How should the ‘long’ eighteenth century be defined? January 1, 1700 and December 31, 1799 are quite arbitrary dates. Why should they be chosen to segment our history rather than more significant periods of time, periods which have a coherent content, or are marked, perhaps, by the working out of a theme? Students of English literature sometimes take the long eighteenth century to extend from John Milton (Paradise Lost, 1667) to the passing of the first generation of Romantics (Keats (d. 1821), Shelley (d. 1822), Byron (d. 1824), Coleridge (d. 1834)). Students of British political history often take it to start with the accession of Charles II (the Restoration) in 1660 or, alternatively, the so-called Glorious Revolution of 1688 and to end with the great Reform Act of 1832. Others might choose different book ends. In the history of science and philosophy the terminus a quo is sometimes taken as the publication of Descartes’ scientific philosophy or, in more Anglophone zones, the 1687 publication of Newton’s Principia with its vision of a ‘clockwork universe’. ‘Nature and Nature’s laws’ as Alexander Pope enthused, ‘lay hid in Night: God said, “Let Newton be!” and all was light!’.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Augustine (401). The literal meaning of genesis (J. H. Taylor, Trans.), 1983. Ancient Christian Writers (Vol. 2). Mahway, NJ: Paulist Press (Chapter 18).
Baillarger, J. G. F. (1840). Recherches sur la structure de la couche corticale des circonvolutions du cerveau. Mémoires Académie Royale Médicin 8: 149–183.
Bloch, G. (1980). Mesmerism, a translation of the original scientific and medical writings of F. A. Mesmer. Los Angeles: Kaufmann.
du Bois Reymond, E. (1848/1849). Untersuchungen über theirische Elektricität (2 vols.). Berlin: Reimer.
Borelli, G. (1680/1681). De Motu Animalium (2 vols.). Roma: A. Bernabo.
Burtt, E. A. (1931). The metaphysical foundations of modern physical science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Changeux, P. (1985). Neuronal man: The biology of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cheyne, G. (1733). The English malady. London: G. Strahan.
Cobb, M. (2002). Exorcizing the animal spirit: Jan Swammerdam on nerve function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 395–400.
Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., & Murdoch, D. (1985). The philosophical writings of Descartes (2 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cullen, W. (1827). In J. Thomson (Ed.), The works of William Cullen (Vol. 1). Edinburgh: Blackwood.
Darwin, R. W. (1786). New experiments on the ocular spectra of light. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 76, 313–348.
Darwin, E. (1801). Zoonomia (3rd ed. corrected). London: J. Johnson.
Darwin, E. (1803). Temple of Nature. London: J. Johnson.
Fowler, R. (1793). Experiments and observations relative to the influence lately discovered by M. Galvani and commonly called animal electricity. Edinburgh: Duncan.
French, R. K. (1975). Anatomical education in a Scottish university, 1620: An annotated translation of the lecture notes of John Moir. Aberdeen: Equipress.
Galvani, L. (1791). In A. Forni (Ed.), De Viribus Electricitatis in Motu Musculari (Facsimile ed.). Bologna: Ex typographia Instituti Scientiarum, 1998.
Gardner-Thorpe, C. & Pearn, J. (2006). Erasmus Darwin (1731–1802): Neurologist. Neurology, 66, 1913–1916.
Glynn, I. (1999). Two millennia of Animal Spirit. Nature, 402, 353.
Green, C. D. (2003). Where did the cerebral localisation of the mental faculties come from? Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 39, 131–142.
von Haller, A. (1755). A dissertation on the sensible and irritable parts of animals. London: Nourse.
Hartley, D. (1749). Observations on man, his frame, his duty, and his expectations. London: Thomas Tegg.
Hippocrates. On the sacred disease in works by Hippocrates (Francis Adams, Trans.). Adelaide: e-Books.
Johnson, S. (1739). Life of Dr Herman Boerhaave, late professor of physic in the University of Leyden in Holland. Gentleman’s Magazine, 9, 37–176.
Johnson, S. (1755). A dictionary of the English language. London: Longman, Hitch, Hawes, Millan, R & D Dodsley.
Koyré, A. (1943). Galileo and Plato. Journal of the History of Ideas, 4, 400–428.
de La Mettrie, J. O. (1745). Histoire Naturelle de l’Ame. La Haye: Jean Neaulme.
Loemaker, L. E. (Trans. and Ed.). (1956). Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Philosophical papers and letters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lovejoy, A. O. (1930). The Great Chain of Being. New York: Harper.
MacKinnon, R. (2003). Nobel Prize Lecture at http://www. nobelprize.org/chemistry/laureates/2003/mackinnon- lecture.html.
Malpighi, M. (1666). De cerebri cortice. Bologna.
Monro, A. (1781). In A. Monro (Secundus) (Ed.), The works of Alexander Monro. Edinburgh: Charles Elliot.
Nemesius of Emesa. In W. Telfer (Ed.), (1955). On the nature of man. Cyric of Jerusalem and Nemesius of Emesa. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
Nordstrom, J. (1954). Swammerdamiana: Excerpts from the travel journal of Olaus Borrichius and two letters from Swammerdam to Thevenot. Lynchnos, 16, 21–65.
Pancaldi, G. (1990). Electricity and life: Volta’s path to the battery. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 21, 123–159.
Piccolino, M. (2006). Luigi Galvani’s path to animal electricity. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 329, 303–318.
Porter, R. (2001). Nervousness, eighteenth and nineteenth century style: From luxury to labour. In M. Gijswijt-Hofstra, & R. Porter (Eds.), Cio Medica/The Wellcome series in the history of medicine (Vol. 63). London: Rodopi.
Porter, R. (2003). Flesh in the age of reason. London: Penguin Books.
Priestley, J. (1775). The history and present state of electricity with original experiments (4th ed.). London: Bathurst.
Rieppel, O. (1988). The reception of Leibniz’s philosophy in the writings of Charles Bonnet (1720–1793). Journal of the History of Biology, 21, 119–145.
Smith, C. U. M. (1976). The problem of life: An essay in the origins of biological thought. London: Macmillan.
Smith, C. U. M. (1987). David Hartley’s Newtonian neuropsychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 23, 87–101.
Smith, C. U. M. (1998). Descartes’ pineal neuropsychology. Brain and Cognition, 36, 57–72.
Smith, C. U. M. (1999). Coleridge’s “Theory of Life”. Journal of the History of Biology, 32, 31–50.
Smith, C. U. M. (2002a). Jean Offray de La Mettrie: 1709–1751. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 11, 110–124.
Smith, C. U. M. (2002b). Elements of molecular neurobiology (3rd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
Smith, C. U. M. (2005). All from fibres: Erasmus Darwin’s evolutionary psychobiology. In C. U. M. Smith, & R. Arnott (Eds.), The genius of Erasmus Darwin (pp. 133–143). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Stephanson, R. (1988). Richardson’s “Nerves”: Physiology of sensibility in Clarissa. Journal of the History of Ideas, 49, 267–285.
Sterne, L. (1760). Tristram Shandy. London: R. & J. Dodsley.
Sutton, J. (1998). Philosophy and memory traces: Descartes to connectionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tascioglu, A. O. & Tascioglu, A. B. (2005). Ventricular anatomy: Illustrations and concepts from antiquity to Renaissance. Neuroanatomy, 4, 57–83.
Trembley, A. (1744). Memoires pour servir à l’histoire d’un genre de polypes d’eau douce, a bras en formes de cornes. Leiden: Verbeek.
Trotter, T. (1807). A view of the nervous temperament. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees and Orme.
Vesalius, A. (1543). De Humani corporis Fabrica. Impression Anastatique (1964), Bruxelles: Culture et Civilisation.
Volta, A. (1800). On the electricity excited by mere contact of conducting substances of different kinds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 90, 403–431.
Whytt, R. (1765). Observations on the nature, causes nervous, hypochondriac or hysteric, to which are prefixed some remarks on the sympathy of the nerves. Edinburgh: Balfour.
Willis, T. (1664). Cerebri anatome. London: Martyn and Allestry; (1681). Anatomy of the Brain. London: Classics of Medicine Library
Willis, T. (1672). De Anima Brutorum (S. Pordage, Trans.). London: Thomas Dring; (1684). Dr Willis’ practice of physic. London: Thomas Dring.
Wright, T. (1750). An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe. Reprinted with an introduction by M. A. Hoskin. New York: Elsevier.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, C.U.M. (2007). Brain and Mind in the ‘Long’ Eighteenth Century. In: Whitaker, H., Smith, C.U.M., Finger, S. (eds) Brain, Mind and Medicine: Essays in Eighteenth-Century Neuroscience. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70967-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70967-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-70966-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-70967-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)