. But the ones that are examined here are those found in the social and welfare fields of civil society. There is no accurate estimate of the number of umbrella organizations in the world, and very little knowledge about their history. During the 1990s, a renewed interest in literature and research on umbrella organizations has emerged. The main reason for this has been the controversy surrounding their role in the political sphere undertaking cause or advocacy related activities. Many are funded by fees or subscriptions from their own member...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,100.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References/Further Readings

  • Austin, M. (2003). The changing relationship between nonprofit organizations and public social service agencies in the era of welfare reform. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S. (2001). The game of contracted services. In S. J. Ott (Ed.), Understanding nonprofit organizations (pp. 267–275). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black Sea Non-Governmental Organization’s Network (BSNGON). (2005). The challenges faced in emerging democracies in establishing national umbrella organizations. BSDGON, from www.bsngon.com/aboutus/documents/2005/Network%20Strategy%20lobbying%20group%2019.12.05.doc; 08/09/2008

  • Bruszt, L., & Vedres, B. (2008). The politics of civic combinations. Voluntas, 19, 140–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, J., Dalton, B., Onyx, J., & Melville, R. (2008, February). Advocacy in the age of compacts: Regulating government – Community sector relations: International experiences (Working Paper Series No 76). Centre for Australian Community Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, C. (1991). An agency-based approach to analyze collaborative federated interorganizational relationships. Journal of Applied Behavioural Sciences, 27(1), 116–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gann, N. (2001). Towards a contract culture. In S. J. Ott (Ed.), Understanding nonprofit organizations (pp. 247–255). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grønbjerg, K. (1987). Patterns of institutional relations in the welfare state. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 16(1), 64–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gugerty, M. K. (n.d.). Collection action in nonprofit umbrella associations in Africa, from http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/wgape/papers/6_Gugerty.doc; 6/09/2008.

  • Hamilton, C., & Maddison, S. (2007). Silencing dissent: How the Australian government is controlling public opinion and stifling debate. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkingson, V. A., Weitzman, M. S., Noga, S. M., & Gorski, H. A. (1993). A portrait of the independent sector. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1998). Compact on relations between government and the voluntary and community sector in England, from http://compact.live.poptech.coop/CB2/document_tree/ViewACategory/asp?CategoryID = 49 > 10/04/2007

  • Industry Commission. (1995). Charitable organizations in Australia (Rep. No. 45). Melbourne: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal, M. A. (2006). The ideological divide of the nonprofit sector in Pakistan. Paper presented at the International Society for Third Sector Research, Bangkok, July 9–12, from www.istr.org/conferences/bangkok/WPVolume/Iqbal.MuhammadAsif.pdf; 19/08/2008

  • Kramer, R. M. (1994). Voluntary agencies and the contract culture: Dream or nightmare. Social Service Review, March, 33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liou, Y. T., & Stroh, R. C. (1998). Community development intermediaries systems in the United States: Origins, evolution, and functions. Housing Policy Debate, 9(3), 575–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, M. (2001). The third sector. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, R. (1999). The state and community sector peak bodies: Theoretical and policy challenges. Third Sector Review, 5(2), 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, R. (2008). ‘Token participation to engaged participations’: Lessons learnt and challenges ahead for Australian not-for-profits. In J. Barraket (Ed.), Strategic issues for the not-for-profit sector (pp. 103–124). Sydney: UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, R., & Perkins, R. (2003). Changing roles of community sector peak bodies in a neoliberal policy role in Australia, An ARC funded study (2000–2002), from www.uow.edu.au/arts/archives/iscci/publications/peakstudy.pdf;5/09/2008.

  • Mishra, R. (1999). Globalization and the welfare state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mujawayezu, P. (2008). Presentation by CCOAIB: An umbrella organization for the Rwandan NGOS for development at the grass roots level in Rwanda, from http://209.85.173.104/search?q = cache:j4ivneuKSh4J:www.idasa.org.za/gbOutputFiles.asp%3FWriteContent%3DY%26RID%3D1135 + Presentation + by + CCOAIB&hl = en&ct = clnk&cd = 1&gl = au, 8/09/2008.

  • Pasha, A. G., & Iqbal, M. A. (2002). Nonprofit sector in Pakistan: Government policy and future issues. Pakistan Development Review, 14(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. (1993). The federation as an interorganizational linkage network. Academy of Management Review, 8(1), 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Council of Social Services (QCOSS). (1996). Managing the reform process. Brisbane: Kelvin Grove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1997). Defining the nonprofit sector. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selsky, J. W. (1998). Developmental dynamics in nonprofit – Sector federalism. Voluntas, 9(3), 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, D. (2007). State-third sector partnership frameworks: From administration to participation. In P. Henman & M. Fenger (Eds.), Administering welfare reform (pp. 45–72). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. (2001). Organizational identity and the structure of nonprofit umbrella organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 11(3), 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Melville, R. (2010). Umbrella Organizations. In: Anheier, H.K., Toepler, S. (eds) International Encyclopedia of Civil Society. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_628

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_628

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-93994-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-93996-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics